100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

Tort law

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
02-04-2023
Written in
2021/2022

describes tort law and explains the defences









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 2, 2023
Number of pages
2
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
Michaela parkin
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Mn10442 – feb 11th

Tort law – ‘tortious liability arises from breach of duty imposed by law and its breach is
resolved by an action for unliquidated damages’
Breach – broken ones obligation
Damages – compensation/money
Tortfeasor – one who commits tort
Tortious – having the nature of a tort, wrongful act

Covers situations such as -
Ø somebody injured in a road traffic accident;
Ø a famous actor libelled by a newspaper;
Ø an employee injured at work;
Ø a landowner who has had a trespasser on his or her land; or
Ø a patient who is injured by a negligent doctor.

The aim of tort damages:
 So far as possible, to place the injured party into the position (financially) they would
be if the tort had never been committed.
 The common law remedy, as of right, to the successful party.

Time limit to bring claim for damages are –
• 3 years : personal injury
• 6 years : all other torts
Claims for equitable remedies have no formal limits but delay defeats equity.

Defences
 Contributory negligence
 Volenti non fit injuria
 Ex turpi causa non oritur action
 Act of God
 Personal defence
 Necessity


Contributory negligence
 Where harm is attributable partly to the fault of the defendant and partly to tht of
the claimant
 Any award of damages may be reduced by reason of the claimants contributory
negligence – e.g. not wearing a seatbelt = 25% reduction
- Jackson v murray (2015) – secondary school girl getting off a bus murray driving
under the speed limit the girl walks out and gets hit originally reduced by 10% and he
appealed and then it was reduced further and eventually it was decided that it was
50/50
- Nettleship v western (1971) –western learner driver crashes and crushes the
teachers knee but she said the teacher should have intervened so it was reduced.
£3.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
harveygurner2

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
MN10442 company law bundle
-
11 2023
£ 43.89 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
harveygurner2 University of Bath
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
30
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions