100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Allocation of Scarce Critical Care Resources Assignment Instr

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Geüpload op
14-09-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Allocation of Scarce Critical Care Resources Assignment Instructions: Identify a complex healthcare ethical dilemma facing the professional nurse in a multi-dimensional healthcare environment. Conduct an in-depth exploration of the literature about the selected dilemma and identify relevant stakeholders to explore their perspectives. This report addresses the allocation of scarce critical care resources (e.g., ICU beds and ventilators) during a public health emergency. The document includes a literature-informed analysis, identification of stakeholders, stakeholder perspectives, ethical frameworks, and recommendations for nursing practice. Introduction The allocation of scarce critical care resourcessuch as ICU beds and mechanical ventilatorsduring a public health emergency poses a complex ethical dilemma for professional nurses. Nurses are at the beds

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 september 2025
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Allocation of Scarce Critical Care
Resources




Assignment Instructions:


Identify a complex healthcare ethical dilemma facing the professional nurse in a multi-
dimensional healthcare environment. Conduct an in-depth exploration of the literature
about the selected dilemma and identify relevant stakeholders to explore their
perspectives.


This report addresses the allocation of scarce critical care resources (e.g., ICU beds and
ventilators) during a public health emergency. The document includes a literature-
informed analysis, identification of stakeholders, stakeholder perspectives, ethical
frameworks, and recommendations for nursing practice.

, Introduction
The allocation of scarce critical care resources—such as ICU beds and mechanical
ventilators—during a public health emergency poses a complex ethical dilemma for
professional nurses. Nurses are at the bedside, advocating for individual patients while
also participating in system-level triage processes that aim to maximize benefit across
populations. This paper examines the ethical, clinical, legal, and organizational
dimensions of resource allocation, reviews key literature and guidelines, identifies
stakeholders, and explores stakeholder perspectives to inform nursing practice.


Problem Description and Context
During surges in demand—such as the COVID-19 pandemic—healthcare systems may
face shortages of ICU beds, ventilators, and trained staff. Triage decisions determine
which patients receive life-sustaining treatments and which do not. These decisions raise
difficult questions about how to balance competing ethical principles, including
beneficence (doing good), nonmaleficence (avoiding harm), justice (fair distribution), and
respect for autonomy. Professional nurses often experience moral distress when asked to
implement triage protocols that deny or withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients
who would otherwise receive it.


Literature Review
A growing body of literature addresses ethical allocation during crises. Emanuel et al.
(2020) proposed ethical principles for allocating scarce medical resources during
COVID-19, emphasizing maximizing benefits (saving the most lives and life-years),
treating people equally, promoting and rewarding instrumental value, and giving priority
to the worst off when appropriate. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and
other professional societies published triage frameworks emphasizing objective clinical
criteria, transparency, and procedural fairness (SCCM, 2020).

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
newage Uop
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
22
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
15
Documenten
4723
Laatst verkocht
6 maanden geleden
A+ Self prepared Study guides for my peers

Truly helpful study guides

4,2

6 beoordelingen

5
3
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen