100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Case

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
23-05-2024
Written in
2023/2024

Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Case

Institution
Bar
Module
Bar








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
May 23, 2024
Number of pages
4
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Cases
Calderbank - ANS-- without prejudice offers;
- formal offer procedure is UCPR 20.26
- relevant in relation to costs

Small - ANS-UCPR 33.4 setting aside a subpoena
Man fell from train

Consolidated Credit - ANS-UCPR 14.11 late admission of affidavit

Cardile - ANS-Freezing Order against a third party
UCPR 25.14 and Practice Note General 14

Hans Pet Constructions - ANS-Civil Procedure Act Section 57 - objects of case
management.
- magistrate erred in striking out defence as a punishment for late filing of evidence.
- magistrate failed to account for interests of justice after Hans Pet gave evidence so
close to deadline that the other party did not have time to file a defence.
- magistrates decision overruled on lack of evidence that he considered section 57
factors.

Expense Reduction - ANS-UCPR 21.2 Inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents.
- duty to court - overriding purpose of civil proceedings; section 56(3) and 56(4) Civil
Procedure Act.
- duty to client - not to put client in breach of duty to the court section 56(4) civil
procedure act.
- solicitors owe fellow practitioners a duty to return all inadvertently disclosed
documents reasonably suspected to be confidential.

Bi v Mourad - ANS-UCPR 12.7 summary dismissal for want of due despatch.
- 9 years elapsed since events various indugences given to plaintiffs.
- sections 55-60 Civil Procedure Act - dismissal for want of prosecution.
- claim for damages for negligence or nuisance from excavation works of adjoining
property, damages of $257,000 claimed, hearing dates vacated due to amendment to
plaintiffs pleadings.

Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock - ANS-Supreme Court Act section 66 Injunction.
Ex parte injunction = duty of candour.
£7.16
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
AASOCR

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
AASOCR American InterContinental University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
6
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
4823
Last sold
6 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions