100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank (Ignatavicius 11th Edition) — Comprehensive NCLEX & HESI Review for RN/BSN/MSN, 20 Qs/Chapter, Verified Rationales

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
425
Grado
A+
Subido en
25-10-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank (Ignatavicius 11th Edition) — Comprehensive NCLEX & HESI Review for RN/BSN/MSN, 20 Qs/Chapter, Verified Rationales Description: Struggling with test anxiety or unsure which Med-Surg topics deserve the most study time? This complete Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank—built from Ignatavicius, Rebar & Heimgartner (11th ed.)—gives you a focused, evidence-based path to NCLEX and HESI success. Aligned to the 2025 NCLEX-RN Test Plan and current interprofessional care standards, this resource delivers trusted practice and teaching you can rely on. What you get: • 20 NCLEX/HESI-style multiple-choice questions per chapter—realistic, scenario-based items that build clinical judgment and prioritization skills. • Verified rationales written and peer-reviewed by nurse educators—clear explanations for correct and incorrect options to deepen understanding. • Emphasis on patient safety, clinical judgment (ADPIE), pharmacology, pathophysiology, and interprofessional collaborative care—so you practice what matters on exam day and in real clinical settings. • Designed for RN, BSN, MSN students, and certification candidates—use for course review, clinical prep, HESI remediation, or final NCLEX practice. Why it works: This test bank focuses on higher-order reasoning (application, analysis, evaluation) rather than rote memorization—so you learn to think like an RN. Each question mirrors exam formatting and includes rationales that reinforce safe practice and evidence-based decision making. Use it chapter-by-chapter alongside Ignatavicius 11th Edition or as a targeted NCLEX Review tool to build confidence and reduce last-minute stress. Outcomes you can expect: Master core medical-surgical concepts, improve time management under pressure, and raise your question-level reasoning for HESI and NCLEX success. Build confidence, reduce stress, and master every medical-surgical concept with practice that matters. Start preparing smarter today—download the complete Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank and turn study time into exam success. (Primary keywords included: Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank, NCLEX Review, Ignatavicius 11th Edition, Verified Rationales) Hashtags (10): [#NCLEX #NursingStudents #MedSurgNursing #HESIReview #Ignatavicius11thEdition #NursingSchool #RNExamPrep #TestBank #StudySmarter #NursingEducation] Keywords (20): [Medical-Surgical Nursing Test Bank, Ignatavicius 11th Edition questions, NCLEX Med-Surg review, HESI practice questions, verified rationales, nursing exam prep, clinical judgment MCQs, RN study guide, medical surgical care review, evidence-based nursing test bank, Med-Surg 20 questions per chapter, interprofessional collaborative care review, patient safety NCLEX, HESI Med-Surg practice, NCLEX question bank Ignatavicius, RN BSN MSN exam prep, priority setting NCLEX questions, pathophysiology and pharmacology review, high-yield MedSurg test bank, verified rationales for HESI]

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Nclex
Grado
Nclex

Vista previa del contenido

Medical-Surgical Nursing: Concepts for Interprofessional
Collaborative Care (11th Ed.),


Unit II: Emergency Care & Disaster Preparedness.


Medical-Surgical Nursing
11th Edition
• Author(s)Donna D. Ignatavicius; Cherie R. Rebar; Nicole M.
Heimgartner




Reference: Ch. 10: Concepts of Emergency and Trauma Nursing
— Triage and Prioritization
Question Stem: An ED triage nurse receives three incoming
patients: (1) a 68-year-old with chest pain and diaphoresis, (2) a
24-year-old with an isolated closed femur fracture after a fall,
and (3) a 40-year-old complaining of mild sore throat and low-
grade fever. Which patient should be triaged to receive
immediate evaluation first?
A. 68-year-old with chest pain and diaphoresis
B. 24-year-old with closed femur fracture
C. 40-year-old with sore throat and fever
D. All should be seen simultaneously

,Correct Answer: A
Rationales:
• Correct (A): Chest pain with diaphoresis suggests possible
acute coronary syndrome; immediate evaluation and
treatment (ECG, aspirin, oxygen as indicated) reduce
morbidity and mortality. Triage prioritizes
airway/breathing/circulation threats.
• B: Femur fracture is urgent for analgesia and stabilization
but not immediately life-threatening if airway and
breathing intact.
• C: Mild sore throat/low-grade fever is low acuity and can
wait.
• D: Resource triage requires prioritization; simultaneous
evaluation of all is impractical and unsafe.
Teaching Point: Prioritize potential life-threatening conditions
(ABC + major ischemia).
Citation: Ignatavicius, Rebar, & Heimgartner, 2024, Ch. 10:
Concepts of Emergency and Trauma Nursing


2
Reference: Ch. 10: Concepts of Emergency and Trauma Nursing
— Primary/Secondary Survey (ABCDE)
Question Stem: A trauma patient arrives after a motor vehicle
crash. During the primary survey the nurse notes weak

,peripheral pulses and cool, pale skin with tachycardia. What
action should the nurse perform next?
A. Complete a full head-to-toe secondary survey
B. Apply two large-bore IVs and begin isotonic fluid
resuscitation
C. Obtain a CT scan of the head and chest
D. Administer analgesic for pain control
Correct Answer: B
Rationales:
• Correct (B): Signs suggest hypovolemia/shock; during the
primary survey, immediate establishment of large-bore IV
access and isotonic crystalloid (or blood as indicated) to
restore perfusion takes priority.
• A: Secondary survey is done after stabilization of airway,
breathing, and circulation.
• C: Imaging is deferred until patient is hemodynamically
stable.
• D: Analgesia is important but circulatory stabilization is
higher priority in shock.
Teaching Point: In trauma, secure perfusion (C) before
diagnostic evaluation.
Citation: Ignatavicius et al., 2024, Ch. 10: Primary and
Secondary Surveys

, 3
Reference: Ch. 10: Concepts of Emergency and Trauma Nursing
— Burns and Fluid Management
Question Stem: A 35-year-old with partial- and full-thickness
burns of the anterior torso (18% TBSA) arrives. Which initial
nursing intervention most directly reduces risk of burn shock?
A. Apply topical silver sulfadiazine to burned areas
B. Start fluid resuscitation using Parkland formula calculation
and 2 large-bore IVs
C. Cover burns with dry sterile dressings only
D. Give oral ibuprofen for pain control
Correct Answer: B
Rationales:
• Correct (B): Burn injuries >15% TBSA risk hypovolemia;
Parkland formula guides early crystalloid resuscitation and
requires prompt IV access to prevent burn shock.
• A: Topical antimicrobial is appropriate but not first line to
prevent shock.
• C: Covering burns protects from contamination but doesn't
address systemic hypovolemia.
• D: Oral analgesia insufficient; IV analgesia/airway/fluids
prioritized.
Teaching Point: Large TBSA burns need immediate fluid
resuscitation to prevent burn shock.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Nclex
Grado
Nclex

Información del documento

Subido en
25 de octubre de 2025
Número de páginas
425
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas
$30.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
NursingPrepMadeEasy

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
NursingPrepMadeEasy Princeton
Ver perfil
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
0
Miembro desde
7 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
169
Última venta
-
NursingPrepMadeEasy

Targeted nursing test banks with textbook-aligned questions and NCLEX-style MCQs built for nursing exams and assessment success. Practical, high-yield nursing study resources that improve accuracy, confidence, and outcomes. Designed to help you study smarter and pass with confidence.

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes