MODULE : PYC3701
,PYC3701 Exam
Study Pack
Contains:
✓ Comprehensive Study Notes
✓ Exam MCQ’s with Solutions
✓ eBook Social Psychology 14th Ed.
,2: SOCIAL COGNITION: HOW WE
THINK ABOUT THE WORLD
SU 2.1. SCHEMAS: MENTAL FRAMEWORKS FOR
ORGANISING – AND USING – SOCIAL INFORMATION
Schemas: Mental frameworks centering on a specific theme that help us to organize
social information.
THE IMPACT OF SCHEMAS ON SOCIAL COGNITION:
ATTENTION, ENCODING, RETRIEVAL
Schemas influence attention (the information we notice, for which schemas act as filters),
encoding (the process by which information gets stored in memory), and retrieval.
Information inconsistent with schemas is more likely to be noticed and to enter our
consciousness.
We rely most on schemas when we are experiencing cognitive load (a lot of information
at once).
Information that is consistent with our schemas is encoded. Information that is sharply
inconsistent with our schemas may be encoded into a separate memory location and
marked with a unique “tag”.
Regarding memory: In general, people report remembering more information consistent
with their schemas, but information inconsistent with their schemas may be strongly
present in memory too.
PRIMING: WHICH SCHEMAS GUIDE OUR THOUGHT?
Priming: a situation that occurs when stimuli or events increase the availability in
memory or consciousness of specific types of information held in memory. Schemas can
be temporarily activated by priming.
Unpriming: Refers to the fact that the effects of the schemas tend to persist until they
are somehow expressed in thought or behaviour and only then do their effects decrease.
If primed schemas are not expressed, their effects may persist for long periods of time.
The stronger and better-developed our schemas are, the more likely they are to influence
our thinking, and especially our memory for social information.
SCHEMA PERSISTENCE: WHY EVEN DISCREDITED SCHEMAS
CAN SOMETIMES INFLUENCE OUR THOUGHT BEHAVIOUR
© 2015 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
, Perseverance effect: The tendency for beliefs and schemas to remain unchanged even
in the face of contradictory information.
Evidence suggests that schemas can be self-fulfilling – they both shape and reflect the
social world.
Schemas help us make sense of the social world and process information efficiently, but
they can also lock us into acting in ways that create the world we expect.
REASONING BY METAPHOR: HOW SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND
BEHAVIOUR ARE AFFECTED BY FIGURES OF SPEECH
Metaphor: A linguistic device that relates or draws a comparison between one abstract
thought and another dissimilar concept.
Because metaphors can activate different kinds of social knowledge, they can influence
how we interpret events.
SU 2.2. HEURISTICS: HOW WE REDUCE OUR EFFORT IN
SOCIAL COGNITION
Social cognition: The manner in which we interpret, analyse, remember, and use
information about the social world.
Heuristics: Simple rules for making complex decisions or drawing inferences in a rapid
and seemingly effortless manner.
Affect: our current feelings and moods.
When we are subjected to more information than what we are capable of processing at
one time, this results in information overload.
Processing capacity can be diminished by stress levels.
We rely on heuristics because they allow us to do more, with less effort.
REPRESENTATIVENESS: JUDGING BY RESEMBLANCE
Prototype: Summary of the common attributes possessed by members of a category.
Representativeness heuristic: A strategy for making judgements based on the extent to
which current stimuli or events resemble other stimuli or categories.
Decisions based on the representative heuristic can be wrong, because they tend to
ignore base rates.
Base rates: the frequency with which given events or patterns occur in the total
population.
Cultural groups differ in the extent to which they rely on the representative heuristic and
expect “like to go with like” in terms of causes and effects.
Compared to North Americans, Asians rely less on the representative heuristic.
© 2015 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
,PYC3701 Exam
Study Pack
Contains:
✓ Comprehensive Study Notes
✓ Exam MCQ’s with Solutions
✓ eBook Social Psychology 14th Ed.
,2: SOCIAL COGNITION: HOW WE
THINK ABOUT THE WORLD
SU 2.1. SCHEMAS: MENTAL FRAMEWORKS FOR
ORGANISING – AND USING – SOCIAL INFORMATION
Schemas: Mental frameworks centering on a specific theme that help us to organize
social information.
THE IMPACT OF SCHEMAS ON SOCIAL COGNITION:
ATTENTION, ENCODING, RETRIEVAL
Schemas influence attention (the information we notice, for which schemas act as filters),
encoding (the process by which information gets stored in memory), and retrieval.
Information inconsistent with schemas is more likely to be noticed and to enter our
consciousness.
We rely most on schemas when we are experiencing cognitive load (a lot of information
at once).
Information that is consistent with our schemas is encoded. Information that is sharply
inconsistent with our schemas may be encoded into a separate memory location and
marked with a unique “tag”.
Regarding memory: In general, people report remembering more information consistent
with their schemas, but information inconsistent with their schemas may be strongly
present in memory too.
PRIMING: WHICH SCHEMAS GUIDE OUR THOUGHT?
Priming: a situation that occurs when stimuli or events increase the availability in
memory or consciousness of specific types of information held in memory. Schemas can
be temporarily activated by priming.
Unpriming: Refers to the fact that the effects of the schemas tend to persist until they
are somehow expressed in thought or behaviour and only then do their effects decrease.
If primed schemas are not expressed, their effects may persist for long periods of time.
The stronger and better-developed our schemas are, the more likely they are to influence
our thinking, and especially our memory for social information.
SCHEMA PERSISTENCE: WHY EVEN DISCREDITED SCHEMAS
CAN SOMETIMES INFLUENCE OUR THOUGHT BEHAVIOUR
© 2015 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
, Perseverance effect: The tendency for beliefs and schemas to remain unchanged even
in the face of contradictory information.
Evidence suggests that schemas can be self-fulfilling – they both shape and reflect the
social world.
Schemas help us make sense of the social world and process information efficiently, but
they can also lock us into acting in ways that create the world we expect.
REASONING BY METAPHOR: HOW SOCIAL ATTITUDES AND
BEHAVIOUR ARE AFFECTED BY FIGURES OF SPEECH
Metaphor: A linguistic device that relates or draws a comparison between one abstract
thought and another dissimilar concept.
Because metaphors can activate different kinds of social knowledge, they can influence
how we interpret events.
SU 2.2. HEURISTICS: HOW WE REDUCE OUR EFFORT IN
SOCIAL COGNITION
Social cognition: The manner in which we interpret, analyse, remember, and use
information about the social world.
Heuristics: Simple rules for making complex decisions or drawing inferences in a rapid
and seemingly effortless manner.
Affect: our current feelings and moods.
When we are subjected to more information than what we are capable of processing at
one time, this results in information overload.
Processing capacity can be diminished by stress levels.
We rely on heuristics because they allow us to do more, with less effort.
REPRESENTATIVENESS: JUDGING BY RESEMBLANCE
Prototype: Summary of the common attributes possessed by members of a category.
Representativeness heuristic: A strategy for making judgements based on the extent to
which current stimuli or events resemble other stimuli or categories.
Decisions based on the representative heuristic can be wrong, because they tend to
ignore base rates.
Base rates: the frequency with which given events or patterns occur in the total
population.
Cultural groups differ in the extent to which they rely on the representative heuristic and
expect “like to go with like” in terms of causes and effects.
Compared to North Americans, Asians rely less on the representative heuristic.
© 2015 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
