CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide
2025/2026 Exam Questions and Correct
Answers | New Update
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999.
Although most of these immigrants were not employed in professional
occupations, many of them were. For instance, many of them were
engineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants
were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in
the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
1
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
,C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - 🧠 ANSWER ✔✔D) Some of
the engineers were immigrants
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is
liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not
negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it
is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking
company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible
for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer,
acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that
damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract
carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in
reference to the accident:
2
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
, A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - 🧠
ANSWER ✔✔C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is
not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-
mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never
be said face-to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
3
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
2025/2026 Exam Questions and Correct
Answers | New Update
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999.
Although most of these immigrants were not employed in professional
occupations, many of them were. For instance, many of them were
engineers and many of them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants
were librarians, another professional occupation.
From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in
the country described above:
A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses
B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants
1
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
,C) None of the engineers were immigrants
D) Some of the engineers were immigrants - 🧠 ANSWER ✔✔D) Some of
the engineers were immigrants
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is
liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not
negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it
is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking
company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible
for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer,
acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that
damaged its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract
carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo was also
damaged.
From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in
reference to the accident:
2
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
, A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent - 🧠
ANSWER ✔✔C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is
not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-
mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never
be said face-to-face or written formally.
From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-
face
3
COPYRIGHT©NINJANERD 2025/2026. YEAR PUBLISHED 2025. COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 619652435. TERMS OF USE. PRIVACY
STATEMENT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
