100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Introduction to political science (IPOL) mid-term summary

Beoordeling
3,0
(1)
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
34
Geüpload op
08-02-2021
Geschreven in
2019/2020

Summary of lectures and readings for the IPOL mid term exam












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
8 februari 2021
Aantal pagina's
34
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Darshan
Bevat
Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

IPOL Mid-term summary


Lecture 1: Central concepts I: What is politics?

The lecture introduces the course with examples of the most important political developments of the present,
the past and the future. It provides examples of urgent political issues and political controversies that we want
to understand better. Then, more systematically, we discuss the question of what politics is. Various definitions
and components of politics are discussed, as well as some classical and modern thinkers (e.g. Aristotle, Dahl).

Reading:

Chapter 1 : Key concepts

- Government: focused on institutions
- Governance: processes
- Key arguments
- The concept of governance is used increasingly in political writing
- Defining politics is difficult : in general a collective activity affecting an entire group
- Ideology has lost its original meaning as science of ideas but still useful
- Typologies are important to impose order

A: An overview:

- Concept: a term, idea or category
- Conception: the way something is understood or interpreted
- In order to understand human behaviour we need to examine many examples
- Comparative politics includes systematic study of institutions, character and performance of
government and political process

B: Government and governance:

- Small groups can make collective decisions more easily
- Decision making groups formed as larger groups cannot make decisions easily
- Government: arena for making and enforcing decisions
- A group of people who govern: the Japanese
- A specific administration: Putin
- Form of system rule: centralized
- Nature and direction of administration of a country: a good government\

C: Politics:

- Negotiation and competition in making and executing shared decisions
- Collective activity
- Making decisions on matters affecting people
- Once reached it becomes authoritative and implemented

,D: Power:

- At the heart of politics is the distribution and manipulation of power
- Power: capacity to bring intended effects
- Luke’s 3 dimensions of power
- Who prevails when preferences conflict? Dahl 1957
- Who controls whether preferences are expressed? Bachrach and Baratz 1962
- Who shapes preferences? Luke 1974
- Authority: the right to rule
- Legitimacy: a government based on authority and those subjects recognise their right to make those
decisions



E: Ideology

- A system of connected beliefs, shared view of the world
- Anarchism: society makes decisions with no need for authoritative control
- Marxism: eliminating state system and private property will lead to a classless non exploitative and self
governing society
- Liberalism: individuals are the best judges of their own interests
- Conservatism: traditional institution, free mark and decentralised government
- Fascism: nationalism, militarism and unity through authoritarian state

F: Comparative politics:

- Systematic study of government and politics in different countries to better understand similarities and
differences
- Broadening our understanding
- Predicting political outcomes

G: Classifying political systems

- Typology: a system of classification which states institutions, process, political cultures etc. are divided
into groups with common attributes
- Aristotle based his scheme on 2 dimensions:
- The number of people governing
- Whether rulers governed for their own interest or common interest

Lecture:

A: Examples

- President of Brazil: Dependency theory/ neo colonialism (Cardosa)
- US secretary of state to Bush (Rice)
- Author for violence and resistance against colonialism (Fanon)
- Prayut : bloodless coup

, - Aung San Suu Kyi: acts as darling of Myanmar

B: Terminology

- Collective action: Paris agreement where everyone must make changes for succession
- The bottom billion: tend to be countries with ongoing conflict
- In terms of life expectancy
- Most refugees stay in the country they came from
- Gentrification: ​the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to
middle-class taste.
- New York
- Definitions of politics:
- Domain: more traditional in the formal institutions of the state
- Aspect: any place where there is a hierarchy or leadership

C: Definitions of politics:

- How we make decisions: (look at Brexit)
- Rules must be made to somehow reflect a community's interests
- Peace of Westphalia - the founding of modern state after 30 year war
- Cooperation or conflict:
- E.g. after each large genocide we say “never again” yet we continue to let this happen
- The environment
- Refugee policy
- How and why people are coerced:
- The state is the actor that controls the use of legitimate violence
- There are limits to violence which states can use
- Who gets what:
- Locke: who are we to determine who gets what god gave us?
- The Greek banking crisis: Germany put together a fund during the deficit
- Money went to foreign lender (who were German)



Lecture 2: Central concepts II- Political science: sub-disciplines and relation to other social sciences

This lecture explains what political science is and how this differs from other ways of thinking, writing and
debating politics (by journalists, politicians themselves, commentators, but also within the humanities, such as
Philosophy and History). We discuss the difference between different types of debates (descriptive,
explanatory/causal and normative) and the comprehensiveness of these debates (eternal paradigmatic
debates versus problem solving mid-level debates). The lecture also addresses the importance of
conceptualization in descriptive and causal reasoning. Finally, attention will be paid to the relationship
between theory/arguments on the one hand and different forms of empirical information / analysis on the
other.

, Reading: Comparing government and politics

Key arguments:

- 3 main methods: case study/qualitative approach to small selection and quantitative to a large
selection
- Comparative research will have different approaches and results depending on whether its empirical or
normative, quantitative or qualitative
- History is underused in comparative political research

A: An overview

- Methodology: systematic analysis of methods used in a given field of enquiry
- To choose appropriate research methods you must consider: unit and level of analysis
- 3 approaches: experimental/ statistical/ comparative

Lecture:

A: General theory examples

- Which things to concentrate on to explain patterns of international relations
- Waltz theory of international politics
- Generalise and carry to a higher order of abstraction
- Rawls theory of justice
- Explain people’s loyalties and significance in political activity
- Whyte Street corner society

B: Political research (what political scientists want to do)

- Frame questions
- Define concepts
- Adding more dimensions to a concept: if no. attributes increases then references decrease
- Specify their theoretical arguments
- Empirically illustrate and test arguments
- Patterns of causation: if x then y
- Constitution not causation: a set of rules that guides how it must work



Lecture 3: Core concepts III- Theories and approaches

Building on the different types of debates and problems of political science in lecture 2, we will now discuss
what theories are and how we can use them. Some examples of theoretical debates are summarized, such as
approaches that emphasize the role of ideas versus the role of institutions versus the role of material positions
and interests. The lecture also explains how theoretical debates can be ‘settled’, among other things at the
level of argumentation (conceptual clarifications and developments) and at the level of empirical findings and
discoveries.

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
3 jaar geleden

3,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
bapolisci Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
178
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
111
Documenten
0
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

4,3

12 beoordelingen

5
6
4
4
3
1
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen