Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Criminal

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
11
Uploaded on
17-03-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Basic about criminal law

Content preview

Criminal Law.

Actus Reus-
In criminal law consists of all elements of a crime other than the state of mind of the
defendant. In particular, actus reus may consist of: conduct, result, a state of affairs or an
omission.

Conduct - the conduct itself might be criminal. Eg. the conduct of lying under oath
represents the actus reus of perjury. It does not matter that whether the lie is believed or if
had any effect on the outcome of the case, the actus reus of the crime is complete upon the
conduct.

Examples of conduct crimes:

 Perjury
 Theft
 Making off without payment
 Rape
 Possession of drugs or a firearm


Result - The actus reus may relate to the result of the act or omission of the defendant. The
conduct itself may not be criminal, but the result of the conduct may be. Eg it is not a crime
to throw a stone, but if it hits a person or smashes a window it could amount to a
crime. Causation must be established in all result crimes.

Examples of result crimes:

1. Assault
2. Battery
3. ABH
4. Wounding and GBH
5. Murder & Manslaughter
6. Criminal damage


State of affairs - For state of affairs crimes the actus reus consists of 'being' rather than
'doing'. Eg 'being' drunk in charge of a vehicle (Duck v Peacock [1949] 1 All ER 318 Case
summary) or 'being' an illegal alien (R v Larsonneur (1933) 24 Cr App R 74 case summary).

Omission - Occasionally an omission can amount to the actus reus of a crime. The general
rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. Eg if you see a child
drowning in shallow water and you don't do anything to save that child you will not incur
criminal liability for your inaction no matter how easy it may have been for you to save the
child's life. This general rule however, is subject to exceptions:

, 1. Statutory duty: In some situations there is a statutory duty to act. Eg to provide details of
insurance after a traffic accident or to notify DVLA when you sell a vehicle.

2. Contractual duty: If a person owes a contractual duty to act, then a failure to meet this
contractual duty may result in criminal liability:

R v Pittwood [1902] TLR 37

The defendant was employed by a railway company to man the gate at a level crossing. The
defendant lifted the gate to allow a cart to pass and then went off to lunch failing to put it
back down. A train later collided with a horse and cart killing the train driver. The defendant
was liable for the death of the train driver as it was his contractual duty to close the gate.

3. Duty imposed by law

The actus reus can be committed by an omission where there exists a duty imposed by law.
There are three situations in which a duty may be imposed by law. These are where the
defendant creates a dangerous situation, where there has been a voluntary assumption of
responsibility and misconduct in a public office. Additionally an omission may be classified
as part of a continuing act.


a). Creating a dangerous situation and failing to put it right:

R v Miller [1983] 2 AC 161
The defendant had been out drinking for the evening. He went back to the house he had
been staying in and fell asleep on a mattress with a lighted cigarette in his hand. He awoke
and saw that the cigarette had started a small fire. Upon seeing the fire, he then got up and
went to another room and went back to sleep. At his trial, the prosecution did not rely on
the acts of the defendant in falling asleep with a lighted cigarette as being reckless, but
relied solely on the grounds that upon becoming aware of the fire he failed to take steps to
put the fire out or call the fire brigade. The defendant had created a dangerous situation
and owed a duty to call the fire brigade upon becoming aware of the fire. He was therefore
liable for his omission to do so.


b). Assumption of responsibility:


R v Stone & Dobinson [1977] 1 QB 354

Ted Stone was 67, totally blind, partially deaf had no appreciable sense of smell and was of
low intelligence. He lived with his housekeeper and mistress of 8 years, Gwendolyn
Dobinson aged 43 who was described as ineffectual and inadequate. Ted's sister Fanny
came to live with them. She had previously lived with another sister but had fallen out with
her. She had mental problems and was suffering from anorexia nervosa. Ted and
Gwendolyn took her in and agreed to look after her. However, Fanny's condition

Document information

Uploaded on
March 17, 2022
Number of pages
11
Written in
2021/2022
Type
SUMMARY
£7.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
thaparanaya

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
thaparanaya
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
-
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
21
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions