100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

Unit 22 Assignment 3 Rules regulations and officiating in sport

Beoordeling
5,0
(1)
Verkocht
3
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
D
Geüpload op
05-02-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Highest grade achieved

Instelling
Vak








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 februari 2021
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Essay
Docent(en)
Onbekend
Cijfer
D

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Unit 22: Rules, Regulations and Officiating in sport
Assignment 3

Feedback from peers:

After reviewing my own performance, I have received majority positive feedback and as this
was my first time doing linesman, I would think I have done well in certain areas but there is
always room for improvement. For example one positive feedback I received was that I
“showed good understanding of the rules throughout and was decisive with this”. I would say
this was one of my better aspects as I had a good knowledge of the game and rules and
applied it when it was necessary. For example when a player was fouled outside the box, I
flagged to show the referee that it was an unfair challenge which led to them receiving a free
kick. It was a good decision by me because the player could have gotten hurt if the game
proceeded, and giving them the advantage will show I'm fair and applying the rules correctly.
However something I needed to work on was dealing correctly with players not retiring the
correct distance. The feedback I received from this was not too good. I could have also
supported the referee with the flow of the game. To get the game moving quicker and better,
I could have told players where to go, what to do in order to prevent time being wasted.
Decision making was a bit slow but to improve I can work on my intelligence by reading
about the rules and regulations in football. To expand, my peers have said overall I did a
good job and the game was quite fair and treatment was given to both teams. When I
awarded offside during the game it was a good decision because it showed I had control of
the game and I wanted the game to run smoothly and quickly and also finish on time. From
the feedback I received, I would take it on board the next time I'm in this situation and will
learn to apply it in game situations.

Area of strength and improvements:

Throughout the game, I had a few areas of strengths where I acknowledged certain
situations, made correct decisions and allowed the game to flow. Out of the 5 areas I was
assessed on including: Application of the rules/laws, Control of the game, Effective use of
the scoring system, Ensuring health and safety of participants and relationship with others, I
would say I had good moments in each section however every strength comes with room for
improvement. Firstly, for application of the rules, I did quite well with a few errors including I
received a ⅘ for enforcing rules correctly or I applied laws correctly in relation to fair and
unfair physical challenges. This was quite good from me because knowing the laws is one of
the most important rules in football as I would need to know how to handle situations or deal
with them. For example it can be just looking at when the ball goes in and out of the play and
making the correct decision is huge as it can affect any team. This can benefit the control of
the game due to the fact if I made the incorrect decision, the players may become furious
which may lead to incidents and bad behaviour. Since I did this well, the game ended with
fair and reasonable decisions but to improve and receive full marks next time I can practise
officiating more regularly which will lead to continuous and better decisions and improve my
ability as a linemans. The comment I received for this section was that I showed a good
understanding of the rules throughout and I could have supported the referee with dissent
and flow of the game to improve. I understand this comment because often dissent took
€7,07
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
1 jaar geleden

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
saiful090503 PEARSON
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
55
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
41
Documenten
28
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

3,7

16 beoordelingen

5
4
4
5
3
6
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen