Supervisory System of The ILO
Procedure REGULAR procedure SPECIAL procedures
Based on reports; bodies have to report to the ILO what There is three special procedures
they have done to ratify a convention
Examination of Country Reports Representation Complaint procedure (most severe Freedom of association
procedure)
I. BODIES CEACR* CAS** Tri-Ct* ; Cs Inq*** ; CFA***** ;
20 experts Standing body Ad hoc body Ad hoc body Standing body
ILC*** 3 members GB** 3 members GB 9 members GB
II. LEGAL Articles 22/23 Articles 22/23 Articles 24/25 Art. 26-34 Principles of FoA
Preamble 1919 constitution
Philadelphia Declaration 1944
C87 and C98
III. PARTIES Member States MS Employees / workers VS MS (or del. ILC or GB) vs MS Employees / workers is M.S.
M.S.
Ook als de confention niet ratified is
IV. Observations Conclusions Recommendation; if the Recommendation > article 33 gives the Recommendations
OUTCOME Direct requests Black List: No fines or whatever, answer of the government GB the right to put on sanctions > has Direct contact missions
“Annual Report” but just a way of applying is not satisfactory been only once in 100 years
“General Survey” political pressure
The accused may also go to the
ICJ**** however this has never
happened before
Action under Art. 33
V. MISC. 1926 1926 1919 1919 1951
TECHnical examination POLitical analysis Standing orders Hearings Hearings Not just ratifying MS Digrest of
All ratified conventions Pressing cases 170 On-site Visits Decisions
Follow-up REP/FoA 13 3300, FFCC > 6
So 170 representations
So 13 complaints So 3300 cases
* Committee of experts (on application of conventions and *Triparty Committee
recommendations) **Government Body
evaluate annual reports; observations (comments) or direct requests ***Commission of Inquiry
(more technical) ****International Court of Justice
** Committee Application of Standards *****Committee of Freedom of Association
*** International Labour Conference
Procedure REGULAR procedure SPECIAL procedures
Based on reports; bodies have to report to the ILO what There is three special procedures
they have done to ratify a convention
Examination of Country Reports Representation Complaint procedure (most severe Freedom of association
procedure)
I. BODIES CEACR* CAS** Tri-Ct* ; Cs Inq*** ; CFA***** ;
20 experts Standing body Ad hoc body Ad hoc body Standing body
ILC*** 3 members GB** 3 members GB 9 members GB
II. LEGAL Articles 22/23 Articles 22/23 Articles 24/25 Art. 26-34 Principles of FoA
Preamble 1919 constitution
Philadelphia Declaration 1944
C87 and C98
III. PARTIES Member States MS Employees / workers VS MS (or del. ILC or GB) vs MS Employees / workers is M.S.
M.S.
Ook als de confention niet ratified is
IV. Observations Conclusions Recommendation; if the Recommendation > article 33 gives the Recommendations
OUTCOME Direct requests Black List: No fines or whatever, answer of the government GB the right to put on sanctions > has Direct contact missions
“Annual Report” but just a way of applying is not satisfactory been only once in 100 years
“General Survey” political pressure
The accused may also go to the
ICJ**** however this has never
happened before
Action under Art. 33
V. MISC. 1926 1926 1919 1919 1951
TECHnical examination POLitical analysis Standing orders Hearings Hearings Not just ratifying MS Digrest of
All ratified conventions Pressing cases 170 On-site Visits Decisions
Follow-up REP/FoA 13 3300, FFCC > 6
So 170 representations
So 13 complaints So 3300 cases
* Committee of experts (on application of conventions and *Triparty Committee
recommendations) **Government Body
evaluate annual reports; observations (comments) or direct requests ***Commission of Inquiry
(more technical) ****International Court of Justice
** Committee Application of Standards *****Committee of Freedom of Association
*** International Labour Conference
