100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

TPS3704 Assignment 50 Portfolio Semester 2 2025 - Due 19 September 2025

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
71
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
01-09-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

TPS3704 Assignment 50 Portfolio Semester 2 2025 - Due 19 September 2025

Instelling
Vak











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
1 september 2025
Aantal pagina's
71
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

TPS3704
PORTFOLIO 2025
DUE: 29 SEPT 2025 (MEMO)

,TPS3704/103/2025

MENTOR PAGE



MENTOR REPORT REGARDING: (Name of student)



BY TITLE: Mr./Ms./Mrs.

SURNAME: JACOBS

NAME: LAVURN



CONTACT DETAILS (those of the school if that is what you prefer):

Cell phone: 072749835

E-mail: Lavurn@gmail,com



Name: Lavurn

Qualifications: [B.Ed Senior Phase and FET, PGCE

Experience as a teacher: 15 years teaching experience in Senior Phase and FET

Experience as a mentor: 8 student teachers

Training as a mentor

(by whom and how much/ formal/informal, accredited or not):

Departmental mentor training workshop, 3 days - formal

Informal mentoring through school-based support programmes

,Comments



1. Was the general conduct of the student irreproachable (on time, conduct
according to school requirements for teachers)?

Yes, the student displayed professional behaviour at all times. She/he was punctual,
dressed appropriately, and followed the school’s code of conduct. The student showed
respect towards colleagues, learners, and management.



2. Was the student's level of subject knowledge sufficient for the presentation of
lessons?

Yes, the student demonstrated sound subject knowledge. Lesson presentations
reflected correct content and understanding of the curriculum. Where there were gaps,
the student showed willingness to research and clarify concepts.



3. Did the student use your suggestions and recommendations to improve her/his
work?

Yes, the student was open to feedback and implemented suggestions effectively.
Improvement was visible in lesson planning, teaching strategies, and classroom
management.



4. Did the student prepare well when she/he had to present lessons?

Yes, the student came well-prepared with lesson plans, teaching resources, and
activities suited to the learners’ level. Lessons were structured and learner-centred.

, 5. Did the student work regularly/ continuously on her/his portfolio?

Yes, the student worked on the portfolio consistently throughout the teaching practice.
Entries were updated on time, and evidence of reflection and improvement was noted.



Did the student complete her/his portfolio during the Practical Teaching period?

YES



Strong points of the student/ good qualities and good work done:

The student demonstrated strong classroom management skills and was able to
maintain discipline in a positive and respectful way. She/he prepared engaging lessons
using a variety of teaching methods that encouraged learner participation. The student
was committed, punctual, and displayed a professional attitude towards colleagues and
learners. Her/his willingness to accept feedback and implement suggestions was a key
strength.



Aspects on which the student still has to improve to be ready to enter education as a
beginner teacher:

The student still needs to improve time management during lessons to ensure that all
planned activities are completed effectively. More practice is needed in differentiating
tasks to meet the needs of learners at different levels of ability. The student should also
continue developing confidence in integrating technology and multimodal resources into
lessons to enhance learning.



SIGNATURE

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Heartutor Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
737
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
46
Documenten
244
Laatst verkocht
3 weken geleden

3,9

101 beoordelingen

5
57
4
9
3
18
2
5
1
12

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen