100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Prüfung

RELG 2650 Final Test Questions with Correct Answers

Bewertung
-
Verkauft
-
seiten
23
Klasse
A+
Hochgeladen auf
13-04-2024
geschrieben in
2023/2024

RELG 2650 Final Test Questions with Correct Answers Describe Asch's position on the acceptability of abortion and prenatal genetic diagnosis. - Answer-Asch argues that women should have the option of abortion so that they can be equal to man and be able to avoid the situation as well. Outlawing abortion is a violation of women's autonomy (involuntary servitude) We shouldn't abort for gender or disability (unless the disability will result in a very short life span). Conscientious objection: - Answer-the ability to refuse an action or provide a procedure/ "treatment" if a physician believes it to be a morally objectionable decision Describe Dresser's 5 models for addressing conscientious objection & their strengths & weaknesses. - Answer-1. Contract Model 2. Duty to Refer 3. Entering Professionals Agree to Conform 4. Draft Board Approach 5. Professionals Seek Compromise Contract Model - Answer-o At outset, professional discloses any limits of treatments. o If a patient requires a service that is excluded, they can then go elsewhere. o Weakness: does not work when patient needs quick care or no one else can take over and provide the service. Duty to Refer - Answer-o If the professional objects and will not provide a service, they have an obligation to refer or transfer patients to another professional that will provide that service. o Weakness: fails when the contract model fails. o Weakness: some professionals will feel as if they are still committing wrong in facilitating the service Entering Professionals Agree to Conform - Answer-o Conscientious objection is not allowed. o If you enter into a profession, you have to conform to its basic standards. Thus you must perform certain services. o Weakness: "basic standards" are hard to define, and professionals may not feel as if they have truly understood and assented to them. Draft Board Approach - Answer-o Requires objectors to explain and defend their opposition to performing a certain service. o Tries to separate sincere beliefs from those that have other motivations for avoiding a service. o Weakness: damaging to morale of professionals. o Weakness: cannot necessarily detect skilled liars. o Weakness: such a detection process is hard to formulate and may be corrupt. Professionals Seek Compromise - Answer-o Professional should try to find a compromise between their beliefs and the patient's interests. o Depends in large part on the hope that other alternatives will arise that keep both professional and patient happy. o Weakness: sometimes an option is not available. o Weakness: compromise can leave both sides unsatisfied. According to ACOG recommendations, under what conditions are conscientious refusals in reproductive medicine acceptable? - Answer-1. Any refusal that conflicts with a patient's well being should be accommodated ONLY if the primary duty to the patient can still be fulfilled. 2. health care providers must impart scientifically accurate and unbiased information 3. must provide patients with accurate and prior notice of their personal moral commitments - and they should not argue/advocate for their positions 4. refer patients in a timely manner to other providers 5. in an emergency in which referral is not possible or might negatively affect a patient's physical health, providers have obligation to provide medically indicate and requested are regardless of their moral objections 6. in resource poor areas, access to safe and legal reproductive services should be maintained. Explain Paul Lauritzen's feminist critique of reproductive technologies. - Answer-Paul Lauritzen, himself, experienced difficulties with infertility. He and his wife decided to hold off on having children until they had established their careers, never expecting/planning on having these difficulties. Lauritzen felt that he and his wife were mere items within an experiment and feel that NRTs should only be used after extensive soul searching and as a last resort. • He presents 4 arguments about NRTs: i. The Tyranny of Technology ii. Dismemberment of Motherhood iii. The Commodification of Reproduction iv. Reproductive Technologies and Genetic Engineering The Tyranny of Technology - Answer-Two types of coercion: 1. coercive offers • advocates of NRT claim that these techniques were created to help infertile couples, expanding the range of choices open to them. • Feminist argument: choice to participate in NRTs is illusory. Society and culture defines a woman's identity in terms of motherhood. • So developing NRTs is not about increasing choice because they are not available to single women (infertile or not) or lesbian women. 2. coercive threats • the potential for a loss of control over one's reproductive destiny is increased with the development of NRTs. • Ultrasounds, amniocentesis, genetic testing, C-sections all have increased the medical community's control over the process of birth. • If trying to increase choice and decrease infertile women's suffering, then doctors would put more effort in educating all women on causes of infertility. • Also, NRTs would be open to single and lesbian women. • The existence of infertility treatments leads people to view infertility as an individual problem, but in reality, the couple, together, suffers from infertility. Dismemberment of Motherhood - Answer-• NRTs question the meaning of motherhood • The maternal experience might become a discontinuous process • The intimacy of pregnancy, labor, and childbirth is absent, which may lead to a loss of connection between the mother and child. • Alienate women from the process of procreation, which removes an experience important for women's identity and power. • Importance of genetic and social parenthood is at stake • Lauritzen believes that there should be a unity between genetic, gestational, and social parenthood The Commodification of Reproduction - Answer-• NRTs treat human beings as products • Divides person into parts; also divides motherhood. • NRT process does not treat the whole patient, just parts • Like "living laboratories", some women were not fully informed of experimental nature of procedures • Children would be treated as products because women pay for embryos or eggs • Because children would be considered property, then can demand for certain standards or else demand compensation or return the product. • Lauritzen's experience: difficult to maintain intimacy in clinic environment designed to achieve results. • Procreation is separated from sexual intercourse. This would lead to sex being viewed as simply the production of an object.

Mehr anzeigen Weniger lesen
Hochschule
RELG 2650
Kurs
RELG 2650










Ups! Dein Dokument kann gerade nicht geladen werden. Versuch es erneut oder kontaktiere den Support.

Schule, Studium & Fach

Hochschule
RELG 2650
Kurs
RELG 2650

Dokument Information

Hochgeladen auf
13. april 2024
Anzahl der Seiten
23
geschrieben in
2023/2024
Typ
Prüfung
Enthält
Fragen & Antworten

Themen

10,61 €
Vollständigen Zugriff auf das Dokument erhalten:

100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie
Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung
Sowohl online als auch als PDF
Du bist an nichts gebunden


Ebenfalls erhältlich im paket-deal

Lerne den Verkäufer kennen

Seller avatar
Bewertungen des Ansehens basieren auf der Anzahl der Dokumente, die ein Verkäufer gegen eine Gebühr verkauft hat, und den Bewertungen, die er für diese Dokumente erhalten hat. Es gibt drei Stufen: Bronze, Silber und Gold. Je besser das Ansehen eines Verkäufers ist, desto mehr kannst du dich auf die Qualität der Arbeiten verlassen.
statmaster Stanford University
Folgen Sie müssen sich einloggen, um Studenten oder Kursen zu folgen.
Verkauft
29
Mitglied seit
2 Jahren
Anzahl der Follower
14
Dokumente
2359
Zuletzt verkauft
4 Jahren vor
A+ Grades

Welcome All to this page. Here you will find ; ALL DOCUMENTS, PACKAGE DEALS, FLASHCARDS AND 100% REVISED & CORRECT STUDY MATERIALS GUARANTEED A+. NB: ALWAYS WRITE A GOOD REVIEW WHEN YOU BUY MY DOCUMENTS. ALSO, REFER YOUR COLLEGUES TO MY DOCUMENTS. ( Refer 3 and get 1 free document). I AM AVAILABLE TO SERVE YOU AT ANY TIME. WISHING YOU SUCCESS IN YOUR STUDIES. THANK YOU.

4,0

2 rezensionen

5
1
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Kürzlich von dir angesehen.

Warum sich Studierende für Stuvia entscheiden

on Mitstudent*innen erstellt, durch Bewertungen verifiziert

Geschrieben von Student*innen, die bestanden haben und bewertet von anderen, die diese Studiendokumente verwendet haben.

Nicht zufrieden? Wähle ein anderes Dokument

Kein Problem! Du kannst direkt ein anderes Dokument wählen, das besser zu dem passt, was du suchst.

Bezahle wie du möchtest, fange sofort an zu lernen

Kein Abonnement, keine Verpflichtungen. Bezahle wie gewohnt per Kreditkarte oder Sofort und lade dein PDF-Dokument sofort herunter.

Student with book image

“Gekauft, heruntergeladen und bestanden. So einfach kann es sein.”

Alisha Student

Häufig gestellte Fragen