100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

CIE AS LEVEL History 9489: The League of Nations and International Relations in the 20s

Rating
3.0
(1)
Sold
1
Pages
18
Uploaded on
10-03-2023
Written in
2022/2023

In-depth notes about the international option for CIE AS LEVEL history . This contains Unit 2 only about the League of Nations and International Relations in the 1920s. Contains key dates, perspectives and significance of events











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 10, 2023
Number of pages
18
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
X
Contains
All classes

Content preview

POSTED BY: Khadija Awad


PAPER TWO: ESSAY PAPER
1919: the world war had ended and the Treaty of Versailles had aimed to properly
punish and reprimand the Triple Alliance’s Germany and its actions in the war

Kiel Mutiny: a revolution caused by German ship sailors who didn’t want to follow
commandments of German generals to attack British naval troops. It sparked in
Germany and caused a revolution which established the abdication of Kaisar Wilheim
and allowed for groups of politicians to establish governments. The result was the
unification of the Weimar Republic


Reasons for the fast action for the treaty:
1- Fear of delay: communism would increase as the poor would move towards following
the Russian revolution-> Bolsheviks
2- Wanting powers union: Italy, France, Britain, USA
3- Didn’t have a strong army: to re-enter the war after the Armistice to defeat Germany
and force them to sign the treaty

All the four allied countries (F,B,USA,I) agreed that Germany should pay reparations for
war, be punished for war and be prevented from beginning another world war
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk set by Germany for Russia was set as the baseline for the
TOV: Russia had lost 25% of it’s population compared to the 10% loss in Germany from TOV

However, each power had differences in the approaches about how Germany should be
dealt with
German territories Arms Reparations Guilt Clause League of
Nations

UK The UK wanted Germany to Wanted to reduce the The UK agreed with The British public
lose its colonies as they German navy to the principle of demanded for
threatened the British empire, remove any threat on reparations to repay LLoyd George to
as a point of personal interest Britain’s naval winning countries for ‘squeeze
superiority their economic Germany like a
losses but wanted to lemon’ and the
keep them as low as public demanded
possible to help the for a harsh treaty
German economy that would blame
recover for trade Germany for war

France Wanted Germany to be Agreed entirely with Wanted Germany to Clemenceau and “How come Wilson
broken up into several states the decrease of arms pay higher France were needs 14
to reduce their influence and and banning of reparations as biased due to commandments
power. Clemenceau wanted conscription as a way compensation for resentment of two when God almighty
Alsace-Lorraine back from the to maintain French war damage and to previous losses, only needs 10”
Franco-Prussian war of 1871 security against pay off US warloans. could be

, POSTED BY: Khadija Awad


and wanted an independent possible German Was also used as a interpreted that
Rhineland to secure the threats. Also enjoyed way to keep they enjoyed the
safety of France against the demilitarisation of Germany weak blame being
potential war from Germany the Rhineland as it placed upon
protected France from Germany
border threats

USA Wanted to focus on The USA wanted The LON was
rebuilding Europe’s a “fair and just brought up by
post war economies peace” and WW Woodrow Wilson
to prevent poverty, believed that if the who believed it
possibly opposed by treaty was too would be a peace
Britain and France harsh on blame, it negotiator and bod
as the USA hadn’t would eventually for all countries to
lost economically cause bitterness prevent disputes.
from the war for another war Focused heavily on
compared to the self-determination
other Big 3 of successor states
which caused
tension with the
other powers.
However, the USA
rejected the
implementation of
the LON which
could be reason for
it’s failure as the
USA was unable to
uphold the LON


France (Clemenceau): had lost enormous amounts of money, land and soldiers and
wanted Germany to be as weak as possible. Almost ⅔ of the French army were either
killed or wounded during the war. They wanted to continue their alliance with Britain and
the USA for global strength, wanted compensation and wanted Germany to be
separated into several smaller states to remain weak. Wanted the Rhineland to be
separated into another country controlled by the allies but B+USA disagreed. “Germany
should renounce its existence”. Clemenceau viewed Wilson negatively and believed
that the USA shouldn’t have been part of the negotiations as they hadn’t suffered and
that he was being too lenient, “How come Wilson needs 14 commandments when God
almighty only needs 10”. Clemenceau even wanted for the Rhineland to be an
independent state

Britain (Lloyd George): wanted to maintain the balance of power in Europe and to
keep their international empire and feared Communism and Bolshevik in Germany.
Britain wanted Germany to recover economically to purchase British goods but didn’t
want full economic recovery for Germany in order for it not to be a commercial
competitor. They feared power heavily increasing in France and felt as though

, POSTED BY: Khadija Awad


Clemenceau and Wilson had extremely opposing ideas that couldn’t have been
compromised. “It's like sitting between Napoleon and Jesus Christ”
Lloyd George was pressured by the British public to make Germany pay as the public
didn’t sympathise with Germany and had 1 million casualties from the war, “Squeeze
Germany like a lemon”

USA (Woodrow Wilson): focused on free trade and wanted Germany to recover
economically to prevent poverty and another war. Aimed for the LON to be the
peacekeeper and guarantee of security for France and the world. Wanted a ‘fair peace’
and said “A treaty based on just, not bitterness” “Fair and lasting peace”

Germany: had expected negotiations to occur based on the 14 points speech in
January 1918, which was the main reason the armistice was signed in November 1918.
They also felt they would be compensated for the naval blockade in the Baltic sea. Had
underestimated the hatred felt by the French for the loss of the Alsace Lorraine in the
Franco-Prussian war of 1871
● The German delegation had been taken by train through the most exhausting
areas in France because of war-> used as a manipulation tactic to show the
destruction caused by ‘German’ war

What problems confronted the Big Three:
Public opinions towards the Big Three: with voters putting pressure on leaders,
American’s wanted to return to isolationism, British public wanted to ‘squeeze
Germany like a lemon’
New republics, democracies and Communist states: Russian revolution,
abdication of German Kaizar, formation of Yugoslavia
Rushed decisions and promise to Japan and Italy: felt the need to abide by
promises
Changed balance of power: USA became a major global power due to loans
towards Europe from the USA

The Treaty of Versailles:
Section One: focused on setting up the League of Nations and the structure and role of
the LON when resolving war
TOV: GARGLE (German territories, army, reparations, guilt clause, league of nations)
- Germany lost 13% of its land and 10% of its population
- Anchluss was forbidden between the Hapsburg empire and Germany
- The Saarland was given to the LON for 15 years
- Polish corridor and Upper Silesia were given to Poland
- Lost international colonies to Britain, France and Japan
£5.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
khadija0awad
3.0
(1)

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
CIE AS LEVEL History 9489: Unit 1,2,3 of International Option
-
5 3 2023
£ 16.47 More info

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 year ago

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
khadija0awad
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
9
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
8
Documents
8
Last sold
2 months ago
Khadija\\\'s notes

Sells IGCSE CIE 0450 notes

3.0

1 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions