100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

RSE4801 Assignment 3 (DETAILED ANSWERS) 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Beoordeling
4,0
(3)
Verkocht
14
Pagina's
20
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
10-07-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

RSE4801 Assignment 3 (DETAILED ANSWERS) 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references , Well-structured RSE4801 Assignment 3 (ANSWERS) 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED. (DETAILED ANSWERS - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)... In 3000–3500 words, critically compare the ontological and epistemological foundations of positivism and interpretivism. Discuss how each shapes research design in educational studies and argue which is more suitable for understanding inclusive education. Compare the ontological and epistemological assumptions of critical theory, postmodernism, and decoloniality. Which of these paradigms offers the most effective framework for challenging inequality in education? Examine how positivist and critical realist paradigms approach knowledge and reality. Evaluate the practical implications of both for conducting research on teacher performance in under-resourced schools. Discuss the differences and similarities between interpretivism, critical theory, and postmodernism in terms of their epistemological stances. Which paradigm best supports learner-centred education reform and why? Compare and contrast the ontological views of postmodernism and critical realism. How do these influence research design and data interpretation in studies on learner diversity? Analyse the role of ontology and epistemology in shaping research paradigms. Using examples from decoloniality and critical theory, explain how these paradigms contribute to education transformation in South Africa. Critically evaluate the claim that positivism is unsuitable for social research in education. Compare its ontological and epistemological stance with interpretivism to support your argument. Discuss how different paradigms (positivism, interpretivism, critical theory) approach the concept of educational inequality. Which offers the most appropriate lens for studying social justice in schools? Examine the ontological assumptions of critical realism and interpretivism. How do these paradigms influence the way researchers understand knowledge production in multilingual classrooms? Compare the epistemological assumptions of positivism, postmodernism, and decoloniality. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each in educational research? In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality Using the example of curriculum development, compare the ontological positions of positivist and decolonial research paradigms. Which paradigm offers more flexibility for inclusive knowledge production? In 3000–3500 words, discuss the ontological and epistemological implications of using mixed methods in education research. Use critical realism and pragmatism as examples. Compare the epistemologies of positivism and decoloniality in relation to power, knowledge, and truth. Which is better suited to dismantling colonial knowledge structures in education? In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality How do critical theory and postmodernism differ in their understanding of knowledge, truth, and justice? Apply your analysis to educational leadership research. Compare and contrast the ontological assumptions of interpretivism and critical theory. Which paradigm is better suited for exploring learner agency in the classroom? Discuss how postmodernism and decoloniality challenge traditional Western epistemologies in education. Use examples to explain how each paradigm promotes alternative knowledge systems. Critically evaluate how different paradigms address the researcher’s role in educational research. Compare positivism, interpretivism, and critical theory in your response. Examine how ontological and epistemological assumptions affect research questions and data collection strategies. Use examples from postmodernism and decoloniality. Compare the contributions of positivist and interpretivist paradigms to early childhood education research. Which paradigm better captures learner experiences and why? In 3000–3500 words, explore how critical theory and decoloniality offer emancipatory approaches to educational research. Compare their assumptions about knowledge, power, and transformation. In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality In 3000 – 3500 words, compare and contrast the ontological and epistemological assumptions that inform and shape the research paradigms listed below. Thereafter, explain which, amongst them, makes the strongest contribution to education and why Positivism Interpretivism Critical theory Postmodernism Critical realism Decoloniality Critically compare how positivism and critical theory define the purpose of education research. Discuss the implications for social transformation and policy development. Examine the ontological assumptions of critical theory and decoloniality. How do these shape educational research aimed at addressing historical inequalities? Postmodernism and interpretivism both challenge grand narratives. Compare their approaches to knowledge construction in educational research, using examples from classroom-based studies. Compare and contrast the epistemological assumptions of critical realism and positivism. Which paradigm provides a more realistic foundation for investigating teaching practices in South African schools? Analyse how the paradigms of interpretivism and decoloniality approach learner voice and identity in research. Which offers a richer understanding in multicultural educational settings? Critically examine how research paradigms rooted in realism differ from those rooted in relativism. Use educational examples to support your argument. Explore the ontological and epistemological assumptions of positivism and postmodernism. Which paradigm is more suitable for understanding digital learning environments?

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
10 juli 2025
Aantal pagina's
20
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

RSE4801
Assignment 3 2025
Unique #:

Due Date: 7 August 2025

Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.

+27 81 278 3372

, COMPARING ONTOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS OF
RESEARCH PARADIGMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS


1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 4
2. POSITIVISM ........................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................... 5
2.2 Epistemological Assumptions ........................................................................... 5
2.3 Methodological Implications .............................................................................. 5
2.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................... 6
3. INTERPRETIVISM ................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................... 6
3.2 Epistemological Assumptions ........................................................................... 7
3.3 Methodological Implications .............................................................................. 7
3.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................... 8
4. CRITICAL THEORY ............................................................................................... 8
4.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................... 8
4.2 Epistemological Assumptions ........................................................................... 9
4.3 Methodological Implications .............................................................................. 9
4.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................. 10
5. POSTMODERNISM ............................................................................................. 10
5.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................. 10
5.2 Epistemological Assumptions ......................................................................... 11
5.3 Methodological Implications ............................................................................ 11
5.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................. 12
6: CRITICAL REALISM ............................................................................................ 12
6.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................. 12
6.2 Epistemological Assumptions ......................................................................... 13
6.3 Methodological Implications ............................................................................ 13
6.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................. 13
7. DECOLONIALITY................................................................................................. 14
7.1 Ontological Assumptions................................................................................. 14
7.2 Epistemological Assumptions ......................................................................... 15
7.3 Methodological Implications ............................................................................ 15



Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372

, 7.4 Relevance to Education .................................................................................. 16
8. CONCLUSION AND PARADIGM EVALUATION ................................................. 16
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 17




Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372
€2,60
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 14 studenten

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
4 maanden geleden

4 maanden geleden

4 maanden geleden

4,0

3 beoordelingen

5
1
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
VarsityC AAA School of Advertising
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
28681
Lid sinds
8 jaar
Aantal volgers
13258
Documenten
3117
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

4,1

2819 beoordelingen

5
1490
4
581
3
392
2
117
1
239

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen