100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Task 4 Psychodiagnostics

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
14
Geüpload op
05-11-2020
Geschreven in
2019/2020

Uitwerking Task 4 Psychodiagnostics










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 november 2020
Aantal pagina's
14
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Task 4

Bron: Osmosis - Diagnostic Errors
System 1
- Fast
- Snap decision
- Needs to be self-monitored to avoid mistakes in diagnosing
→ pattern in a clinical presentation

System 2
- Slow
- Analytical
- Conscious effort
- Helps to avoid mistakes made by system 1
→ better analysis of person’s symptoms

Cognitive mistakes → diagnostic errors
● Premature closure
○ Initial diagnosis is heavily focused on
○ Mind becomes closed to other possibilities
● Representative bias
○ Looking for classic presentation of disease
○ Patient presents with atypical/variant pattern
○ Experienced clinicians know variants of common diagnosis are frequent

System 1
● More accurate as clinicians move through careers
● Recognize atypical/variant presentations

Bron: Bornstein
3 components of EBPP (Evidence-Based Practice in Psychology)
1. Research (Testing & Assessment)
2. Clinical expertise
3. Patient characteristics

Best available research
● Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
○ Provides only minimal guidance in this area
○ Discusses issues related to test development, administration, and interpretation,
and strategies for validating test scores and establishing their reliability
○ Says little about procedures and strategies for psychological assessment
● International Test Commission Guidelines on Test Use
○ Greater attention to issues regarding psychological assessment as well as
psychological testing

, ○ Also does not discuss procedures for
■ Integrating psychological test data
■ Operationalizing assessment effectiveness and documenting clinical
utility
■ Interpreting test score discontinuities
■ Implementing debiasing strategies to reduce examiner expectancy effects
■ Providing test feedback in a way that facilitates patient engagement in the
treatment process
○ Also does not
■ Discuss the psycholical processes that underlie patients’ responses to
different types of test items and tasks
■ Consider the interpersonal dynamics of the assessment process
■ Discuss how competence and proficiency in psychological assessment
could be operationalized and evaluated
→ these issues are very important!!
● Testing
○ Extension of Messick’s integrative approach → Bornstein
■ Traditional outcome-focused validity assessment must be complemented
by process-focused validity assessment
● Assessment of the degree to which a given instrument engages in
the respondent his psychological processes that the test is
expected to engage, given the construct being measured and the
format of items and tasks that comprise that the test question
○ E.g. person with memory difficulties
■ Category: self-report
○ Psychological processes in testing
1. Engaging in introspection: turning their attention inward to determine if
the statement captures some aspect of their feelings, thoughts, motives,
or behaviors
2. Occurring of retrospective memory search: attempt to retrieve
instances wherein they experienced or exhibited the response(s)
described in the test item
3. Engaging in deliberate self-presentation: decideing whether, given the
context and setting in which they are being evaluated, it is better to
answer honestly or modify their response to depict themselves in a
particular way
● Table 1: classified assessment tools, grouped based on mental activities and behaviors
involved in responding to the tests

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
renskeum Maastricht University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
239
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
179
Documenten
2
Laatst verkocht
3 weken geleden

3,5

21 beoordelingen

5
4
4
4
3
12
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen