Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 44 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Bioethics Exam Questions with Correct Answers | Updated (100% Correct Answers)

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 44 pages

Bioethics Exam Questions with Correct Answers | Updated (100% Correct Answers)

Content preview

1


Bioethics Exam Questions with Correct
Answers | Updated (100% Correct Answers)
What are the characteristics of good reasons in ethics? Answer: -
relevant to position

-provide evidence for a position

-support a conclusion as an argument

-appeals not to evidence but to a principle

-should not contradict each other and be logically consistent

truth Answer: how premises correspond or not to the world

validity Answer: the formal relations between premises and
conclusion

Slippery slope Answer: argument that a small change in the current
practice will lead to terrible results; no logical place to draw the line

Conceptual Answer: once a small change is made, other changes
will logically follow, appeals to something good in human nature

Empirical Answer: taking the first step unleashes something bad in
human nature

Ad hominem Answer: - "to the man"

© 2025 All rights reserved

,2
-a personal attack on someone else

Tu quoque Answer: --"you too"

--two wrongs make a right

--Justifying our actions by claiming that others have committed the
same wrong

Straw man/Red herring Answer: bringing up irrelevant issues;
focusing on different issue than one originally advocated because
the different issue is easier to refute

ex) "We should reject Obamacare because it will lead to death
panels where people are forced to have advance directives before
they know they are dying or know what their options are."

straw man Answer: --"So you're saying I evolved from a monkey?
Then how come I don't throw feces and climb trees?"

--Evolution doesn't make that claim, but by claiming that it does,
the arguer is trying to beat down a much easier argument.

Red Herring Answer: --"So you believe in evolution? I'll bet your
parents would be disappointed in you."

--The arguer is distracting from the issue by bringing his opponent's
parents into this - they have no impact on whether or not the
theory is correct.

© 2025 All rights reserved

,3
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc Answer: --"After This, Therefore,
Because of This"

--confuses temporal priority with causality

--ex) "In the 1960s, women started working outside the home, and a
few years later, rates of divorce soared. Therefore, if we want to
preserve the family, we should prevent women from working
outside the home."

--Just because one event occurred before another does not mean
the first was caused by the second ---- everything in history came
before X event, it does not mean that they are correlated

Appeal to authority Answer: --using any authority to justify an
argument

--Ex) Using an ant expert's opinion on rock bands

--Reasons and arguments justify a position, not just any authority

Appeal to feelings and upbringing Answer: --using personal feelings
or upbringing to justify something

--Ex) "I was brought up to believe that men were the hunters and
women were the hunted, so a woman should wait until a man finds
her and asks her out."

--You can be brought up the wrong way

© 2025 All rights reserved

, 4
Ad populum Answer: --everybody does it

--Ex) "All the other physicians do it. Why shouldn't I take such gifts,
too?"

False dichotomy Answer: --"Either-Or"

--presenting an issue with only two extremes

Equivocation Answer: --use of ambiguous language to conceal the
truth

--Ex) "Sex offenders should only be allowed to live in certain areas,
so Alan Jones should not live here."

Begging the question Answer: --when a conclusion that requires
good reasons is assumed without argument

--Ex) Saying only humans can be persons is begging the question
which is whether only humans can be persons

moral relativism Answer: --saying that right and wrong is internally
defined by each society/culture so we can't judge other cultures for
their practices because all of our moral systems are right

--may sound nice in theory but in practice it allows for the Nazis to
be justified because "we can't judge that culture"

utilitarianism Answer: gggn

© 2025 All rights reserved

Document information

Uploaded on
January 16, 2026
Number of pages
44
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
CA$19.96

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Passit
3.5
(23)
Sold
128
Followers
6
Items
14486
Last sold
1 week ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions