Advocacy Script
(Replace with your case accordingly
Citadel PLC and Daimon Limited
Introduction
• Good afternoon Master, my name is Mr ____. I appear for the Claimant, ___
• My friend, Mr Evans, appears for the Defendant, ___.
• Master, this is an application for the Claimant for summary judgment. Do you have a copy of the
bundle which has been filed?
Grounds
• Master, this claim relates to an alleged breach of a contract for the supply of elevator components,
sheaves. The alleged breach is of the implied term that sheaves supplied by the Defendant would be of
satisfactory quality. The Defendant defends on the basis that the goods were of satisfactory quality and
that, instead, it was the fault of the Claimant and reasons unconnected that the elevators
malfunctioned. Would you like a summary of the facts?
• Master, the claimant seeks summary judgment on the basis that, under Civil Procedure Rule 24.2, the
Defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling
reason why the case should be disposed of at a trial.
(Replace with your case accordingly
Citadel PLC and Daimon Limited
Introduction
• Good afternoon Master, my name is Mr ____. I appear for the Claimant, ___
• My friend, Mr Evans, appears for the Defendant, ___.
• Master, this is an application for the Claimant for summary judgment. Do you have a copy of the
bundle which has been filed?
Grounds
• Master, this claim relates to an alleged breach of a contract for the supply of elevator components,
sheaves. The alleged breach is of the implied term that sheaves supplied by the Defendant would be of
satisfactory quality. The Defendant defends on the basis that the goods were of satisfactory quality and
that, instead, it was the fault of the Claimant and reasons unconnected that the elevators
malfunctioned. Would you like a summary of the facts?
• Master, the claimant seeks summary judgment on the basis that, under Civil Procedure Rule 24.2, the
Defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and there is no other compelling
reason why the case should be disposed of at a trial.
