100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Samenvatting week 2 blok 4.2 Personality Disorders

Beoordeling
3,0
(1)
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
13
Geüpload op
12-10-2020
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Deze samenvatting bevat alle literatuur die gelezen dient te worden voor week 2 van het vernieuwde blok 4.2 Personality disorders () van de master Klinische Psychologie aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. Tevens zijn aantekeningen van de twee colleges in week 2 toegevoegd. De colleges zijn voornamelijk in het Engels samengevat.

Meer zien Lees minder









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 oktober 2020
Aantal pagina's
13
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

1


Week 2: Personality disorders

Lecture 3: The influence of stigma on individuals with PDs: how to decrease stigma?

Leerdoelen
 To identify and distinguish the different types of stigma, incl:
o Characteristics
o Prevalence rate
o Origin/how these stigmas comes about
o Differences between PDs
o Unique position of adolescents
 To identify good vs. poor anti-stigma interventions
 To identify potential (neg) effects of stigma
 To apply knowledge of stigma in PD to clinical examples

Test yourself
Are you wondering how you are doing in terms of stigma and mental illness? Check out this blog post (Links to
an external site.) and take the test. Go over each of the PDs we have discussed so far. Which biases do you
hold? What characteristics make people extra vulnerable to stigma? Which PDs would you be comfortable
working with in future? Why or why not? How can this lecture help you consider stigma when working with
clients?

True or False:
1. There’s no real difference between the terms “mentally ill” and “has a mental illness.”
2. People with mental illness tend to be dangerous and unpredictable.
3. I would worry about my son or daughter marrying someone with a mental illness.
4. I’ve made fun of people with mental illness in the past
5. I don’t know if I could trust a coworker who has a mental illness.
6. I’m scared of or stay away from people who appear to have a mental illness.
7. People with a mental illness are lazy or weak and just need to “get over it.”
8. Once someone has a mental illness, they will never recover.
9. I would hesitate to hire someone with a history of mental illness.
10. I’ve used terms like “crazy,” “psycho,” “nut job” or “retarded” in reference to someone with a mental
illness

Update on treatment for PDs
 There is an increase is specialized treatments for PD, especially for borderline PD. These treatments lead to
a decrease in symptoms of PD and even in remission of PD. Up to 60% of patients with BPD do not fulfill
the criteria of BPD after treatment.
 However, there is a big problem with stigma and PDs. Stigmatization does not only cause burden for the
patients, but also leads to them not seeking help.

Stigma
 Person has deviating characteristics
 These characteristics are interpreted as negative by many people
 Distinction between WE (our group) and SHE (not part of our group)
 Discrimination and loss of status
 About 40% of the population has a psychiatric disorder during their lifetime. From these people, 60%
experiences stigma. About 60% of the stigmatized group will behave differently as a result of
stigmatization, e.g. social withdrawal.
 Stigma can be divided in three domains:
o Public stigma: individuals in the population think persons with a psychiatric disorder are
threatening, unpredictable and incompetent. As a consequence is better t keep your distance and it
is seen as better to not be in contact with these persons.
o Structural stigma: stigma from institutions, caregivers and professionals in the justice system.
People with psychiatric disorders are seen as pathetic, aggressive, manipulative and a
difficulty/burden.
o Self-stigma: having a diagnosis, influences you because of the associated stigma. This leads to
low self-esteem, feeling incompetent, low compliance in treatment, withdrawal from societal
integrations and label avoidance: rejection of caregivers to forbade stigmatization.

, 2


Stigma of PD
 In the media often only negative messages, e.g. a person murdered someone and this person has antisocial
PD.
 Public stigma: the public reacts with anxiety and frustration, are afraid to be manipulated and feel less
sympathy towards people with a PD in comparison to people with other psychiatric disorders. Symptoms of
PD are not recognized by the general populations, which leads to people seeking help because they do not
know they are having a disease. On the other hand, depression and psychotic symptoms are recognized
by the general population.
o Does this account for all PDs?: no, it depends on the type. For example, there is much more
sympathy for people with OCPD, probably because OCD is more recognized as a mental disorder.
For patients with BPD or ASP this is not the case. Another problem is that a lot of people think
personality can’t be treated or fixed.
 Structural stigma: even in the field of psychiatry PDs (especially BPD) are often seen as behavior instead
of a symptom of a disorder. The biological basis for PDs is thought to be small, which is not true. Twin
studies prove heritability (e.g. BPD 50%). It is often thought by psychiatrist to not diagnose adolescents
with a PD, because it is a severe diagnosis. But the earlier treatment is given, the better the outcomes.
Even caregivers in the field of psychiatry find it difficult to recognize patients with a PD. This is partly due to
people not seeking help for a PD, but for example because of depression. After treatment of depression
does not work or if troubles occur during treatment, then a PD is considered. Another thing is that self-
mutilation or suicidal behavior is often seen as a cry for attention instead of a cry for help. It is also thought
that treatment of PDs is very difficult, takes a long time or is not even possible.
o Bailey & Shriver (1999): relative to other PD or the typical outpatient, patients with BPD were rated
as especially easily to misinterpret or misremember social interaction, to lie manipulatively and
convincingly, and to have entered destructive sexual relationships, possible even at young ages.
These are severe accusations. Measurement: interview psychologist.
o Less funding available for PDs research.
 Self-stigma: the consequences of stigma are huge. They internalize public and structural stigma, which can
lead to shame, depression, difficulties with identity, low self-esteem, about their diagnosis. This leads to
withdrawal from society and social interaction, and not seeking help.
o Catthoor: stigmatization in adolescents is much higher in patients with PD compared to other
psychiatric disorder.
o Juurlink: exploring patients with BPD and their experiences with having work. Facilitators to
improve the work situation: improve emotion regulation and self-reflection by treatment. Implication
of the study was that more cooperation is needed between health care institutions and work
facilitators, and that knowledge about PDs needs to be increased.

How to stop stigma?
 Having more knowledge about PDs, which leads to better understanding of behavior of people with PDs.
 Window of tolerance:
o Someone without a psychiatric diagnoses has generally a low level of stress. If a stressful event
occurs, the amount of stress will increase but it will decline after time.
o In a women with a BPD, the basic level
of stress is higher. The reaction to a
stressful event is increased in
comparison to people without a
psychiatric diagnosis. If stress reaches
a certain level, you are not able
anymore to think clearly anymore. As a
result this can lead to an anger attack,
self-harm, etc.
o Everyone has a border of stress and if
this is crossed, you lose control.
Patients without psychiatric disorder
seldomly cross this line.
 Samen sterk zonder stigma
o Spread knowledge via the media and at schools
o Counselling by experts in experiencing psychiatric disorders
 Generieke module (module GGZ standaard)

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
3 jaar geleden

3,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
DePsychologieStudent Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
151
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
87
Documenten
35
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3,9

38 beoordelingen

5
7
4
24
3
6
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen