100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Lecture notes

Perceived vocal attractiveness

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
14-10-2021
Written in
2017/2018

Document covers the implicitly perceived vocal attractiveness and prefrontal cortex activity









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
October 14, 2021
Number of pages
2
Written in
2017/2018
Type
Lecture notes
Professor(s)
Dr patricia bestelmeyer
Contains
All classes

Subjects

Content preview

Implicitly perceived vocal attractiveness modules prefrontal cortex activity
Introduction
- Vocal attractiveness
o informs phenotypic things (health, reproductive fitness)
o linked to increased sexual partners and decreased age of first sexual contact
o credited more socially favourable traits e.g likeability
o ‘’what sounds beautiful is good’’ stereotype
- Behavioural gender-independent mechanisms of vocal beauty
o Morphing voices – the more composites, the more attractive sounding
o Independent acoustic contributors to attractiveness – distance to mean and
spectrotemporal regularity (harmonics to noise ratio)
Methods
- fMRI whilst participants listed to vocal sounds produced by different voices whilst
performing distraction task of tone detection
- voices were independently rated for attractiveness
Findings
- Areas
o despite no linguistic content and tone detection, perceived vocal attractiveness
correlated with activity in a range of networks – higher level auditory cortex
and inferior prefrontal regions
o less attractive voices = greater activity in voice-sensitive areas (bilateral
superior temporal sulci/gyri, respond more to vocal sounds) and right inferior
fusiform gyrus (in Broca’s area linked to speech)
o more attractive voices = increased activation in bilateral fusiform gyrus (helps
in face processing) and left midoccipital regions
- Face and voice
o fMRI findings from this study and facial attractiveness studies could suggest
FG and IFG respond to attractiveness in general, engaging a broad neural
network
o daily parallel processing of face and voice
 reciprocal functional connects suggests auditory input is coupled or
translated into visual representation
- Acoustic contributors
o The more distinct or different a voice from the mean (stereotype) the more
unattractive and more bilateral STS/STG activation
 Speculated like faces, voices coded against prototype
o Irregular texture, unattractive and bilateral STS/STG activation
 texture-sensitive regions are activated parametrically within the
category of human non- speech vocalizations
Conclusions
£4.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
kathryn1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
kathryn1 iTutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
11
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions