Case Problem Analysis 06.1: Wrongful Interference Study Guide Exam.

Case Problem Analysis 06.1: Wrongful Interference Study Guide Exam. James Hughes worked for Medtronic, Inc., a medical technology company, as a sales manager. His contract with Medtronic had a non-compete clause that prohibited him from working for a competitor for one year after leaving Medtronic. St. Jude Medical, S.C., Inc., was a competitor of Medtronic. In an effort to expand their business, St. Jude contacted Hughes about joining them. Hughes felt dissatisfied with conditions at Medtronic, and so began negotiations with St. Jude. Hughes shared his current contract with St. Jude's executives, who told him that his contract with Medtronic was unenforceable and offered him a job as a sales director at a significant higher salary. In fact, the contract was enforceable under state law. Hughes accepted the job offer from St. Jude. Medtronic filed a suit against St. Jude, alleging wrongful interference. Did wrongful interference occur and if so, which type of wrongful interference occ - CORRECT ANSWER n/a 1. Hughes worked for ________. - CORRECT ANSWER Medtronic 2. He worked in the position of _________. - CORRECT ANSWER sales manager 3. He________ have a contract with Medtronic. - CORRECT ANSWER did 4. Under the non-compete clause, Hughes was_________ for a competitor for ________ after leaving Medtronic. - CORRECT ANSWER prohibited from working, one year 5. St. Jude______ a competitor with Medtronic. - CORRECT ANSWER was Wrongful interference with a contractual relationship requires_____________ , a third party who__________ , and that same third party who ___________. - CORRECT ANSWER a valid contract between two parties, knows the contract exists, intentionally induces one of the parties to break the contract