100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

FRM Exam 1 Questions and answers 2025.

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
21
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
12-02-2025
Written in
2024/2025

FRM Exam 1 Questions and answers 2025.

Institution
FRM - Financial Risk Manager
Module
FRM - Financial Risk Manager










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
FRM - Financial Risk Manager
Module
FRM - Financial Risk Manager

Document information

Uploaded on
February 12, 2025
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

FRM Exam 1 Questions and answers 2025




Shortcomings .of .risk .metrics .- .ANS✓✓--May .not .scale .over .time
-Historical .data .may .be .meaningless
-Not .designed .to .account .for .catastrophes
-VaR .says .nothing .about .losses .in .excess .of .VaR
-May .not .handle .sudden .illiquidity

Importance .of .communication .for .risk .managers .- .ANS✓✓-Need .to .assess .risk
.and .tell .management .so .they .can .determine .which .risks .to .take .on


Ways .firms .can .fail .to .account .for .risks .- .ANS✓✓--Firm .may .ignore .known .risk
-Somebody .in .firm .may .know .about .risk, .but .it's .not .captured .by .models
-Realization .of .a .truly .unknown .risk

Ways .risk .can .be .mismeasured .- .ANS✓✓--Wrong .distribution
-Historical .sample .may .not .apply

Roles .of .risk .management .- .ANS✓✓--Asses .firm .risks
-Communicate .risks
-Manage .and .monitor .risks

Practical .considerations .related .to .ERM .implementation .- .ANS✓✓--Designate
.ERM .champion .- .usually .CRO
-Make .ERM .part .of .firm .culture
-Determining .all .possible .risks
-Quantifying .operational .and .strategic .risks
-Integrating .risks .(dependencies)
-Lack .of .risk .transfer .mechanisms
-Monitoring

Models .used .in .ERM .framework .- .ANS✓✓-Modeling .approach .is .typically
.between .statistical .analytic .models .and .structural .simulation .models


Risk .types .addressed .by .ERM .- .ANS✓✓--Hazard
-Financial
-Operational
-Strategic

,Traits .of .ERM .- .ANS✓✓--Enterprise .Risk .Management
-ERM .is .a .discipline .- .culture .of .enterprise
-ERM .applies .to .all .industries
-ERM .is .not .just .defensive, .adds .value
-ERM .encompasses .all .risks
-ERM .addresses .all .stakeholders

Risk-adjusted .performance .measure .(RAP) .- .ANS✓✓--Relationship .drawn .from
.CML
-RAP .= .[(market .std .dev)/(portfolio .std .dev)]*(Portfolio .return .- .risk .free .rate) .+
.risk .free .rate
-annualized

VaR-based .analysis .(formula) .- .ANS✓✓--Risk .replaced .with .VaR
(Portfolio .return .- .risk .free .rate)/(portfolio .VaR/initial .value .of .portfolio)

Sortino .ratio .- .ANS✓✓-Sortino .ratio .= .(E(Rp) .-R_min)/sqrt(MSD_min)
MSD_min=summation(R_pt-R_min)^2/N
where .R_pt .is .return .of .the .portfolio .at .time .t
-MAR .- .minimum .acceptable .return .also .denoted .as .R_min .is .the .diff .between
.Sortino .and .Sharpe


Information .ratio .- .ANS✓✓-IR .= .(E(Rp) .- .E(Rb))/(std .dev(Rp-Rb)) .
-Evaluate .manager .of .a .benchmark .fund

Tracking .error .- .ANS✓✓--Std .dev .between .portfolio .return .and .benchmark
.return
TE .= .std .dev .* .(Rp-Rb)
-Benchmark .funds

Treynor .measure .- .ANS✓✓--Excess .return .divided .by .portfolio .beta
Tp .= .(E(Rp) .- .Rf)/portfolio .beta
-Better .for .well .diversified .portfolios

Sharpe .measure .- .ANS✓✓--Excess .return .divided .by .portfolio .volatility .(std
.dev)
Sp .= .(E(Rp) .- .Rf)/(std .dev .of .Rp)
-Better .for .non-diversified .portfolios

Jensen's .alpha .- .ANS✓✓--Excess .return .equated .to .alpha .plus .expected
.systematic .return
alpha_p=
E(Rp) .- .Rf .= .alpha .+ .beta(E(Rm) .- .Rf)

Arbitrage .Pricing .Theory .- .ANS✓✓-a .theory .of .risk-return .relationships .derived
.from .no-arbitrage .considerations .in .large .capital .markets
1. .Create .factor .portfolio .
2.Derive .returns .for .each .factor .portfolio .

, 3. .Calculate .risk .premiums .for .each .factor .portfolio

APT .for .passive .portfolio .management .- .ANS✓✓--Track .an .index .with .a
.portfolio .that .excludes .certain .stocks
-Track .an .index .that .must .include .certain .stocks
-To .closely .track .an .index .while .tailoring .the .risk .exposure

APT .(equation .and .assumptions) .- .ANS✓✓-
E(R_i)=R_f+B_i1RP1+B_i2RP2+...+B_ikRPk
-Returns .on .any .stock .are .linearly .related .to .a .set .of .indexes
-Law .of .one .price
-Returns .follow .k-factor .process
-Well .diversified .portfolios .can .be .formed
-No .arbitrage .opp .exists

Prices .of .risk .vs .sensitivity .- .ANS✓✓--Prices .of .risk .are .common .factors .and
.do .not .change
-Sensitivities .can .change

Multibeta .CAPM .- .ANS✓✓-Ri .- .Rf .= .(market .beta)(Rm .- .Rf) .+ .(sensitivity .to
.inflation .risk)(price .of .inflation .risk)...


Effect .of .non-price-taking .behavior .on .CAPM .- .ANS✓✓-Simple .form .of .CAPM,
.but .market .price .of .risk .is .lower .than .if .all .investors .were .price .takers


Effect .of .heterogeneous .expectations .on .CAPM .- .ANS✓✓-Equilibrium .can .still
.be .expressed .in .returns, .covariance, .and .variance, .but .they .become .complex
.weighted .averages


Nonmarketable .asset .impact .on .CAPM .- .ANS✓✓--ex. .Human .capital
-Equilibrium .return .can .be .higher .or .lower .than .it .is .under .standard .CAPM

Risk .- .ANS✓✓--Volatility .of .expected .outcomes
-Outcomes .are .random .but .distribution .is .known .or .approximated

Derivative .contract .- .ANS✓✓--Derives .value .from .an .underlying .asset, .rate, .or
.index
-Derives .value .from .a .security

Nonparametric .VaR .- .ANS✓✓--Quantile .of .an .empirical .distribution

Parametric .VaR .- .ANS✓✓--Quantile .of .a .statistical .distribution

Four .major .types .of .risk .- .ANS✓✓--Market .risk
-Liquidity .risk
-Credit .risk
-Operational .risk

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
BRAINSCAPE1 Chamberlain College Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
124
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
14
Documents
11141
Last sold
5 days ago
download to pass in your exam

**Profile: Exam and Flashcards Sales**. **Introduction:** Welcome to my profile! I specialize in providing comprehensive exam and flashcard resources tailored to meet your educational needs. With a dedication to quality and effectiveness, I aim to assist students in achieving their academic goals with ease and confide**Services Offered:** 1. **Exam Materials:**- I offer a wide range of exam materials for various subjects and levels, including standardized tests such as SAT, ACT, GRE, GMAT, TOEFL, and more- These materials are meticulously crafted to cover all exam topics comprehensively, ensuring thorough preparation and confidence on test day. 2. **Flashcards:** - My collection of flashcards is designed to facilitate efficient learning and retention of key concepts. - Each set of flashcards is carefully curated to highlight essential information, making studying more manageable and effective. **Why Choose Me:** 1. **Quality Assurance:** - I prioritize quality in all my products, ensuring accuracy, relevance, and reliability. - Every exam material and flashcard set undergoes rigorous review and updating to reflect the latest changes in curriculum and exam formats. 2. **User-Friendly Resources:** - My resources are user-friendly, featuring clear formatting, concise explanations, and intuitive organization to enhance the learning experience. - Whether you're a visual learner or prefer text-based study aids, my materials cater to diverse learning preferences. 3. **Affordability:** - I believe that access to quality educational resources should not be cost-prohibitive. Thus, I offer competitive pricing without compromising on quality.

Read more Read less
4.4

20 reviews

5
12
4
5
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions