Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NR571 Midterm Exam - Complex Diagnosis & Management in Acute Care - Adult-Gerontology Acute Care NP - 2026/2027

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages

Prepare for your NR571 Midterm Exam on Complex Diagnosis & Management in Acute Care with this comprehensive study guide designed for Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner students. This essential 2026/2027 resource covers advanced differential diagnosis, critical care interventions, complex disease management, diagnostic interpretation, evidence-based protocols, and clinical decision-making for acutely ill adult and geriatric patients in hospital settings.

Content preview

NR571 Midterm Exam - Complex Diagnosis &
Management in Acute Care - Adult-Gerontology
Acute Care NP - 2026/2027


40 multiple-choice items | Graduate ACNP level | 100 % clinical-decision focus



SECTION 1 ‑ SHOCK & SEPSIS

Q1

Vignette: 68-year-old man, DM-2, 24 h fever & confusion. T 102.5 °F, HR 128, BP 78/42,
RR 28, SpO₂ 92 % RA. Dry mucous membranes, RLL crackles. WBC 22 k, lactate 5.0
mmol/L, Cr 1.8 mg/dL (baseline 1.0), CXR RLL consolidation.

Question: MOST urgent bundled next step?

A. Blood cultures then vancomycin/piperacillin-tazobactam

B. 30 mL/kg crystalloid bolus AND cultures AND broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 h

C. Start norepinephrine for MAP > 65

D. CT abdomen to rule out intra-abdominal source

Correct: B

Rationale: Septic-shock Hour-1 bundle mandates simultaneous fluid, cultures, and
antibiotics; vasopressors follow if hypotension persists after fluids.

,Q2

Same patient; 2 L NS given in 30 min, BP 74/38, HR 130, urine output 5 mL/h. Central
venous O₂ sat 68 %.

Question: NEXT most appropriate intervention?

A. Add 2 L more NS

B. Start norepinephrine 0.05 μg/kg/min

C. Start dopamine 10 μg/kg/min

D. Give 1 unit PRBC

Correct: B

Rationale: Fluid-refractory septic shock → norepinephrine first-line per Surviving Sepsis;
continued blind fluid risks overload.

Q3

Vignette: 54-year-old woman, HTN, HFpEF, presents 1 h severe chest pain. HR 118, BP
72/48, RR 26, SpO₂ 88 % RA. JVP 14 cm, bilateral crackles, new holosystolic murmur at
apex. CXR pulmonary edema, trop I 8.2 ng/mL, lactate 3.4. Bedside echo: severe MR, EF
35 %.

Question: Which pathophysiologic process BEST explains shock?

A. Hypovolemia from diuresis

B. Cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation

C. Septic shock from unknown source

, D. Massive PE with RV failure

Correct: B

Rationale: Acute MR (papillary-muscle rupture post-MI) causes abrupt LV volume
overload ↓ forward flow → cardiogenic shock.

Q4

Question: MOST appropriate immediate therapy?

A. 1 L NS bolus

B. Start norepinephrine

C. Emerent echocardiography & cardiac surgery consult for possible valve repair

D. Start broad-spectrum antibiotics

Correct: C

Rationale: Acute severe MR is a surgical emergency; temporizing measures (IABP) may
bridge, but definitive repair required.

Q5

Vignette: 29-year-old man, asthma, intubated 2 days ago for severe exacerbation. Now
temp 38.8 °C, BP 86/50, HR 135, SpO₂ 92 % (FiO₂ 0.6, PEEP 10). Peak airway pressure
55 cmH₂O (baseline 35), plateau 38 cmH₂O, new R-sided crackles. WBC 18 k,
procalcitonin 0.9 ng/mL.

Question: NEXT best diagnostic test?

A. Chest CT angiogram

Document information

Uploaded on
January 9, 2026
Number of pages
26
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
£8.75

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PrimeScholars
3.1
(11)
Sold
76
Followers
0
Items
2943
Last sold
6 days ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions