CIPP/E – RELEVANT CASES
STUDY SET
The Commission's case against the United Kingdom?
The Commission declared on September 30, 2010, that it had referred the UK to
the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for failing to fully implement EU
regulations pertaining to the confidentiality of electronic communications.
CJEU: What was decided in the 2014 Google Spain (AEPD) case?
Search engines (SE) are in charge of the personal information found on third-
party websites; if they are based outside of the EU and engage in core
operations that include EU establishment, such as advertising space promotion,
they are liable under the GDPR.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that search engines must exclude
results that include information on a person, links to websites run by third
parties, and results that appear after a search on that person's name when people
object and specific conditions are met.
ECJ: What was decided in the 2014 Digital Rights Ireland case?
In light of Articles 7, 8, and 11 of the Charter, the ECJ investigated the validity
of the Data Retention Directive.14 When analyzing the particular elements that
resulted in the Commission's Safe Harbor decision being declared illegal, the
European Court of Justice (ECJ) established reasons that were later used to
determine the invalidity of the Data Retention Directive.
ECJ: What was the ruling in the 2015 ANAF case (Bara v. Casa)?
According to an ECJ ruling, personal information cannot be shared between a
member state's public administrative entities without the persons' knowledge.
STUDY SET
The Commission's case against the United Kingdom?
The Commission declared on September 30, 2010, that it had referred the UK to
the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for failing to fully implement EU
regulations pertaining to the confidentiality of electronic communications.
CJEU: What was decided in the 2014 Google Spain (AEPD) case?
Search engines (SE) are in charge of the personal information found on third-
party websites; if they are based outside of the EU and engage in core
operations that include EU establishment, such as advertising space promotion,
they are liable under the GDPR.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that search engines must exclude
results that include information on a person, links to websites run by third
parties, and results that appear after a search on that person's name when people
object and specific conditions are met.
ECJ: What was decided in the 2014 Digital Rights Ireland case?
In light of Articles 7, 8, and 11 of the Charter, the ECJ investigated the validity
of the Data Retention Directive.14 When analyzing the particular elements that
resulted in the Commission's Safe Harbor decision being declared illegal, the
European Court of Justice (ECJ) established reasons that were later used to
determine the invalidity of the Data Retention Directive.
ECJ: What was the ruling in the 2015 ANAF case (Bara v. Casa)?
According to an ECJ ruling, personal information cannot be shared between a
member state's public administrative entities without the persons' knowledge.
