, You act for ADB Cables (Pty) Ltd, a supplier of high voltage electricity
cables. Brown Electrical (Pty) Ltd is one of the customers of ADB Cables and
Yo
the latter on 01 October 2024 supplied cables to Brown Electrical on terms
requiring payment to be made within 60 days of delivery. You are
approached by ADB Cables with instructions to recover an amount of R1.2M
which is owed to your client by Brown Cables. You proceed to serve Brown
Electrical with a demand. Upon receipt of the demand, Brown Electrical,
through its sole director and shareholder, Dennis Brown, informs you that
Brown Electrical acknowledges its debt to ADB Cables and subsequently
enters into an acknowledgement of debt (AOD). Brown Electrical
subsequently fails to abide by the payment procedure agreed upon in the
AOD.
(a) Would you advise ADB Cables to make use of the Provisional
Sentence Procedure to recover the amount owing? Provide reason(s)
for your answer. (6 marks)
No, I would not advise ADB Cables (Pty) Ltd to make use of the Provisional
Sentence Procedure to recover the amount owed by Brown Electrical (Pty)
Ltd. The Provisional Sentence Procedure is typically used when a creditor
possesses a liquid document, which is a written instrument that is clear,
unconditional, and readily enforceable. Such documents include cheques,
promissory notes, and mortgage bonds. However, an Acknowledgment of
Debt (AOD) does not necessarily qualify as a liquid document in this
context.
The essence of the Provisional Sentence Procedure is to provide a swift
and efficient remedy for creditors who hold a liquid document, allowing
them to obtain judgment without undergoing a lengthy trial. The procedure
, is particularly advantageous when a creditor has an undisputed, written
acknowledgment of a debt that meets the strict legal requirements of a
liquid document. The key requirement for this procedure is that the
document itself must contain an unconditional and clear obligation to pay a
specific amount of money. A cheque, for example, clearly reflects an
obligation to pay, and once dishonored, it serves as sufficient proof of
indebtedness. A mortgage bond also meets this requirement because it
explicitly sets out the terms of repayment and security for the debt.
However, an Acknowledgment of Debt, while strong evidence of liability,
may not meet the strict requirements of a liquid document as recognized in
the Provisional Sentence Procedure.
One reason why an AOD may not be suitable for the Provisional Sentence
Procedure is that it does not necessarily contain an unconditional obligation
to pay a specified sum without further proof. Even if the debtor has signed
the AOD, courts may require additional evidence to confirm its
enforceability. The court could scrutinize the terms of the AOD, particularly
if the debtor claims that payment was conditional on certain events or that
there were underlying disputes that were not addressed when signing the
document. Unlike a promissory note or cheque, which serves as a
straightforward financial commitment, an AOD may contain clauses that
complicate its enforceability under the Provisional Sentence Procedure.
Another challenge in using the Provisional Sentence Procedure in this case
is the risk of defenses being raised, which could delay the process. Even
though Brown Electrical has acknowledged the debt, it may raise defenses
that could weaken ADB Cables’ case. The debtor could argue that the AOD
was signed under duress, misrepresentation, or mistake. Additionally,
cables. Brown Electrical (Pty) Ltd is one of the customers of ADB Cables and
Yo
the latter on 01 October 2024 supplied cables to Brown Electrical on terms
requiring payment to be made within 60 days of delivery. You are
approached by ADB Cables with instructions to recover an amount of R1.2M
which is owed to your client by Brown Cables. You proceed to serve Brown
Electrical with a demand. Upon receipt of the demand, Brown Electrical,
through its sole director and shareholder, Dennis Brown, informs you that
Brown Electrical acknowledges its debt to ADB Cables and subsequently
enters into an acknowledgement of debt (AOD). Brown Electrical
subsequently fails to abide by the payment procedure agreed upon in the
AOD.
(a) Would you advise ADB Cables to make use of the Provisional
Sentence Procedure to recover the amount owing? Provide reason(s)
for your answer. (6 marks)
No, I would not advise ADB Cables (Pty) Ltd to make use of the Provisional
Sentence Procedure to recover the amount owed by Brown Electrical (Pty)
Ltd. The Provisional Sentence Procedure is typically used when a creditor
possesses a liquid document, which is a written instrument that is clear,
unconditional, and readily enforceable. Such documents include cheques,
promissory notes, and mortgage bonds. However, an Acknowledgment of
Debt (AOD) does not necessarily qualify as a liquid document in this
context.
The essence of the Provisional Sentence Procedure is to provide a swift
and efficient remedy for creditors who hold a liquid document, allowing
them to obtain judgment without undergoing a lengthy trial. The procedure
, is particularly advantageous when a creditor has an undisputed, written
acknowledgment of a debt that meets the strict legal requirements of a
liquid document. The key requirement for this procedure is that the
document itself must contain an unconditional and clear obligation to pay a
specific amount of money. A cheque, for example, clearly reflects an
obligation to pay, and once dishonored, it serves as sufficient proof of
indebtedness. A mortgage bond also meets this requirement because it
explicitly sets out the terms of repayment and security for the debt.
However, an Acknowledgment of Debt, while strong evidence of liability,
may not meet the strict requirements of a liquid document as recognized in
the Provisional Sentence Procedure.
One reason why an AOD may not be suitable for the Provisional Sentence
Procedure is that it does not necessarily contain an unconditional obligation
to pay a specified sum without further proof. Even if the debtor has signed
the AOD, courts may require additional evidence to confirm its
enforceability. The court could scrutinize the terms of the AOD, particularly
if the debtor claims that payment was conditional on certain events or that
there were underlying disputes that were not addressed when signing the
document. Unlike a promissory note or cheque, which serves as a
straightforward financial commitment, an AOD may contain clauses that
complicate its enforceability under the Provisional Sentence Procedure.
Another challenge in using the Provisional Sentence Procedure in this case
is the risk of defenses being raised, which could delay the process. Even
though Brown Electrical has acknowledged the debt, it may raise defenses
that could weaken ADB Cables’ case. The debtor could argue that the AOD
was signed under duress, misrepresentation, or mistake. Additionally,
