100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

Implied terms, SoGA and CRA

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
02-04-2023
Written in
2021/2022

implied terms in contracts









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 2, 2023
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
Michaela parkin
Contains
All classes

Content preview

MN10442 – topic 4 -implied terms, SoGA and CRA

Contract terms
- Express – contained In the contract – written/ oral
- Implied – by (law) statute e.g. sale of goods act 1979
 By (fact) through the courts. To give business efficacy or to implement
the parties presumed intentions
 By customs and usage

Sale of goods act 1979 (SoGA)

- S.2 contract of sale
o 1. A contract of sale of goods is a contract by which the seller transfers or
agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a money
consideration, called the price.

Statutory implied terms
- SoGA
o Implies terms into all contracts for the sale of goods between businesses
- The consumers rights act 2015 (CRA)
o Implies terms into all consumer contracts for the sale of goods

S(12) title
- Implied condition that the seller has the right to sell
- Implied warranty that the goods are sold free from encumbrances

- Rowland v divall (1923) – div got a car and sold it to row when div bought the car he
didn’t realise it had been stolen and he ought it of the thief and then sold it on but
then the police were looking for it and found it and repossess it. Row is upset as he
paid for it but it got taken. Div said he sold it in good faith how should he have
known. Term implied is that the title of the car owner passes with the car but this
didn’t happen and therefore a breach of the contract so he got his money back.


S(13) description
- Implied term that where goods are sold by description they will match that
description

- Harlingdon & leinster enterprises ltd v Christopher hull fine art ltd (1991)

o Two galleries one putting a painting up for auction the other with a particular
interest in the artist. Listed as genuine painting. Specialists sent to look at the
painting and agree its genuine. They go to the auction buy the painting and
then find out it’s a fake. They try suing for the description. Court held that
although it was a fake the defendant didn’t rely on the description but rather
their own specialists. Needs to be a description and reliance in the
description
£3.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
harveygurner2

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
MN10442 company law bundle
-
11 2023
£ 43.89 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
harveygurner2 University of Bath
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
30
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions