100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Qualitative Methods in Media & Communication Week 3 Summary

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
8
Geüpload op
23-11-2020
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Course Literature, Lecture, Self-Test Answers










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
23 november 2020
Aantal pagina's
8
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Term 2, 2020-2021


Qualitative Methods in Media &
Communication (CM2006)

WEEK 3
Qualitative Interviews & Sampling - Dumitrica &
Pridmore
- Introduction
• Interviews allow researchers to engage with people’s meaning-making practices in
a more natural setting.
- When and why should you use qualitative interviews to collect your data?
• It is thus important that you understand when your research question can be
answered by using a survey, a focus group, or an interview.
• List of people’s attitudes, beliefs, preferences, or even simple knowledge —>
surveys may be a better option.
• If your aim is to understand how people’s understanding of a topic is formulated,
offered, and discussed with others, then focus groups may be a better option.
• If your aim is to understand not only what, but primarily how people make sense of
a topic, then interviews are your choice.
• Interviews can be used for other research interests
- Accounts and explanations of behaviour
- Motivations behind certain actions
- Responses to an event or phenomenon
- Interpretations of texts, events, phenomena, etc.
- Life stories
- Views and opinions on an event or phenomenon, etc.
- Types of Interviews
• Factual interviews: aim to collect people’s account of what is going on in a field or
during an event
• Conceptual Interviews: seek to clarify how people understand an abstract concept
such as ‘democracy’ or, if you check the example in the box above, ‘trolling’


1 Laura Sehnem

, Term 2, 2020-2021
• Narrative Interviews: focus on how participants talk about their lives or about
specific events
• Discursive Interviews: interested in how participants select specific symbols and
arguments to explain their own position
- Sampling & Access
• The Sampling Process
- Define sample with the help of sampling criteria
- Decide upon sample size
- Select Sampling Strategy
- Sample Sourcing (recruitment)
• You are advised to also consider whether your sample should be homogeneous or
heterogeneous in some aspects. Robinson (2014) for instance talks of five
dimensions of homogeneity: demography, geographic, physical, psychological, and
life history.

• Qualitative research, on the other hand, opts for purposive sampling. That is the
case because “sampling in qualitative research in most cases is [...] conceived as a
way of setting up a collection of deliberately selected cases, materials or events
for constructing a corpus of empirical examples for studying the phenomenon of
interest in the most instructive way”

• Purposive Sampling Methods
- Extreme samples: include cases that are at the extremes of the topic under
investigation.
- Typical samples: the opposite of the previous one, this sample includes the
average cases in relation to the topic under investigation.
- Maximal variation: focus on achieving as much variety among participants (again,
in relation to the topic) as possible.
- Critical sample: include individuals whose experiences provide most expertise
(e.g. experts in a field).
- Sensitive samples: focus on selecting individuals in precarious positions, although
the ethics of that needs to be carefully considered.
- Convenience samples: include the individuals who are most accessible to the
researcher. It is important to remember that such samples are the least
accepted in social research, and not recommended for student assignments.
- Snowball sample: in this type of sample, the initial participants recommend
other potential participants that meet the sampling criteria.
- Ethical


2 Laura Sehnem

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
lauraasehnem Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
35
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
33
Documenten
41
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

4,3

4 beoordelingen

5
1
4
3
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen