Tort Law Case Study Assignment
Assignment Instructions:
Answer the following discussion questions for each of the two cases. Use complete
sentences and provide detailed responses. Provide references in APA style at the end of
the document.
Case #1: Coomer v. Kansas City Royals
1. What is the legal issue? (pose in the form of a question)
2. Does the plaintiff (Coomer) achieve all four elements of a tort law case?
3. What precedent is set in this case?
4. As a sport employee/worker, what issues/benefits does this case create?
Case #2: Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals
1. What is the legal issue? (pose in the form of a question)
2. Does the plaintiff (Hackbart) achieve all four elements of a tort law case?
3. What precedent is set in this case?
4. As a sport employee/worker, what issues/benefits does this case create?
Assignment Instructions:
Answer the following discussion questions for each of the two cases. Use complete
sentences and provide detailed responses. Provide references in APA style at the end of
the document.
Case #1: Coomer v. Kansas City Royals
1. What is the legal issue? (pose in the form of a question)
2. Does the plaintiff (Coomer) achieve all four elements of a tort law case?
3. What precedent is set in this case?
4. As a sport employee/worker, what issues/benefits does this case create?
Case #2: Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals
1. What is the legal issue? (pose in the form of a question)
2. Does the plaintiff (Hackbart) achieve all four elements of a tort law case?
3. What precedent is set in this case?
4. As a sport employee/worker, what issues/benefits does this case create?
