100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CIV1299H - Asset Management: Quantitative tools and methods Final Exam

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
5
Grade
A
Uploaded on
24-03-2023
Written in
2022/2023

Final Exam Questions with Solutions










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
March 24, 2023
Number of pages
5
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

  • final exam

Content preview

CIV 1299: Asset Management: Quantitative Methods & Tools July 2022




Department of Civil Engineering




CIV 1299
ASSET MANAGEMENT: QUANTITATIVE METHODS &
TOOLS
FINAL TAKE HOME EXAM (30 MARKS) – DUE ON JULY 25TH AT 2PM EDT

Instructions:
1- This exam is considered to be individual work. Any form of collaboration, information sharing or
communication between students during the course of this exam will be considered a form of
plagiarism and be dealt with accordingly.
2- If you need to make any assumptions to solve the exam, please make and clearly state those
assumptions.
3- Students should upload one PDF and one Excel file containing their answers to quercus.
4- Students who do not have access to quercus should email their answers to





Page 1 of 5

, CIV 1299: Asset Management: Quantitative Methods & Tools July 2022



Q1 (7 Marks)
As the asset manager for a Canadian city you are considering investment in 6 different projects with the
following information. You are considering utilizing PROMETHEE for the multi-criteria assessment of
different project options.
Project Number of Improvement Improvement Improvement Investment ($
Beneficiaries in service in safety in service millions)
(x1000) availability performance quality
A 2.5 High Very Low Low 4.9
B 9 Very Low Medium Medium 8.7
C 1 Medium Very Low Medium 5.9
D 0.7 Low High High 2.8
E 4 High Medium Low 8.0
F 3.5 Medium Low Very Low 6.9


Indifference threshold Preference threshold
Number of beneficiaries 1,000 3,000
Service/Safety/Quality 1 3
Cost 500,000 2,000,000


Assume High = 10, Medium = 8, Low=4, Very Low =1 and that all decision criteria have the same weight.
a) Formulate the decision problem using PROMETHEE
b) Rank the projects from best to worst using both the PROMETHE I and PROMETHE II criteria
c) As the decision-maker facilitating this decision within the City comment on
a. the difficulties you would face to collect the data required to drive this decision
b. the potential criticisms could be addressed to this particular decision-making method




Page 2 of 5
CA$21.92
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
xxxxxx1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
xxxxxx1 University of Toronto
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
3
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
2
Documents
44
Last sold
4 months ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions