Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Online lezen of als PDF Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NURS 3215 Chapter 9: Quantitative Research Design – Questions With Valid Solutions

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
20-12-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

NURS 3215 Chapter 9: Quantitative Research Design – Questions With Valid Solutions

Instelling
NURS 3215
Vak
NURS 3215

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

NURS 3215 Chapter 9: Quantitative Research Design –
Questions With Valid Solutions

Save




Students also studied


Sherpath: Diabetes Mellitus Chapter 21 Test Case Study 4 (Short

30 terms 24 terms 22 terms




jesssbee Preview kenanderson2017 Preview Brittany182


 




Terms in this set (81)



What 2 questions should be be addressed -Will there be an intervention implemented?
while determining interventions in the -What specific design will be used?: experimental (RCT), quasi
design of a quantitative study? experimental, nonexperimental (observational)


What question should be be addressed -What type of comparisons will be made to illuminate key
while determining comparisons in the relationships and provide a context for interpreting results?:
design of a quantitative study? can be within subject or between subject


What is a within subjects design? Same people are compared at different times (preop or
postop) or under different conditions


What is a between subjects design? Different people are compared (ex. men and women) at the
same time or under the same conditions


What 2 questions should be be addressed -How will confounding variables be controlled?
while determining control over confounding -Which specific confounding variables will be controlled?
variables in the design of a quantitative
study?


List 5 methods to control confounding Randomization, crossover, homogeneity, matching, statistical
variables. control


What 2 questions should be be addressed -Will blinding be used?
while determining blinding techniques in the -From whom will critical information be withheld to avert bias?
design of a quantitative study? : participants, family members, interventionists, other staff,
data collectors


What 2 questions should be be addressed -How often will data be collected?
while determining time frames in the design -When, relative to other events, will data be collected?
of a quantitative study?


What two design options are available to -Cross sectional: data is collected from participants at a
use while determining time frames? certain point in time
-Longitudinal: multiple points of data collection


What question should be be addressed -When will effects be measured, relative to potential causes? :
while determining relative timing in the When will information on independent and dependent
design of a quantitative study? variables be collected? Looking backward (retrospective) or
forward (prospective)

, Differentiate between retrospective and -Retrospective: collect information about outcomes then look
prospective relative timing. back for potential causes
-Prospective: Begin with a potential cause and then see what
outcomes ensue


What question should be be addressed -Where will the study take place? : single vs multisite
while determining location in the design of a
quantitative study?


What do most quantitative research Causal relationships
questions seek to find?


Are most causes deterministic? Give an -No, most causes only increase the likelihood that an effect
example. will occur.
-Ex. smoking is a cause of lung cancer, but not everyone who
smokes gets lung cancer


What is a counterfactual? -What would happen to people if they were exposed to a
causal influence and were simultaneously not exposed to it.
-An effect represents the difference between what actually
did happen with the exposure and what would have
happened without it
-Cannot be realized


What are the 3 key criteria for making causal -Temporal
inferences? -Relationship
-Confounders


Explain the temporal criteria for making -A cause must precede an effect in time
causal inferences and give an example. -If we test the hypothesis that smoking causes lung cancer, we
need to show that cancer occurred after the smoking
behavior


Explain the relationship criteria for making -There must be a demonstrated association between the
causal inferences and give an example. resumed cause and the effect
-We need to demonstrate an association between smoking
behavior and cancer, that is, that a higher percentage of
smokers than nonsmokers get lung cancer


Explain the confounders criteria for making -The relationship cannot be explained as being caused by a
causal inferences and give an example. third variable or confounder
-Suppose that smokers were especially likely to live in urban
environments. There would then be a possibility that the
relationship between smoking and lung cancer reflects an
underlying causal collection between the environment and
lung cancer


What is biologic plausibility? -Evidence from basic physiologic studies that a causal
pathway is credible
-Important criterion in health research for causality


What kind of design is best for revealing a Experimental designs: RCTs
cause and effect relationship?


What is the hierarchy of designs for a RCT/experimental --> quasi experimental --> cohort --> case
therapy question? control --> descriptive correlational


What is the hierarchy of designs for a Cohort --> case control --> descriptive correlational
prognosis question?

Geschreven voor

Instelling
NURS 3215
Vak
NURS 3215

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
20 december 2025
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

€10,76
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
SharpGrades Bournemouth University (London)
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
627
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
467
Documenten
6559
Laatst verkocht
5 dagen geleden
Smart notes. Better grades.

SharpGrades provides clear, well-structured, and exam-focused study materials designed to help students understand concepts quickly and improve academic performance. All notes are carefully organized, concise, and aligned with course requirements to save time and support effective studying.

4,2

119 beoordelingen

5
68
4
21
3
17
2
7
1
6

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen