CIC2601 Assignment 3 (QUALITY ANSWERS) 2025

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the CIC2601 Assignment 3 (QUALITY ANSWERS) 2025. For assistance whats-app us on 0.6.8..8.1.2..0.9.3.4.....Question Question 1 [20 marks] The aim of this question is to allow you to demonstrate how digital technologies can be used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Task: How can you ensure that the use of digital technologies in the classroom supports the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills in learners? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Integration of Digital Technologies Clearly describes how digital technologies are used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Describes the use of digital technologies with minor details missing. Mentions the use of digital technologies but lacks clarity on fostering cognitive skills. Vague mention of digital technologies with little relevance to cognitive skills. No mention of digital technologies or irrelevant use. Development of Critical Thinking Provides a detailed explanation of how digital technologies support critical thinking. Explains support for critical thinking with some details missing. Basic explanation of support for critical thinking. Vague explanation of support for critical thinking. No explanation of support for critical thinking. Development of Problem-Solving Skills Thoroughly explains how digital technologies enhance problem-solving skills. Explains enhancement of problem-solving skills with some details missing. Basic explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Vague explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. No explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 2 [20 marks] In this question, we encourage you to critically evaluate digital technology tools and their relevance in teaching. Task: Select a digital tool that you have learned about in this module. Evaluate its effectiveness in the classroom, considering its strengths and limitations. How would you recommend improving it for educational use? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Evaluation of Digital Tool Clearly evaluates the digital tool, considering its strengths and limitations. Evaluates the digital tool with some details missing. Basic evaluation of the digital tool. Vague evaluation of the digital tool. No evaluation of the digital tool. Strengths and Limitations Provides detailed and relevant strengths and limitations of the digital tool. Provides strengths and limitations with some details missing. Basic strengths and limitations provided. Vague strengths and limitations. No strengths and limitations provided. Recommendations for Improvement Thoroughly explains recommendations for improving the digital tool for educational use. Explains recommendations with some details missing. Basic recommendations provided. Vague recommendations. No recommendations provided. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 3 [10 marks] This question promotes critical thinking about potential barriers and solutions, whether they are technological, pedagogical, or institutional. Task: What are the key challenges you foresee in integrating digital technologies into classroom instruction, and how might you address them? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Identification of Challenges Clearly identifies key challenges in integrating digital technologies. Identifies challenges with some details missing. Basic identification of challenges. Vague identification of challenges. No identification of challenges. Solutions to Challenges Provides detailed and practical solutions to address the challenges. Provides solutions with some details missing. Basic solutions provided. Vague solutions. No solutions provided. CIC2601-25-Y