100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Criminal Law LL108 - Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Rating
4.0
(1)
Sold
1
Pages
13
Uploaded on
19-06-2017
Written in
2016/2017

These notes are a complete collection of my lecture notes, reading, and extra investigation into the the particular topic. They are fully structured, and have a contents page at the very top, in order to ensure that the ideas and arguments within are easy to navigate. At certain points, I have arranged the notes into an argumentative form. This means that I have taken certain ideas, organised them into arguments, and presented both sides of a contentious proposition. This allows future students to have mini essay plans that they can use to answer parts of an exam question, without having to make major modifications to what they have learnt or, even worse, come up with new arguments on the spot.

Show more Read less








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
June 19, 2017
Number of pages
13
Written in
2016/2017
Type
Summary

Content preview

Criminal Law (LL108) - Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Contents

1. Actus Reus
1.1. Debate: Should causation be independent of legal (and moral) responsibility?
1.2. Yes - Causation should be independent of legal (and moral) responsibility
1.3. No - Causation is and should be linked to morality
2. Drugs cases and causation
2.1. Strand 1 of case law
2.2. Strand 2 of case law
3. Omissions liability
3.1. Definition
3.2. The two types of omission liability in the common law
3.2.1. Relational
3.2.2. Situational

---------------------------------------------------------------

1. Mens Rea
1.1. Intention in Principle
1.1.1. Direct versus Oblique Intention
1.2. Intention in the Courts
2. Recklessness
2.1. Original: Cunningham recklessness
2.2. Change: Caldwell
2.3. Reversion to Original: R v G & R
3. Negligence
3.1. Negligence criteria
3.2. Is negligence an effective deterrent?
4. How should the law deal with cases where D achieved something different to what he intended?
4.1. Unforeseen mode
4.2. Mistaken object
4.3. Transferred fault/malice

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
8 year ago

4.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TGT London School of Economics
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
26
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
19
Documents
41
Last sold
2 year ago

3.8

8 reviews

5
3
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions