100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung Sowohl online als auch als PDF Du bist an nichts gebunden 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Notizen

HMPYC80 assignment 5 R.R.I (revised) 2022 - research methodology

Bewertung
4,4
(23)
Verkauft
72
seiten
34
Hochgeladen auf
17-08-2022
geschrieben in
2022/2023

Not a memo: In-depth guide and analysis 2022. ARTICLE: Sibanda, S.; Guse, T.; & Chigeza, S. (2021) Psychic wounds of post-traumatic stress disorder camouflaged under the uniform of an SAMDF soldier. Psychology in society (PINS), 62, 87-115. CONTAINS:Definitions, extracts from articles and more. Table format for easy input. Research Review Inventory (R.R.I. revised) analysis of the article according to RRI.

Mehr anzeigen Weniger lesen
Hochschule
Kurs













Ups! Dein Dokument kann gerade nicht geladen werden. Versuch es erneut oder kontaktiere den Support.

Schule, Studium & Fach

Hochschule
Kurs

Dokument Information

Hochgeladen auf
17. august 2022
Datei zuletzt aktualisiert am
30. august 2022
Anzahl der Seiten
34
geschrieben in
2022/2023
Typ
Notizen
Professor(en)
Prof
Enthält
Assignment 5

Themen

Inhaltsvorschau

HMPYC80
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Assignment 5
R.R.I (REVISED) - ARTICLE ANALYSIS 2022




88%




BOOKLET CONTAINS:
1. In depth analysis of the 58 items for the R.R.I revised log.
2. Includes break down of terms, quotes from the article and answers for assignment 5 article.
3. Instructions from the tutorial letters with active links to download review log and article
4. Table format included for easy test input

DISCLAIMER:
This is only a guide and an in-depth analysis to help you understand better. Not a memo. Will get you
88%.




ARTICLE ANALYSED:
Sibanda, S.; Guse, T.; & Chigeza, S.
(2021) Psychic wounds of post-traumatic
stress disorder camouflaged under the
uniform of an SAMDF soldier.
Psychology in society
(PINS), 62, 87-115.

,Tutorial Letter 102/0/2022

Assignment 05:
Review a research article with the Research Review Inventory (R.R.I. revised)

In this assignment, you must apply the Research Review Inventory (THIS INVENTORY HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO
THESE NOTES IN AN EASILY UNDERSTANDABLE MANNER) to review a published article in a peer-reviewed
journal.



DUE DATE: 5 September 2022
Unique number: 722296
Year mark: Contribution to final mark: 10
MCQ completed on the Moodle/MyUnisa platform




Steps to complete assignment 02:
1. Download relevant article (links below)
2. Download the Review Log for the R.R.I revised (link below)
3. Enter in your ratings and your reason for the rating into the Review Log
4. Submit your ratings when assignment 2 opens via the Moodle/ MyUnisa platform. It is MCQ.

Note that you must submit the answers for the 58 ratings online on the Moodle Quiz assessment Multiple-
Choice Question platform (without any comments/justifications/reasons).



Research article:

Sibanda, S.; Guse, T.; & Chigeza, S. (2021) Psychic wounds of post-traumatic stress
disorder camouflaged under the uniform of an SAMDF soldier. Psychology in society
(PINS), 62, 87-115.

ACTIVE LINK TO DONWLOAD ARTICLE:
https://www.pins.org.za/pins/pins62/PINS-62_Article_Sibanda_Guse_Chigeza.pdf




R.R.I Revised Log
Use this link below to access MyUnisa and download a blank log for you to work from.
Document title: “Review Log for the Research Review Inventory MS WORD FILE Unisa HMPYC80”
https://mymodules.dtls.unisa.ac.za/mod/folder/view.php?id=111464


2

, HMPYC80/2022
HOW TO USE THE RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY (revised)
The review inventory consists of a number of items, numbered sequentially from 1 up to 58.

RATING SCALE :
Items should be reviewed and rated on a three-point rating scale from 1 to 3.

The ratings are defined as follows:

1: Absent, incorrect, or completely wrong.

2: Only partially addressed. It does not attain the item requirement or criteria.

3: Sufficiently up to standard in terms of the item criteria.

Every relevant item should be reviewed and rated on this three-point scale (1 to 3).




KEEP A RECORD OF YOUR ANSWERS
Use the R.R.I. (revised): Review Log to document and keep a record of your ratings.



REVIEWER COMMENTS AND THE FEEDBACK REPORT
Each rating is associated with general comments.
For example, suppose a reviewer reviews a particular proposal and gives a rating of “3” for the clarification of
the proposed study. The general comment would be: “The research question is formulated. A research question
is derived from the research issue.”



IMPORTANT NOTES
Remember, where the item criterion is not explicitly addressed then allocate a low rating (1). Good academic
writing is clear and transparent. If a reader needs to guess at whether an issue has been implemented and
addressed or not, then the writing is neither clear nor transparent. Only give a high rating (3) if the item criteria
have been explicitly addressed.


TIPS:
*To complete the log, read the Rating Item
(R.R.I) column, refer back to the article, and
then add in your rate (1,2,3) to your blank
log accordingly.

*When you complete the MCQ online, you
will only have to add in your rating of 1, 2 or
3. No comments/ justifications will be
necessary.


3

,In Depth Analysis of the ASSIGNMENT 5 2022 Article using the
RESEARCH REVIEW INVENTORY

A. THE TITLE
Title of the article:
“Psychic Wounds of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder camouflaged under the uniform of an SANDF
soldier”
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

01. The title contains at least one central psychological construct from the research proposal or study.



What is a psychological construct?
Intelligence, motivation, anxiety, and fear are all examples of constructs. In psychology, a construct is a skill,
attribute, or ability that is based on one or more established theories.



Answer:
Psychic Wounds of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder camouflaged under the uniform of an SANDF soldier

Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

02. The title indicates the research setting or demographic information of the sample population.

Any one of the following is sufficient: where, who, when, under what circumstances, or the phenomenon that is
being investigated.

Answer:
This title indicates:
who = SANDF soldier
phenomenon = Psychic Wounds of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

03. The title points to, or refers to, the research method, design or paradigm.
This may be signalled by a keyword or phrase such as: “lived experiences”, “perceptions”, “attitudes”,
“constructions”, “discourses”, “quasi-experimental”, “critical study”, “psychometric properties”, “correlational
study”, “inferential study”, and so on.


4

, HMPYC80/2022

Research methods refers to the tools that one uses to do research. These can either be qualitative or
quantitative or mixed. This is the strategy used to implement the plan.

Examples of qualitative research methods: phenomenological model, ethnographic model, grounded theory,
case study, historical model, narrative model.

Research design refers to the framework of market research methods and techniques that are chosen by a
researcher. This is the plan to answer your question. Needs to signal in some way if it is qualitative or
quantitative.

A research paradigm is “the set of common beliefs and agreements shared between scientist about how
problems should be understood and addressed.” For example, positivism, post positivism, constructivism, ect.




Answer:
In my personal opinion: they did not include anything to this extent
Therefore it does not meet the criteria
=1
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
B. THE ABSTRACT OR SUMMARY
Abstract of the article:

Abstract
“The authors explored the lived experiences of traumatisation among active Black military personnel from a
psychodynamic (Object Relations) framework. The broad aim of this study was to explore traumatisation
and subsequent long-term undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the presenting behaviour and
overall psychological functioning of Black members in the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).
N=9 members of the SANDF participated in the study. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach
and a phenomenological research design. Data was obtained using individual semi-structured interviews,
with IPA as a method of analysis. The findings indicated that participants lived experience of traumatisation
is a chronic state of psychic, occupational and relational re-traumatisation. Continuous traumatisation that
reactivated past unresolved traumas was characterised by annihilation anxiety, psychic numbing and
repression. Phenomenologically overall functional paralysis was evidenced in chronic psychological
deterioration, which manifests in irreversible damage to character, with cognitive and relational deficits linked
to unresolved long-term traumatisation. These findings highlight a need to incorporate psychotherapeutic
models focused on integrative meaning making of psychic distress for adaptive functioning of SANDF members,
suffering from long-term undiagnosed PTSD syndrome from pre- integration armed forces combat
experiences” (Sibanda, et al., 2021, pp. 87).

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




5

, 04. The abstract indicates the research interest, issue or problem.
(What is the research examining or what does it aim to do?)

From the abstract:
The broad aim of this study was to explore traumatisation and subsequent long-term undiagnosed post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the presenting behaviour and
overall psychological functioning of Black members in the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).
(Sibanda, et al., 2021, pp. 87).

Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3




05. The abstract indicates the setting, demographic or circumstances pertaining to the research interest or
question. Any one of the following is sufficient: where, who, when, under what circumstances, or the
phenomenon that is being investigated.

Answer:
Who: Black members in the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).

Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

06. The abstract contains the specific research question or research statement.

From the abstract:
The broad aim of this study was to explore traumatisation and subsequent long-term undiagnosed post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the presenting behaviour and
overall psychological functioning of Black members in the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).
(Sibanda, et al., 2021, pp. 87).

Answer:
All points are present.
Therefore it meets the criteria.
=3



FEEDBACK EXAMPLE 202/02/2022:




6
7,34 €
Vollständigen Zugriff auf das Dokument erhalten:
Von 72 Studierenden gekauft

100% Zufriedenheitsgarantie
Sofort verfügbar nach Zahlung
Sowohl online als auch als PDF
Du bist an nichts gebunden

Bewertungen von verifizierten Käufern

7 von 23 Bewertungen werden angezeigt
2 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

How can I improve this document?

3 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

3 Jahr vor

4,3

23 rezensionen

5
11
4
9
3
3
2
0
1
0
Zuverlässige Bewertungen auf Stuvia

Alle Bewertungen werden von echten Stuvia-Benutzern nach verifizierten Käufen abgegeben.

Lerne den Verkäufer kennen

Seller avatar
Bewertungen des Ansehens basieren auf der Anzahl der Dokumente, die ein Verkäufer gegen eine Gebühr verkauft hat, und den Bewertungen, die er für diese Dokumente erhalten hat. Es gibt drei Stufen: Bronze, Silber und Gold. Je besser das Ansehen eines Verkäufers ist, desto mehr kannst du dich auf die Qualität der Arbeiten verlassen.
PerfectionistNotes University of South Africa (Unisa)
Folgen Sie müssen sich einloggen, um Studenten oder Kursen zu folgen.
Verkauft
4715
Mitglied seit
3 Jahren
Anzahl der Follower
1049
Dokumente
175
Zuletzt verkauft
1 Jahren vor
Perfectionist Notes - private psych hons assistance

Specialising in assistance for Counselling Psychology Honours students. I have worked hard to create reliable content for the students as well as personalized assistance.

4,4

679 rezensionen

5
424
4
143
3
67
2
25
1
20

Kürzlich von dir angesehen.

Warum sich Studierende für Stuvia entscheiden

on Mitstudent*innen erstellt, durch Bewertungen verifiziert

Geschrieben von Student*innen, die bestanden haben und bewertet von anderen, die diese Studiendokumente verwendet haben.

Nicht zufrieden? Wähle ein anderes Dokument

Kein Problem! Du kannst direkt ein anderes Dokument wählen, das besser zu dem passt, was du suchst.

Bezahle wie du möchtest, fange sofort an zu lernen

Kein Abonnement, keine Verpflichtungen. Bezahle wie gewohnt per Kreditkarte oder Sofort und lade dein PDF-Dokument sofort herunter.

Student with book image

“Gekauft, heruntergeladen und bestanden. So einfach kann es sein.”

Alisha Student

Häufig gestellte Fragen