100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Civil Procedure – Final Exam Study Outline (U.S. Federal & State Jurisdiction, Venue, and Procedural Rules) – Comprehensive Exam Preparation Notes

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
27
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
11-08-2025
Geschreven in
2025/2026

This document provides a complete and detailed outline of key Civil Procedure topics, focusing on U.S. federal and state jurisdiction, venue, and related procedural rules. It covers subject-matter jurisdiction (diversity, federal question, supplemental jurisdiction), personal jurisdiction (long-arm statutes, due process, minimum contacts), and venue rules for diversity and non-diversity cases. The notes also address removal and remand, forum non conveniens, service of process requirements, and federal vs. state law application (Erie doctrine). Designed for law students, this material aligns closely with final exam preparation, offering definitions, rule statements, exceptions, and practical examples.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Civil Procedure
Vak
Civil procedure










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Civil procedure
Vak
Civil procedure

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
11 augustus 2025
Aantal pagina's
27
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓Decides "Federal
Forum" v. "State Forum"



- Diversity Citizenship

- Federal Question (you have the option of federal)



Diversity Jurisdiction Requirements ~Correct Answer~✓✓1. Amount in
Controversy: P's Claim more then $75,000. Claim must be made in
"good faith"



2. Complete Diversity: "Across the V", no plaintiff can reside int he
same state as any defendant.



When does Diversity Jurisdiction apply? ~Correct Answer~✓✓When a
plaintiff sues a defendant in federal court, and there is no federal
claims/cause of action. If there is no federal law in the case, the only
way they can be in the federal law is through DIVERSITY. (Amount in
Controversy/Complete Diversity)



Federal Question Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓If there is any FQJ
it can be heard in federal court, but it still doesn't have to be. Even if

,there is diversity it can still be heard in state court, FQJ just gives you
the option to go to federal.



Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule ~Correct Answer~✓✓In determining
whether there is federal question, we look at the plaintiffs complaint,
nothing else. Even if plaintiff has federal defense or counter claim, what
determines FQJ is determined by the plaintiffs cause of action.



- Cause of action CANNOT be a state law action w/ anticipation of a
defense of a federal action/law.



-DOESNT matter if there is a "federal ingredient", if cause of action is
based on STATE LAW, there is NO FQJ.



Holmes "Creation" Test (determining FQJ) ~Correct
Answer~✓✓Similar to/Goes hand and hand with WPCR. When looking
at plaintiffs complain, what law provides plaintiff with a remedy? State
law or Federal law? If YES, FQJ exists



Private Right of Action ~Correct Answer~✓✓When congress says you
have a right to enforce a particular statute.



Supplemental Jurisdiction ~Correct Answer~✓✓Can ONLY be applied
to:

, 1) Original Jurisdiction, AND

2) Federal Question Jurisdiction



Supplemental Jurisdiction on "Pendent Parties" in a diversity claim?
~Correct Answer~✓✓NO!



EXCEPTION: Multiple P's suing 1 D, only 1 Plaintiff per defendant has
to satisfy the amount in controversy, pending there is CNOF.
COMPLETE DIVERSITY also required when talking about claims filed
by the Plaintiff.



Pendent claims/parties ~Correct Answer~✓✓Additional parties sued by
PLAINTIFF in her complaint.

• 1 federal claim/others are state law claims

• Doesn't work in diversity cases, only federal

• MUST satisfy common nucleus of facts



Ancillary claims/parties ~Correct Answer~✓✓Additional parties sued
by defendant, after plaintiff files her complaint usually by:

• counterclaim (suing back),

• cross-claim (suing other defendant), OR

• third party complaint (if I'm liable to you its because X did this wrong
too)

• MUST satisfy common nucleus of facts (if you want it to be covered
under supplemental jurisdiction

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
PUREGRADES University Of Washington
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
94
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
5
Documenten
1140
Laatst verkocht
4 dagen geleden
PUREGRADES

I am an experienced academic writer , with ability to do high quality assignments, essays, research papers, and discussion. Whether you\'re looking for detailed answers to complex questions or need a comprehensive and well structured paper, I am here to assist, hence ensuring tailored and reliable solutions for your academic needs. Let’s achieve your academic goals together.

4,4

17 beoordelingen

5
11
4
2
3
4
2
0
1
0

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen