100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Zusammenfassung

Summary Bio ethics: Moral Theories

Bewertung
-
Verkauft
-
seiten
11
Hochgeladen auf
03-06-2024
geschrieben in
2023/2024

Duidelijke samenvatting van de opgeloste examenvragen over het hoofdstuk "Moral Theories". Verschillende standpunten uitgelegd.

Hochschule
Kurs

Inhaltsvorschau

BIO ETHICS : CHAPTER II : MORAL
THEORIES
AIMS




DEFINITIONS

THEORY OF JUSTICE

- Theory of justice: seeks to define what constitutes a just and fair society, as well as the
principles that should govern individual & societal behavior to achieve this ideal.
- Theory of justice = a moral theory that relates to what is a ‘just society’. It is based on the
notion of the social contract (Hobbes). The term ‘justice’ has many interpretations:
o Can be seen as something that one deserves
o Can be seen as what one has a right to
- It no longer focuses on individual acts
- John Rawls: described a theory of justice with the original position behind the veil of
ignorance resulting in a society with equal opportunities and liberties for all = example of an
ideal theory based on idealized assumptions of people’s behavior and the organization &
functioning of a society in order to describe an ideal societal structure.
o Veil of ignorance  people will be unaware of their own characteristics (social
status, wealth, gender,…)  ensures that individuals deliberate impartially and
without bias, as they do not know how they will personally benefit or suffer from
the principles they choose!

Rawls: prioritizes fairness & equality while recognizing that some inequalities may be needed to
promote the well-being of society’s least advantaged members.

EXPERIENCE MACHINE

- The ‘experience machine’ = a thought experiment created by Nozick as critique to the
hedonistic calculus of Bentham in utilitarianism. (he critiques hedonism)
- Imagine that there is a machine that gives you pleasurable experiences
o Hedonistic approach: the experience of pleasure = equivalent to the proper acts that
give you pleasure (so doing is better than only experiencing)
o Intuitively, however, Nozick states that people would prefer to actually do the things
that give pleasure, rather than experience pleasurable illusions  that is why
hedonism is based on a wrong assumption

, HEDONISM

- Hedonism takes only pleasure into account
o It places pleasure and happiness as the highest good or the ultimate goal of life
- It states that what is morally good, is what brings people pleasure & what causes pain is
immoral.
o Pleasure (or happiness) is the only intrinsic good
o Pain (or unhappiness) is the only intrinsic evil
- Hedonism is the first idea of utilitarianism according to Jeremy Bentham
- Pleasure (or pain) can be measured in terms of intensity, length, certainly, and whether they
are followed by opposite emotions
 Hedonism is concerned w/ maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain/suffering

PREFERENCE UTILITARIANISM

- Preference utilitarianism = a 20th century approach to tackle problems related to hedonism.
o So it tried to solve problems with the hedonistic interpretation of the utility principle
by stating that the good has to be defined based on the satisfaction of preferences,
rather than providing pleasure
- It states that something is good if it satisfies the personal preferences rather than providing
pleasure

ACT UTILITARIANISM

- Act utilitarianism demands that each act should be treated separately, since there is no
universal rule on moral goods.

SUPEREROGATORY

- Supererogatory = means that something is beyond doubt good, but at the same time, we feel
that it asks too much of us.
- It is described in a thought experiment of Singer, who states that we should spent less
money on shoes, to be able to donate (more) for a good cause. However, for some people
this may seem supererogatory. Singer states that if we can prevent something bad, without
sacrificing anything or comparable significance, we ought to do it
- Supererogatory conclusions say something is beyond doubt good, but at the same time we
feel it asks to much of us: it seems to be more than what morality requires of us

SPECIESISM

- Speciesism ~ racism & sexism
- Speciesism means that people attribute different values to creatures, based on being more
or less alike to them
- It makes a moral distinction between humans and non-humans (animals)

Schule, Studium & Fach

Hochschule
Studium
Kurs

Dokument Information

Hochgeladen auf
3. juni 2024
Anzahl der Seiten
11
geschrieben in
2023/2024
Typ
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Themen

6,46 €
Vollständigen Zugriff auf das Dokument erhalten:

100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie
Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung
Sowohl online als auch als PDF
Du bist an nichts gebunden

Lerne den Verkäufer kennen
Seller avatar
s0192734

Ebenfalls erhältlich im paket-deal

Lerne den Verkäufer kennen

Seller avatar
s0192734 Universiteit Antwerpen
Folgen Sie müssen sich einloggen, um Studenten oder Kursen zu folgen.
Verkauft
-
Mitglied seit
1 Jahren
Anzahl der Follower
0
Dokumente
13
Zuletzt verkauft
-

0,0

0 rezensionen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Kürzlich von dir angesehen.

Warum sich Studierende für Stuvia entscheiden

on Mitstudent*innen erstellt, durch Bewertungen verifiziert

Geschrieben von Student*innen, die bestanden haben und bewertet von anderen, die diese Studiendokumente verwendet haben.

Nicht zufrieden? Wähle ein anderes Dokument

Kein Problem! Du kannst direkt ein anderes Dokument wählen, das besser zu dem passt, was du suchst.

Bezahle wie du möchtest, fange sofort an zu lernen

Kein Abonnement, keine Verpflichtungen. Bezahle wie gewohnt per Kreditkarte oder Sofort und lade dein PDF-Dokument sofort herunter.

Student with book image

“Gekauft, heruntergeladen und bestanden. So einfach kann es sein.”

Alisha Student

Häufig gestellte Fragen