Presidetialisation
Why does Dowding argue against the Presidetialisation thesis? Do you agree with him? In
this seminar you will consider how executive power has changed and what the current state
of the executive is.
Overview:
1. Define what the Presidetialisation thesis is
2. Why its relevance and how it was developed.
3. Explain why Dowding disagrees with the thesis and what conclusion he draws.
4. What the current executive state is in and which model fits best in 2022?
5. What model and explanation we think fits the best.
1. What is the Presidetialisation thesis? .
Michael Foley argues that the Prime Minister’s role is at the very central hub of government.
The PM’s power is never simply marginal but always influential and wide ranging and
inevitably dominated by its strong and authoritative chief Executive.
The theory emphases the PM as dominating the executive which contrasts with previous and
historic theories that the PM is first among equals, because this thesis proposes that the PM is
a central power maker.
Foley defines the dominating role of the PM by three characteristics (1) their personal
leadership, (2) their spatial leadership and (3) their ability to reach out to the public.
He titles it the ‘presidentialisation thesis’ because he draws comparisons of the ability to rally
support from the public with the power of the US president in which public support,
structurally is crucial in in order for them to have wide ranging influence.
Why was it relevant, context?
He suggested that there had been a fundamental shift in British politics in which the PM’s
relationship with the public was more important in the running of government through
traditional structures and his fellow colleagues.
He drew on the leadership qualities of both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. His thesis
gained a lot of traction during Blair’s premiership as a result.
Thatcher and Blair personalised and close relationships with the media and the public is
emphasised.
According to Foleys explanation, Blair's rise to office was not because of
the Labour manifesto as a whole, but because of Blair's own personal vision and pledges.
Blair's conduct in office was also based on personal outreach, and his decisions at various
points bypassed the parliament and the cabinet.
According to Foley, this showcases the leader-centered politics of Britain, which as a whole,
has transformed the British Prime Minister into a British president.
2. Why Does Dowding disagree with the thesis and what conclusion he draws?
a. Prime Minister is more powerful to appoint and dismiss with a working majority, President
does not have this power
Bilateral meetings
b. Centralization of Policy making
Treasury’s ‘hollowing-out’ of departments
c. Clique’s influence on the central executive was different from President’s advisor
Why does Dowding argue against the Presidetialisation thesis? Do you agree with him? In
this seminar you will consider how executive power has changed and what the current state
of the executive is.
Overview:
1. Define what the Presidetialisation thesis is
2. Why its relevance and how it was developed.
3. Explain why Dowding disagrees with the thesis and what conclusion he draws.
4. What the current executive state is in and which model fits best in 2022?
5. What model and explanation we think fits the best.
1. What is the Presidetialisation thesis? .
Michael Foley argues that the Prime Minister’s role is at the very central hub of government.
The PM’s power is never simply marginal but always influential and wide ranging and
inevitably dominated by its strong and authoritative chief Executive.
The theory emphases the PM as dominating the executive which contrasts with previous and
historic theories that the PM is first among equals, because this thesis proposes that the PM is
a central power maker.
Foley defines the dominating role of the PM by three characteristics (1) their personal
leadership, (2) their spatial leadership and (3) their ability to reach out to the public.
He titles it the ‘presidentialisation thesis’ because he draws comparisons of the ability to rally
support from the public with the power of the US president in which public support,
structurally is crucial in in order for them to have wide ranging influence.
Why was it relevant, context?
He suggested that there had been a fundamental shift in British politics in which the PM’s
relationship with the public was more important in the running of government through
traditional structures and his fellow colleagues.
He drew on the leadership qualities of both Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. His thesis
gained a lot of traction during Blair’s premiership as a result.
Thatcher and Blair personalised and close relationships with the media and the public is
emphasised.
According to Foleys explanation, Blair's rise to office was not because of
the Labour manifesto as a whole, but because of Blair's own personal vision and pledges.
Blair's conduct in office was also based on personal outreach, and his decisions at various
points bypassed the parliament and the cabinet.
According to Foley, this showcases the leader-centered politics of Britain, which as a whole,
has transformed the British Prime Minister into a British president.
2. Why Does Dowding disagree with the thesis and what conclusion he draws?
a. Prime Minister is more powerful to appoint and dismiss with a working majority, President
does not have this power
Bilateral meetings
b. Centralization of Policy making
Treasury’s ‘hollowing-out’ of departments
c. Clique’s influence on the central executive was different from President’s advisor
