100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Davis Advantage for Understanding Medical-Surgical Nursing 7th Edition STUDY GUIDE By Williams & Hopper All 57 Chapters Covered, Verified Latest Edition

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
174
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
05-03-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Davis Advantage for Understanding Medical-Surgical Nursing 7th Edition STUDY GUIDE By Williams & Hopper All 57 Chapters Covered, Verified Latest Edition

Instelling
Understanding Medical Surgical Nursing 7th
Vak
Understanding Medical Surgical Nursing 7th











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Understanding Medical Surgical Nursing 7th
Vak
Understanding Medical Surgical Nursing 7th

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
5 maart 2025
Aantal pagina's
174
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

STUDY GUIDE
Davis Advantage for Understanding
Medical-Surgical Nursing 7th Edition
By Hopper, Williams, All Chapter's 1 - 57




1

,(DavisCAdvantageCforCUnderstandingCMedical-SurgicalCNursing,C7eCLindaCWilliams,CPaulaCHopper)


Answers
CHAPTER 1 C
toCcollectCappropriateCdata,CidentifyCaCpatientCproblem,CandCde
termineCtheCbestCpossibleCplanCofCaction.CClinicalCjudgmentCisCb
CRITICAL THINKING,
C
asedConCgoodCcriticalCthinking.
CLINICAL JUDGMENT, ANDTHE
C C C C
Cue
C
NURSING PROCESS C
Definition:CSignificantCorCrelevantCdata.CNotCallCdataCare
cuesC(relevant),CbutCallCcuesCareCdata.
AUDIOC CASEC STUDY Collaboration
JaneC PracticesC ClinicalC Judgment Definition:CWorkingCtogetherCwithCtheChealthCteamCtoCimpr
oveCpatientCoutcomes.
1. IdentifyCandCanalyzeCcues;CprioritizeChypotheses;CgenerateCsolutio
ns;CtakeCaction;CevaluateCoutcomes;Crepeat. Intervention
2. JaneCwasCexhausted,CfailedCaCtest,CandCwasCpulledCinCtooCmanyC Definition:CTakingCactionCtoCcarryCoutCaCplan.
directions.CSheCwasCalsoCcryingCinCherCcarCandChadCpoorCstudyCha
Evaluation
bitsCandCnotCenoughCsleep.
3. Jane’sCresourcesCincludedCaCgoodCfriend,CsickCtimeCfromCwork,C Definition:CComparingCtheCoutcomesCyouCexpectedCwithCactual
Coutcomes.CDidCtheCplanCwork?CWereCexpectedCoutcomesCm
andCwastedCtimeCbetweenCclassesCthatCsheCcouldCbetterCutilize.
CYourCresourcesCwillCbeCdifferent,CbutCtheyCexist!
et?
4. CriticalCthinking— Vigilance
theCwhy:CJaneCusesCcriticalCthinkingCtoCdetermineCwhyCherCcurre Definition:CTheCactCofCbeingCattentive,Calert,CandCwatchful.
ntCplanCisn’tCworking.CSheCthinksChonestlyCaboutCherCpoorCstud
yChabits,CherCtime- CRITICALC THINKINGC ANDC CLINICALCJUDGMENT
CmanagementCproblems,CandCtheCimpactCthisCisChavingConCherCan

dCherCfamily. CriticalCthinkingCandCclinicalCjudgmentCbothCfollowCaCsimilarCformat.
CBothCfollowCstepsCfromCcollectingCdataCtoCdetermin-
ClinicalCjudgment—
CingCproblemsCandCoutcomes,CdevelopingCandCtakingCactions,CandCev
theCdo:CJaneCusesCherCthinkingCtoCdevelopCandCcarryCoutCaCplanCtha
tCusesCherCresourcesCandCprovidesCmoreCproductiveCstudyCtimeCa aluatingCoutcomes.CHowever,CcriticalCthinkingChelpsCyouCthinkCabou
ndCmoreCqualityCtimeCwithCherCkids. tCtheCproblem:CWhatCisCit?CWhyCisCitChappen-
Cing?CAndCclinicalCjudgmentCleadsCyouCtoCdoCsomethingCtoCmanageCth

VOCABULARY eCproblem.

SampleCsentencesCwillCvaryCforCtheCVocabularyCproblems. CUEC RECOGNITION
NursingC process YouCwillCdoCmanyCthingsCforCeachCindividual,CbutCtheCFIRSTCthingCisClistedC
Definition:CAnCorganizingCframeworkCthatClinksCthinkingCwithCnurs below.
ingCactions.CStepsCincludeCassessment/dataCcollection,CnursingC
diagnosis,Cplanning,Cimplementation,CandCevaluation. 1. SitCtheCpatientCupright.
2. CallC911CwhileCrunningCacrossCtheCstreet.
CriticalCthinking 3. ElevateCtheCfeetCoffCtheCbedCbyCplacingCaCpillowCunderCtheCcalvesCa
Definition:CTheCuseCofCthoseCcognitiveC(knowledge)CskillsCorCstrate ndCallowingCtheCfeetCtoChangCoffCtheCedgeCofCtheCpillow.
giesCthatCincreaseCtheCprobabilityCofCaCdesirableCoutcome.CAlsoCi 4. CheckCbloodCglucoseCandChaveCaCglucoseCsourceCready.
nvolvesCreflection,Cproblem-solving,CandCrelatedCthinkingCskills. 5. TurnCtheCpatientCtoCtheCsideCtoCpreventCaspiration.
ClinicalCjudgment
Definition:CTheCobservedCoutcomeCofCcriticalCthinkingCandCdecisionC
making.CACprocessCthatCusesCnursingCknowledge

,2 ChapterC1 Answers

CRITICALC THINKING
ThisCisCjustConeCpossibleCwayCtoCcompleteCaCcognitiveCmap.



CouldCitCbeClow AmC IC diabetic? FrontalCarea "Sick"C feeling Hard TylenolChelps HungerCmakes
bloodCsugar? itCworse



Patient's WhereCisCit? Quality AggravatingC and
perception alleviatingC factors

FoodC helps
Headache



UsefulC other Severity Timing
data



SometimesC feel MotherCis 7–8C onC 0–10 LastsC1–2Chours BeforeCmeals EarlyCinCthe
sickC toC stomach diabetic scale onceC starts morning



REVIEWC QUESTIONS takingCvitalCsigns;CdataCcollectionCisCtheCfirstCstepCinCtheCnursingC
process.C(2,C3,C4)CareCallCstepsCinCtheCnursingCprocess,CforCwhic
TheCcorrectCanswersCareCinCboldface.
hCtheCregisteredCnurseCisCresponsible;CtheCLPN/LVNCmayCassist
1. (2)CCriticalCthinkingCcanCleadCtoCbetterCoutcomesCforCtheCpatien CtheCregisteredCnurseCwithCthese.CNitroglycerinCshouldCnotCbeCa

t.C(1,C3,C4)CmayCbeCtrueCbutCareCnotCtheCbestCanswer. dministeredCwithoutCfirstCknowingCtheCpatient’sCbloodCpressure
2. (4)CisCcorrect.CTheCnurseCwhoCcanCadmitCtoCnotCknowingCsomet .
hingCisCexhibitingCintellectualChumility.C(1)CshowsCexpertiseCbut 7. (2)CindicatesCthatCtheCpatientCisCconcernedCaboutCfreedomCfromCi
CnotCnecessarilyCintellectualChumility; njuryCandCharm.C(1)CrelatesCtoCbasicCneedsCsuchCasCair,Coxygen,Ca
(2) reportingCanCerrorCshowsCintellectualCintegrity; ndCwater.C(3)CrelatesCtoCfeelingCloved.C(4)CisCrelatedCtoChavingCpo
(3) empathizingCisCpositiveCbutCdoesCisCnotCevidenceCofChu sitiveCself-esteem.
mility. 8. (3,C1,C2,C4)CisCtheCcorrectCorderCaccordingCtoCMaslow.
3. (3,C4,C5,C1,C2)CisCtheCcorrectCorder. 9. (5,C2,C1,C4,C6,C3)CisCtheCcorrectCorder.
4. (1)CisCtheCbestCdefinition.C(2,C3,C4)CdoCnotCdefineCcriticalCthinki 10. (3)CshowsCtheCpatientCisCactuallyCtakingCaction.C(1,C2,C4)CareCall
ngCbutCareCexamplesCofCgoodCthinking. CpositiveCbutCdoCnotCshowCintentCtoCtakeCaction.

5. (4)CisCcorrect.CEvaluationCdeterminesCwhetherCgoalsCareCachieve 11. (4)CisCtheCnurse’sCanalysisCofCtheCsituation.C(1,C2)CareCdata;C(
dCandCinterventionsCeffective.C(2)CisCtheCroleCofCtheCphysician.C(1,C 3)CisCaCrecommendation.
3)CencompassCdataCcollectionCandCimple- 12. (1,C2,C3,C4)CshouldCbeCpresent.CSinceCtheCdataCprovidesConlyC
Cmentation,CwhichCareCearlierCstepsCinCtheCnursingCprocess. hipCreplacementCasCtheCpatient’sCproblem,C(5)CtheCdietitianCisC
6. (1)CisCcorrect.CTheClicensedCpracticalCnurse/licensedCvoca- notCnecessary.
CtionalCnurseC(LPN/LVN)CcanCcollectCdata,CwhichCincludes




1

, Answers
CHAPTER 2 C
EVIDENCE-BASEDC PRACTICE
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE C 1. proof
2. context
AUDIOC CASEC STUDY 3. quality
4. care
MarieC andC Evidence-BasedC Practice 5. randomized
1. ThirdhandCsmokeCisCtheCdangerousCtoxinsCofCsmokeCthatClingerC 6. outcomes
onChair,Cclothing,Cfurniture,CandCotherCsurfacesCinCanCareaCafterC 7. gold
aCcigaretteCisCputCout.CMarieClearnedCthatCexposureCtoCtheseCto 8. nursing
xinsCcanCbeCneurotoxicCtoCchildrenCandCcanCtriggerCasthmaCatta 9. patient’s
cksCinCsensitiveCpeople. 10. information
2. Evidence-
basedCpracticeCisCconsideredCtheCgoldCstandardCofChealthCcare. CLINICALC JUDGMENT
3. StepC1:CAskCtheCburningCquestion.CStepC2:CSearchCandCcollect
CtheCmostCrelevantCandCbestCevidenceCavailable.CStepC3:CThin
1. ByCquestioningCtheCexistingCwayCofCdoingCthingsCtoCensureCt
kCcritically.CAppraiseCtheCevidenceCforCvalidity,CrelevanceCtoC hatCtheCpatientCreceivesCtheCbestCcareCpossible
theCsituation,CandCapplicability. 2. ACthoroughCsearchCofCtheCliterature,CwithCtheCassistanceCofCtheCme
StepC4:CMeasureCtheCoutcomesCbeforeCandCafterCinstitutingCtheCch dicalClibrarian,CinCtheCareaCofCtheirCburningCques-
CtionCregardingCmusicCreducingCpreoperativeCanxiety.
ange.CStepC5:CMakeCitChappen.CStepC6:CEvaluateCtheCpracticeCdecis
ionCorCchange. 3. CumulativeCIndexCtoCNursingCandCAlliedCHealthCLiteratureC(CI
4. CombinationCtherapyCwithCaCnicotineCpatchCandCnicotineClozenge NAHL)CDatabase,CJoannaCBriggsCInstituteCevidence-
sCworkedCbest,CalthoughCbupropionC(Zyban)CorCvareniclineC(Cha basedCresources,CCochraneCReviews,CMedline/CPubMed
ntix)CandCnicotineClozengesCworkedCwell,Ctoo.CACCochraneCRevie 4. MeasureCpatientCoutcomesCbeforeCinstitutingCtheCevidence-
wCfoundCthatCadviceCandCsupportCfromCnursingCstaffCcanCincreaseC basedCchangeCinCpracticeCsoCcomparisonsCcanCbeCmadeCafterCim
patients’CsuccessCinCquit- plementationCtoCdetermineCifCtheCinter-CventionCworked
CtingCsmoking,CespeciallyCinCaChospitalCsetting. 5. EvaluateCtheCresultsCtoCdetermineCwhetherCtheCchangeCmadeC
aCsignificantCdifferenceCandCifCitCwasCvaluableCinCtermsCofCcostC
VOCABULARY andCtime
SampleCsentencesCwillCvaryCforCtheCVocabularyCproblems. REVIEWC QUESTIONS
1. Evidence- TheCcorrectCanswersCareCinCboldface.
basedCpractice:CACsystematicCprocessCthatCusesCcurrentCevidenceC
inCmakingCdecisionsCaboutCpatientCcare. 1. (3)CisCcorrect.CProvidingCanCexplanationCofCwhyCsome-
2. Evidence- CthingCisCdoneCpromotesCtheCunderstandingCforCwhyCitCisCimpor

informedCpractice:CConsiderationCofCpatientCfactorsCalongCwithCt tantCtoCbeCdoneCandCthereforeCwillCmoreClikelyCbeCdone.C(1,C2,C
heCuseCofCevidenceCforCsharedCdecisionCmakingCbetweenCtheChealt 4)ConlyCcommunicateCtheCneedCtoCperformCaCtask.CTheyCdoCnotC
h-careCproviderCandCtheCpatient. provideCrationaleCforCtheCtaskCtoCpro-
CmoteCunderstandingCofCtheCimportanceCofCtheCtask.
3. RandomizedCcontrolledCtrials:CTrueCexperimentalCstudiesCinCwhi
chCasCmanyCfactorsCasCpossibleCthatCcouldCfalselyCchangeCtheCresu 2. (3)CisCcorrect.CEvidence-
ltsCareCcontrolled. basedCnursingCcareCthatChasCbeenCevaluatedCasCappropriateCforCanC
4. Research:CScientificCstudy,Cinvestigation,CorCexperimenta- agencyCprovidesCtheCbestCandCsafestCpatientCcare.C(1)COpinionsCm
CtionCtoCestablishCfactsCandCanalyzeCtheirCsignificance.
ayCnotCbeCbasedCon
5. SystematicCreview:CACreviewCofCrelevantCresearchCusingCguideli
nes.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
EliteScholars Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
39
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
6
Documenten
1021
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden
ACADEMIC HALL STORE!!!!

As a scholar you need a trusted source for your study materials and thats where we come in. Here you get TOP QUALITY; TESTBANKS, SOLUTION MANUALS, EXAMS & OTHER STUDY MATERIALS!!!!!! 100% GUARANTEED Success When you purchase our documents, Please leave reviews so we can meet up to your satisfaction .''At academic hall store'' your good grades is our top priority!!!

4,9

235 beoordelingen

5
230
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen