100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Tutorial 6- national and EU protection of Human Rights Constitutions Compared (5th Edition), ISBN: 9781780688831 Comparative Government (PUB1002/2020-200)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
25
Geüpload op
05-12-2020
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Tutorial 6: Human Rights











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
5 december 2020
Aantal pagina's
25
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

National and EU protection of Human Rights
Overview............................................................................................................................3
Judicial review....................................................................................................................3
Constitutional review of legislation....................................................................................3
Other types of judicial review.............................................................................................3
Constitutional Review of Legislation...................................................................................3
Arguments to justify the right for judges to review the constitutionality of legislation.......3
Arguments against the right for judges to review the constitutionality of legislation..........3
The Procedural Setting of Constitutional Review.................................................................5
Concrete review..................................................................................................................5
Abstract review..................................................................................................................5
Ex ante review....................................................................................................................5
Ex post review....................................................................................................................5
Decentralized system of review..........................................................................................5
Centralized system of review..............................................................................................5
US......................................................................................................................................5
Germany............................................................................................................................5
France................................................................................................................................5
United Kingdom.................................................................................................................5
The Netherlands.................................................................................................................6
Consequences.....................................................................................................................6
What exactly is the consequence of a judicial decision stating that a statute is
unconstitutional?...............................................................................................................6
Disapplication/ Invalidation/..............................................................................................6
Setting aside.......................................................................................................................6
Annulment/ declaring void.................................................................................................6
(further-reaching consequences)........................................................................................6
Germany............................................................................................................................6
US......................................................................................................................................6
Proceedings before the Court of Justice of the EU...............................................................6
Conclusion:.........................................................................................................................7
Review of Treaty Law Compliance......................................................................................7
Judges would test legislation for their compatibility with a higher norm............................7

,(Is the treaty law really a higher norm?).............................................................................7
Monism..............................................................................................................................7
Dualism..............................................................................................................................7
European Union Law..........................................................................................................9
Preliminary question........................................................................................................10
National courts.................................................................................................................10
The Court System..............................................................................................................11
UK....................................................................................................................................11
Constitutional review........................................................................................................11
International Treaties and the ECHR.................................................................................12
France..............................................................................................................................14
Constitutional review........................................................................................................14
International treaties and the ECHR..................................................................................15
Netherlands......................................................................................................................16
Constitutional review........................................................................................................16
International treaties and the ECHR..................................................................................17
Germany..........................................................................................................................18
Constitutional review........................................................................................................18
International treaties and ECHR........................................................................................20
USA..................................................................................................................................21
Constitutional review........................................................................................................22
International treaties and ECHR........................................................................................22
European Union................................................................................................................23
EU Courts..........................................................................................................................23
The ECJ (and the Court).....................................................................................................23
National Court and EU......................................................................................................23
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.............................................................................24
(EU has developed its own Bill of Rights)..........................................................................24

, Overview
Judicial review  A judge can examine a legal decision or norm, or another
object of scrutiny, and check its compatibility with a higher
norm
 A judge may, depending on the system, test whether a
regional law is in harmony or in conflict with a higher,
national law
If the lower law provides rules that go against the provisions of the
higher law
 the judge, if he has review power, may establish a conflict
Constitutional  Judge may check whether an administrative decision by a
review of legislation public authority complies with the authorizing general
legislation
 depending on the system, examine the validity of a
national statute by setting it against the national
constitution
Example
 hypothetical review of the constitutionality of a criminal
provision that prescribes the death penalty whereas the
constitution bans the death penalty
Other types of  the judge may review the constitutionality of political
judicial review parties
 may review the compatibility of national law with general
principles of law, such as proportionality, or with an
international treaty, such as the European Convention on
Human Rights
 where applicable, check the compliance of treaties or acts
of international organizations with the national
constitution
Judicial review is thus a court’s power to detect conflicts in law,
and possibly to attach consequences to resolve the conflict
Constitutional Review of Legislation
Arguments to justify the right for judges to Arguments against the right for judges
review the constitutionality of legislation to review the constitutionality of
legislation
1. Judicial review guarantees the The constitution can very well be
supremacy of Constitution supreme, without frustrating the will of
 the constitution is the highest norm in a the lawmaker
legal system  The lawmaker should simply
 all other law derives from its authority take account of the
 legislation should not be allowed to constitution when passing
violate the constitution statutes in the first place, and
 judges should refuse to apply normal make the right choices itself,
statutes if they violate the constitution subject as it is to democratic
Having a constitution but no constitutional oversight from the voters
review powers for the courts would be pointless (democratically elected office-
 since the lawmaker could violate the holders vs unelected judges)
€5,49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
Mariajohnson2
5,0
(1)

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Thumbnail
Voordeelbundel
All chapters of comparative government course
-
5 8 2020
€ 43,92 Meer info

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
Mariajohnson2 Maastricht University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
7
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
7
Documenten
36
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen