100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Three Certainties Part 2 - Equity and Trusts

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
20-05-2023
Written in
2021/2022

The second part of my notes on the three certainties in the law of equity and trusts - case notes, overview etc









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
May 20, 2023
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Three Certainties 2
Thursday, 24 February 2022 19:57


What is the object of a trust?
- Think about who or what the trust has been created for
- Beneficiary or beneficiaries?
- Charity?
- Ascertainability:
○ OT Computers Ltd v First National Tricity Finance Ltd [2003] EWHC 1010 Ch

Fixed trust - where trustees are given a piece of property or lots of property and are obliged to
distribute it in fixed amounts to each of the beneficiaries

Discretionary trust - trustees have a certain amount of property and have discretion over how much
to give to each of the beneficiaries listed

Fiduciary powers - you don't have to hand it out power, you can just accumulate

Fixed trusts
- Requires a conceptually certain list of beneficiaries
○ IRC v Broadway Cottages Trust [1955] Ch 20
▪ All members of the class could not be listed
▪ Clear who was in and who was not
▪ CoA - void for certainty of object
- Evidentially certain - can we prove who is or isn't part of the category
- Ascertainable - can we find them and actually identify them

Discretionary trusts
- Lindsay v Wood [2006] EWHC 2895 QB
- Individual ascertainability test
○ When is a trust not a trust?
▪ How powers of appointment rescued the discretionary trust
▪ Test of certainty for powers of appointment
□ Re Gestetner's Settlement [1953] Ch 672
□ Re Gulbenkian's Settlement [1970] AC 508

Discretionary trusts - the problem of the duty to exercise power
- Duty to survey the class - IRC v Broadway Cottages [1954]
- Duty to distribute inside the class

Re Baden No 2
- Can it be said with certainty that any given individual that he is or is not a member of the same
class
○ 'relative'
▪ Sachs LJ
□ 'Relative' means: descended from a common ancestor
□ The burden of proof is on postulant - no proof treat as outside
▪ Megaw LJ
□ 'Relative' means: descended from a common ancestor
□ Valid if a substantial number shown to fall inside the class
▪ Stamp LJ
□ 'Relative' means: next of kin
□ Valid if trustees can make an appropriate survey of class

Discretionary trusts McPhail type
- Conceptual uncertainty



Equity and Trusts Page 1
£5.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
charlie01jones

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
Equity and Trusts
-
11 2023
£ 65.89 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
charlie01jones University of Portsmouth
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
33
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions