100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MRL3701 EXAM PACK ANSWERS AND 2021 BRIEF NOTES.

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
1
Pages
87
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
05-06-2022
Written in
2020/2021

MRL3701 EXAM PACK ANSWERS AND 2021 BRIEF NOTES. Study unit 12 - MEETINGS OF CREDITORS AND PROOF OF CLAIMS You are the trustee of Tenza’s insolvent estate. You have discovered that Tenza paid Bobby, Cynthia, and Donald within six months of the sequestration of his estate, for reasons that remain unclear. You wish to question Bobby, Cynthia, and Donald about these payments. On what occasions could they be questioned? Because a trustee has been appointed in respect of Tenza’s insolvent estate the first meeting of creditors (at which the trustee is elected) has already been held (see Hockly 9.1.1). Bobby, Cynthia, and Donald could still be interrogated at a second meeting or a general meeting of creditors (s 65(1)). But they could not be questioned at a special meeting called for the sole purpose of interrogating Tenza (see Hockly 9.1.3(ii)). Downloaded by Alexandria The great () lOMoARcPSD| 39 SELF-TEST QUESTIONS (1) Name the various types of creditors’ meetings. (4) (1) The first meeting, the second meeting, a special meeting, and a general meeting. (2) State one similarity and two differences between a first meeting of creditors and a second meeting of creditors. (5) (2) At both meetings, creditors may prove their claims against the estate. One difference is that the first meeting is convened by the Master, but the second is convened by the trustee. A second difference is that at the first meeting the creditors elect the trustee, but at the second they receive his report and give him directions for the administration of the estate. (3) State three requirements for convening a special meeting of creditors to interrogate the insolvent. (3) (3) The Master must consent to the meeting. Due notice of the meeting must be published in the Government Gazette. And only the insolvent may be interrogated. (4) State the law on the interrogation of witnesses at a general meeting. (2) (4) A general meeting may not be convened solely for the purpose of interrogating witnesses. But witnesses may be interrogated at a general meeting properly called “for the purpose of giving the trustee directions”. (5) Briefly state the law and practice concerning the venue of creditors’ meetings. (2) (5) The Insolvency Act merely requires that meetings be held in a place accessible to the public. In practice, meetings are held at the Master’s office or the magistrate’s office. (6) Who presides over a meeting of creditors? (5) (6) If the district has a Master’s office the Master or the person in the public service designated by him presides. If the district lacks a Master’s office the local magistrate or the person in the public service designated by him presides. If the meeting is held in a district which lacks a Master and someone other than the magistrate presides at the meeting the presiding officer must record why the magistrate did not preside over the meeting. (7) Indicate whether the following statement is true or false. If a creditor considers that the minutes of a creditors’ meeting do not adequately show that, in that meeting, the insolvent admitted inheriting a house, that creditor may give evidence himself before the Master to prove the admission made by the insolvent at the creditors’ meeting. (2) (7) This statement is true. The minutes of the creditors’ meeting constitute prima facie evidence of the proceedings (s 68(1) of the Insolvency Act). The minutes are not incontrovertible (incontestable) proof, and there is no bar to the leading of extraneous evidence to establish that the minutes do not correctly record what transpired at the meeting and what did, in fact, occur (Pine Village Home Owners Association Ltd & others v The Master and others 2001 (2) SA 576 (SE) 580). See Hockly 9.1.5(iii). Accordingly, the creditor in question may give evidence himself about what happened at the creditors’ meeting. This evidence is extraneous because it is not comprised in, and does not form part of, the minutes of the meeting. Which requirements must the plaintiff prove when bringing the actio Pauliana? (4) 1. The transaction diminished the debtor's assets (1) 2. The person who received from the debtor did not receive his own property (1) 3. There was an intention to defraud; (1) 4. The fraud took effect (1) Downloaded by Alexandria The great () lOMoARcPSD| 40 On the receipt of a final sequestration order, the Master is obliged to convene immediately, by notice in the Gazette, a ____________________ of creditors of the estate.(2) First Meeting The common-law remedy which is used with regard to the disposition in fraud of creditors is also known as the actio ______________________. (2)

Show more Read less
Institution
Module











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
June 5, 2022
Number of pages
87
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

lOMoARcPSD|4596927




MRL3701-exam notes consisting of questions and answers


Insolvency Law (University of South Africa)




StuDocu is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university
Downloaded by Alexandria The great ()

, lOMoARcPSD|4596927




1


Study unit 1 INTRODUCTION TO INSOLVENCY LAW

Identify the problem faced by the court in Magnum Financial Holdings.
The only problem before the court was whether a trust could, at law, be sequestrated.

Summarise the authority which the court relied on to solve the problem which it faced.
No South African case seemed to have dealt with whether a trust could be
sequestrated in terms of section 9(1) read with the definition of “debtor” in section 2 of
16 the Insolvency Act. Therefore the court relied on Ex parte Milton NO 1959 (3) SA 347
(SR). In that case, the Southern Rhodesian court, interpreting a similarly worded
section of the Rhodesian statute, approved the voluntary surrender of the estate of an
administrative trust created by contract. The trust fell within the definition of a “debtor”
and could be described as a debtor in the usual sense of the word. Through its
trustee, the trust could borrow money and, as a property owner, be liable for rates
and taxes. Creditors would be paid only from the trust’s property. The trustee was not
personally liable for debts which he incurred on the trust’s behalf. A concursus
creditorum could not be established by sequestrating the estates of the donor of the
trust property, the trust beneficiaries, or the trustee. By way of comparison, the
Rhodesian court also relied on South African decisions concerning a club which
owned property apart from its members, who were not liable for its debts beyond the
amount of their subscriptions. Such a club was a debtor within the meaning of the
Insolvency Act, and its estate could therefore be sequestrated.
Explain the common-law meaning of the phrase “any body corporate”.
The court gave the common-law meaning of “any body corporate” as an association
of individuals capable of holding property and of suing and being sued in its corporate
name, or a universitas having the capacity to acquire certain rights apart from the
rights of the individuals which form it, and having perpetual succession (ie,
continuous existence).

(1) Explain the main purpose of a sequestration order in respect of Tenza’s estate. (2)
The main purpose of a sequestration order is to ensure the orderly and fair
distribution of a debtor’s (Tenza’s) assets if his assets are not sufficient to pay all his
creditors in full.

(2) Give reasons why a sequestration order may not be granted if a debtor has only one
creditor or if there are not enough assets to cover the costs of sequestration. (3)
If a debtor has only one creditor, there are no conflicting interests between creditors
which must be equitably resolved. If the debtor’s assets are not sufficient to cover the
costs of sequestration, creditors will derive no advantage from the process of
sequestration. Consequently, in such a case sequestration would merely amount to a
waste of time and money.

(3) Explain whether a debtor whose estate is under sequestration may obtain a new
estate which does not form part of the sequestrated estate. (2)
Because some assets which a debtor has or acquires do not form part of his
insolvent estate, it is indeed possible to build up a new estate which does not form
part of the estate under sequestration.

(4) Suppose that Bonzo Ltd is a British company which owns property which is lying in a
warehouse in Cape Town harbour. Bonzo Ltd does not, however, have a place of business in South
Africa.

(a) Briefly explain whether the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town has jurisdiction to liquidate
Bonzo Ltd. (2)


Downloaded by Alexandria The great ()

, lOMoARcPSD|4596927




2


Because Bonzo Ltd does not have a place of business in South Africa, a South African court will not
have jurisdiction to wind up the company.

(b) Will the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town have jurisdiction to sequestrate
Bonzo Ltd’s estate? (5)
Because the company may not be wound up in terms of the Companies Act, it is a “debtor” for the
purposes of the Insolvency Act. The estate of the company may therefore be sequestrated by a
South African court. Because the company owns property which is situated within the area of
jurisdiction of the Western Cape High Court, Cape Town, that court will have jurisdiction to
sequestrate the company’s estate.

(c) Will the Cape Town Magistrate’s Court have jurisdiction to sequestrate Bonzo Ltd’s estate? (1)
A magistrate’s court has no jurisdiction to grant an order of sequestration.

(5) When will a formal defect in an application for the sequestration of an estate be fatal? (2)
A formal defect in an application will be fatal if the defect causes a substantial injustice to creditors
and that prejudice cannot be put right by a court order.

(6) Indicate whether the following statement is true or false.
In common parlance, a person may be said to be insolvent when his liabilities, fairly
estimated, exceed his assets, fairly valued. (2)
This statement is false. In common parlance, a person may be said to be insolvent when he is unable
to pay his debts. The legal test of insolvency, however, is whether the debtor’s liabilities, fairly
estimated, exceed his assets, fairly valued

The ___________________ of insolvency is whether the debtor's liabilities, fairly
estimated, exceed his assets, fairly valued. (2)
Legal test

Exam 2002

What is the definition of a “debtor” in terms of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936? (4)
A debtor means a person or a partnership or the estate of a person or a partnership
which is a debtor in the usual sense of the word, except a body corporate or a
company or other association of persons which may be placed in liquidation under the
law relating to companies.




(a) Why was the court in Magnum Financial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) v Summerly
and another 1984 (1) SA 160 (W) satisfied that the applicants had made out a case for
the relief sought (the urgent grant of a provisional sequestration order)? (6)
There had been sufficient service of the papers on the trustee of the trust.
The one provisional liquidator of the applicant company had locus standi to apply for
the provisional sequestration of the trust estate.
The applicant company had a claim against the trust for about R1,6 million which was
due and payable.
An act of insolvency in terms of section 8(g) of the Insolvency Act had been committed,
and the trust estate was also insolvent.
It was to the advantage of the trust’s creditors that its estate should be urgently sequestrated.

Downloaded by Alexandria The great ()

, lOMoARcPSD|4596927




3


The necessary security bond had been lodged.
A trust falls within the definition of a ‘debtor.’

(b) Max Limited is an Canadian company and the owner of property which is in storage in
Cape Town Harbour. Max Limited does not, however, have a place of business in
South Africa. Will the Cape Provincial Division of the High Court have jurisdiction to
sequestrate the estate of Max Limited? Give reasons for your answer. Do not discuss
whether the name of the Provincial Division of the High Court is the correct one.
Further, you must not discuss whether any other court may have jurisdiction to
sequestrate the estate of Max Limited. (5)
As this company cannot be wound up under the Companies Act because it has no
place of business in South Africa, it is therefore a “debtor”for the purposes of the
Insolvency Act (s 2 "debtor") and its estate may therefore be sequestrated by a High
Court in South Africa. Max Ltd owns property situated in the jurisdiction of the Cape
Provincial Division of the High Court, and so the Cape court will have jurisdiction to
sequestrate the company’s estate (s 149(1)(a)).

2009
A person may be insolvent in the sense that his.................................... exceed his
..............................., even though his estate has not yet been sequestrated. In fact,
sequestration will usually be applied for only when the .................................. already exceed the
.....................................
Liabilities: Assets: Liabilities:Assets

(b) The sequestration procedure is aimed mainly at achieving a .......................................... of the
available assets among .....................................of the debtor. (2)
Fair distribution: Competing creditors

(c) An external company may be .................................................. in South Africa (in terms of the
Companies Act 61 of 1973) if it has a place of business in South Africa. If it does not have a
place of business in South Africa, its estate may be
in South Africa under the Insolvency Act, if a South African court has jurisdiction in terms of
section 149 of the Insolvency Act. (2)
Liquidated: Sequestrated

(e) A formal defect in an application for sequestration will be fatal if the defect causes a
substantial injustice to ................................................... and that prejudice cannot be put
right by a .........................................................
Creditors: Court order

(a) An estate is usually conceived of as a collection of.................................................................
and......................................................................................... (2)
(a) Assets (1): Liabilities (1)
Insolvency law provides a procedure for dealing fairly with the claims that the unpaid
__________________ of the insolvent person have against the insolvent estate.
Insolvency law also protects the debtor from being harassed by his or her creditors.(2)
(a) creditors
There are ________ acts of insolvency. (2)
8

Only a ______________________ has jurisdiction to wind up a company. (2)
High Court


Study unit 2-3 VOLUNTARY SURRENDER

Downloaded by Alexandria The great ()

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 month ago

3 weeks ago

Thank you for the Purchase and Excellent Review, I really appreciate your feedback. Incase of more academic materials, do not hesitate to inbox me via this platform. I wish you success in your studies. Welcome again to my page.

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
DoctorReinhad Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2131
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
1728
Documents
6004
Last sold
2 days ago
TOP SELLER CENTER

Welcome All to this page. Here you will find ; ALL DOCUMENTS, PACKAGE DEALS, FLASHCARDS AND 100% REVISED & CORRECT STUDY MATERIALS GUARANTEED A+. NB: ALWAYS WRITE A GOOD REVIEW WHEN YOU FIND MY DOCUMENTS OF SUCCOUR TO YOU. ALSO, REFER YOUR COLLEGUES TO MY ACCOUNT. ( Refer 3 and get 1 free document). AM AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU ANY TIME. WISHING YOU SUCCESS IN YOUR STUDIES. THANK YOU.

3.6

300 reviews

5
130
4
48
3
55
2
17
1
50

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions