1
Border Patrol Practice Exam Questions
and Verified Answers Updated 2025.
Graded A
.35 + .78 = ? - ANS 1.13
.69 - .14 = ? - ANS.55
(3/7) * (2/4) = ? - ANS3/14
(5/8) / (3/4) = ? - ANS5/6
1/3 + 1/2 + 3/4 = ? - ANS19/12
16% of 40 = ? - ANS6.40
2.64 / .02 = ? - ANS132
24 hours = __ day - ANS1 day
25.164 / .06 = ? - ANS419.4
4/5 - 1/3 = ? - ANS7/15
5/8 + 6/8 = ? - ANS11/8
1
, 2
57% = ? - ANS.57
6.021 * .4 = ? - ANS2.4084
60 minutes = __ hour - ANS1 hour
60 seconds = __ minute(s) - ANS1 minute
A passenger purchased a vase from an art dealer for $1,210. She later
learned that the dealer sold her the vase for 110% of its actual value. What
was the actual value of the vase? - ANS1,100
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-
mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never
be said face-to-face or written formally.
What cannot be a Validly Conclusion?
A) Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-
face
2
, 3
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-
mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted f - ANSA
A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the
company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for
cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by
a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage
as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo
was also damaged.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - ANSC
3
Border Patrol Practice Exam Questions
and Verified Answers Updated 2025.
Graded A
.35 + .78 = ? - ANS 1.13
.69 - .14 = ? - ANS.55
(3/7) * (2/4) = ? - ANS3/14
(5/8) / (3/4) = ? - ANS5/6
1/3 + 1/2 + 3/4 = ? - ANS19/12
16% of 40 = ? - ANS6.40
2.64 / .02 = ? - ANS132
24 hours = __ day - ANS1 day
25.164 / .06 = ? - ANS419.4
4/5 - 1/3 = ? - ANS7/15
5/8 + 6/8 = ? - ANS11/8
1
, 2
57% = ? - ANS.57
6.021 * .4 = ? - ANS2.4084
60 minutes = __ hour - ANS1 hour
60 seconds = __ minute(s) - ANS1 minute
A passenger purchased a vase from an art dealer for $1,210. She later
learned that the dealer sold her the vase for 110% of its actual value. What
was the actual value of the vase? - ANS1,100
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting
greater reliance on electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows,
there are increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of
privacy and public access rights. In some investigations, access to all e-
mail, including those messages stored in archival files and messages
outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In
spite of this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never
be said face-to-face or written formally.
What cannot be a Validly Conclusion?
A) Some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of
investigations have contained messages that would never be said face-to-
face
2
, 3
B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-
mail messages
C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations
D) E-mail messages have not been exempted f - ANSA
A trucking company can act as a common carrier-for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo
damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent. If the
company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable for
cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a trucking company hired by
a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage
as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under
contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its cargo
was also damaged.
What is a Validly Conclusion?
A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent
B) If Claus Inc. cannot show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
D) If Nichols Inc. is liable, then it cannot show that it - ANSC
3
