100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

Clinical Psychology: Eating Disorders

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
2
Pages
11
Uploaded on
17-12-2013
Written in
2010/2011

Full highlighted lecture notes from two eating disorders lectures in Clinical Psychology module (C83CLI). Includes features, diagnosis, risk factors, models and treatments for Anorexia and Bulimia.










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
December 17, 2013
Number of pages
11
Written in
2010/2011
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
Unknown
Contains
All classes

Content preview

EATING DISORDERS
 Present in 2% of the population, females > males
 Dieting and ED
- Dieting is often the 1st step
- Nevonen & Broberg (2000) - interview study, 70% of anorexics said dieting had been the first step
- Dieting predicts new cases (Patton et al., 1999) and the onset of binging and purging
- But: Stice (2002) : the evidence is equivocal
 Long term issue: 21 years after initial admission, 50% are fully recovered, 21% partially recovered, 10%
still met criteria, 16% dead of causes related to anorexia (Loewe et al., 2001)
 Keel et al. (1999): Bulimia: 222 people followed for 11 years. 11% still met criteria, 70% full or partial
remission
 Difficult to detect in primary care settings
 Bennett: in contrast to many mental health disorders, prevalence of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) highest
among high SES groups and among those with high academic achievement

ANOREXIA: FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT

 Initial diets and weight loss
 Family ‘dysfunction’
 Relationship difficulties
 Low self esteem and confidence
 Emotional suppression (alexthymia)

BULIMIA: FEATURES OF DEVELOPMENT

 Previous diets / AN
 Impulsivity
 Can’t tolerate negative emotions - eating is a coping mechanism for dealing with it
 Attachment issues
 Self-worth - guilt for pursuing own needs

Common to both: abuse, responsibilities of the world /guilt

Stice (2002) evaluates the evidence for risk factors:

 Sexual abuse: no empirical support
 Consistent support for thin-real idealisation = increases in body dissastisfaction, dieting and negative
affect
 Pressure to be thin predicted increases in body dissatisfaction, dieting and negative affect, onset of binge
eating, some null effects
 Modelling (of others) did not predict increases in body dissatisfaction or dieting but did predict onset of
binge eating and bulimic symptoms
 Body dissatisfaction is a risk factor for dieting, negative affect and eating pathology and a maintenance
factor for bulimic symptoms

,  Dieting = increased negative affect, bulimic symptoms and eating pathology, although some mixed
evidence
 Concludes dieting is a risk factor for bulimic pathology but rather attenuates overeating tendencies
 Perfectionism – mixed results, collectively findings support perfectionism as a risk factor for bulimic
pathology and a maintenance factor for eating pathology
 Prevention programmes should focus on reducing malleable risk factors like thin-ideal internalisation,
body dissatisfaction and negative affect and also strive to increase protective factors like self esteem and
social support
 Risk factors can be used to identify high risk groups
 Need better research


Genetics - Strober et al (2000): female relatives with AN were 11x more likely than relatives of controls to get
AN. BN: 3.7 x more likely for relative of those with BN

ANOREXIA NERVOSA (AN)

 “nervous appetite”
 The criteria:
- Refusal to maintain body weight over minimally normal weight (85% generally)
- Intense fear of gaining weight
- Disturbance of body-size evaluations
- Amenorrhoea (if post-pubertal) for at least 3 cycles ( no period)
- Distinguish: a) restricting type (starvation - much more common), b) binge-purging type (less
common, more like bulimia)
 The stats:
- William Gull (1873) first described and named
- Average age of onset 16-18
- As young as 7 reported
- Females > males - for every 10-12 females there is one male (Lucas, 1999)
- Highest mortality rate of any psychiatric disorder - 10% long term (e.g. Battle & Brownwell, 1996)
- Suicide risk x 23 higher than normal (Harris and Barraclough, 1997)
- Comorbidity with depression 63% (Herzog et al., 1992), OCD 35% (Rastam, 1992)
- Reduced brain volume (Swayze et al., 1996)



BULIMIA NERVOSA

 The criteria
- Recurrent binge eating - more than usual plus sense of loss of control - usually on really strict diet
then if have a slip up will think it’s all over and will binge, then have to compensate
- Inappropriate compensatory behaviour - vomiting, laxatives, exercise, fasting
- Both occurring as least twice a week for at least 3 months
- Self esteem influenced by weight
- No evidence of AN
- Purging subtype (vomiting, laxatives)
- Non-purging (fasting , exercise)
 The stats:
- Gerald Russell (1979) first described and named

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
8 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
zoemoon The University of Nottingham
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
148
Member since
12 year
Number of followers
55
Documents
69
Last sold
1 year ago

I have a First Class degree in psychology from the University of Nottingham. I have kept all my handwritten notes and revision cards, as well as the typed revision notes and lecture summaries I made during my course. These notes are clear, concise and informative. Most of the notes also include extra reading which will help you get those extra few marks in an exam or coursework. Please get in contact if there is anything in particular you are after.

Read more Read less
4.0

21 reviews

5
9
4
6
3
4
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions