EDL3703
Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number:
Due Date: 17 March 2025
LEGAL OPINION ON THE PROPOSED LITIGATION BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF
HOËRSKOOL ERASMUS (WORD COUNT: 2300 WORDS)
1. INTRODUCTION
This legal opinion evaluates the Governing Body (hereinafter ―GB‖) of Hoërskool Erasmus’s
likelihood of success should it pursue legal action against the provincial department of
education. The school, situated east of Bloemfontein, was instructed in 2014 to admit 42 black
English-speaking learners. The GB contends that Hoërskool Erasmus is traditionally
Afrikaans-medium and that it was effectively ―bullied‖ into accommodating these learners
despite inadequate resources to cater for their language and educational needs. The GB
believes that the department exceeded its authority by imposing this admission decision
without due regard to the school’s language policy and capacity constraints.
In what follows, I will provide an overview of the relevant constitutional and statutory
frameworks, focusing in particular on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
Terms
1996, and the South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 (―the Schools Act‖). I will also of use
refer to
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
Assignment 1 Semester 1 2025
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations
Unique number:
Due Date: 17 March 2025
LEGAL OPINION ON THE PROPOSED LITIGATION BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF
HOËRSKOOL ERASMUS (WORD COUNT: 2300 WORDS)
1. INTRODUCTION
This legal opinion evaluates the Governing Body (hereinafter ―GB‖) of Hoërskool Erasmus’s
likelihood of success should it pursue legal action against the provincial department of
education. The school, situated east of Bloemfontein, was instructed in 2014 to admit 42 black
English-speaking learners. The GB contends that Hoërskool Erasmus is traditionally
Afrikaans-medium and that it was effectively ―bullied‖ into accommodating these learners
despite inadequate resources to cater for their language and educational needs. The GB
believes that the department exceeded its authority by imposing this admission decision
without due regard to the school’s language policy and capacity constraints.
In what follows, I will provide an overview of the relevant constitutional and statutory
frameworks, focusing in particular on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
Terms
1996, and the South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 (―the Schools Act‖). I will also of use
refer to
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
