100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Real-world examples covering ‘Democracy and Participation’ under the A-level Politics Specification

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
33
Geüpload op
30-01-2025
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Real-world examples that can (and have been) used in essays about ‘Democracy and Participation’ from the A-level Politics specification.

Instelling
Vak











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 januari 2025
Aantal pagina's
33
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Overig
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

1`Democracy and Participation

Representative Democracy
RD positives + Evidence that the UK system is representative:
Representatives provide more efficient / enhanced decision making

University Educated MPs
-​ 86% of MP's have gone to university, a study done on 13th december, 2019.
-​ Equips them with a deeper understanding of political, economic and social issues.
-​ More informed decisions made?

Coronavirus Act 2020
-​ Introduced and passed with extraordinary speed in March 2020.
-​ Received royal assent just 2 days after it was introduced.
-​ granted extensive powers to the govt, including authority to shut down events and venues, impose restrictions on public gatherings
and detain individuals suspected of infection.
-​ rapid enactment underscores the capability of RD to respond quickly in a crisis, crucial for effective management of public health and
safety in emergencies.
-​ Elected official equipped to handle complex issues

Expert Governance - Access to expert advice,

The UK's response to the COVID-19 pandemic
-​ Heavily relied on advice from SAGE, which included leading experts from various fields.
-​ These experts provided real-time data and modelling that informed critical decisions, such as the timing of lockdowns and social
distancing measures.
-​ This reliance on expert advice demonstrates how representative democracies can harness specialised knowledge for public policy
decision-making, which might be unfeasible in direct democracy settings where such nuanced understanding would be difficult to
achieve at scale.


Recall elections shows that representatives are held to account

Fiona Onasanya
-​ 1 May 2019 after lying to the police in order to avoid being prosecuted for speeding.
-​ demonstrates holding MPs to account in between GE
-​ Fiona Onasanya who lied about getting speeding in order to get out of a speeding ticket on 24th of July, 2017, this triggered a recall
election and eventually she was found guilty and had to step down from being an MP of peterborough.
-​ ensures lack of corruption in RD


There are initiatives aimed at improving transparency and accountability within the UK government

Open Government Partnership (OGP) since 2011
-​ Led to several initiatives aimed at enhancing govt transparency
-​ Steps towards more open data practices where govt has committed to publishing key datasets on public spending and govt operations
makes it easier for public to access and scrutinise got actions


Increase in the number of political parties to support variety of views
Also supports a wide range of ideologies.

No. parties now vs 2010
-​ In 2010 there were only three main political parties however over the years this has extended to more.


Wide range of ideologies - represents diverse interests

Scottish MPs
-​ have been instrumental in voicing regional concerns nad needs such as debated over Scottish independence and regional funding.
-​ RD accommodates regional diversity within a unified legislative body


RD is good to use when needing to respond to a crisis rapidly
Practical in a large political system -> efficiency in decisions making -> Cabinet Office

Iraq
-​ Deployment of troops

COVID
-​ lockdowns and vaccination programs introduced rapidly
-​ emergency legislation - lockdown / economic support packages / vaccinations,

,Brexit ref 2016
-​ complex pieces of legislation managed

Good for large society -> prevents coalitions and produces strong and stable govt



FPTP electoral system works well in RD

2019 GE
-​ Significant majority enabled Cons to proceed with Brexit without deadlock
-​ -> clear majority -> clearer decisions.
-​ More effective = no need for negotiations like under coalition
-​ Clear election results + Strong and stable govt + free and fair voting + majority govt

Prevents coalitions

Guardian 2010
-​ Poll said that 80% people believe the Coalition govt in 2010 is ‘more confused’

Recent GEs
-​ 8/10 of last government since 1979 were all formation of majority governments
-​ Clearer decisions / more efficient -> better for large society


Prevents ‘tyranny of the majority’

Minor Party representation -> SNP and Green
-​ The representation of smaller parties like the SNP and the Green Party in Parliament ensures that regional and specific interest groups
have a voice in the legislative process.
-​ For instance, the SNP has been instrumental in pushing for policies that address Scotland-specific issues, such as advocating for
Scottish interests in Brexit negotiations and promoting legislation on climate change tailored to Scotland's unique environmental
landscape.

Representatives have to be re-elected

Stability and predictability
FTPA 2011
Initially aimed to provide more predictability in UK political landscape by setting fixed parliamentary terms -> this stability is crucial


RD gives minorities a voice in parliament and helps to protect minority rights through legislation

Equal Marriage Act 2013
-​ legalised SSM
-​ passed through representative democratic processes
-​ reflected how the needs and rights of LGBTQ+ minority is represented
-​ demonstrates how RD protects minority rights

RD

Snoopers Charter
Positive evidence of snoopers charter:
-​ increased power of intelligence agencies could increase security of people in the uk- protect them -> these policies have more
legitimacy in the wider scheme of the constitution direct democracy would not allow the necessary unpopular policies to pass

Voter apathy in DD makes RD superior

2011 AV ref
-​ Turnout = 42%

Whereas RD ->
2019 GE
-​ Turnout = above 67%

RD allows for accountability & MPs represent constituencies by going against govt policies

MPs rebelled against Liz Truss’ government and abstained in vote on banning fracking
-​ In October 2022, 33 Conservative MPs rebelled against Liz Truss' government and abstained in a vote on banning fracking,
-​ Despite the government ordering them to oppose it,
-​ This included many MP Mark Fletcher of Bolsover which had a strong local movement against fracking in the area.

,Free and fair elections


Effective for large societies

Representative democracy is the most effective system for efficient democratic functioning of a large society - almost essential for effect
legislative and executive decision making.
Direct democracy would decrease the productivity of a country - people become consumed in political matters .
Constituency clinics allows as a form of direct democracy.

Supported by the public

Av referendum
●​ Saw an overwhelming defeat for a proportion representative system illustrating that the general electorate don't want a proportional
system.
●​ 68% no 32% yes

Experts

It is argued the representative democracy is the most effective legislative system within the UK and the expert opinions of MPs who have been
democratically elected to parliament should be trusted.

Theorist Edmund Burke wrote "Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement and he betrays, instead of serving you, if
he sacrifices it to your opinion".

Emergence of digital platforms has empowered citizens to engage in politics - gives them power in RD

BLM & MeToo movements
-​ Movements like #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo demonstrates the potential for grassroots mobilisation and advocacy.
-​ Activism places issues of social justice, which may be overlooked, at the forefront of national political debates.
-​ RD may be adapting to incorporate new forms of civic engagement , this extending power dynamics to the people.

Safeguards in place to protect from elite capture

Advocates of the current system argue that the existence of regulatory frameworks and transparency measures prevents undue influence by
elites. Additionally, they contend that political donations are essential for funding parties and maintaining democratic competition.
However, evidence suggests that loopholes and lax enforcement undermine the effectiveness of these safeguards, allowing elite interests to
wield disproportionate influence.

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 200
●​ Advocates of the current system often point to the regulatory framework governing political donations, such as the Political Parties,
Elections and Referendums Act 2000, as evidence of safeguards against elite capture.

PPERA - sets out how they are regulated in the UK
●​ By setting limits and transparency require net on donations, they prevent a small elite from dominating the political discourse -
preserving influence of the general electorate.
●​ Ensures that in Red power isn’t concentrated amongst a few - distributed.

Supporters of the first-past-the-post system argue that it provides clarity and decisiveness in election outcomes.

2019 general election
-​ The Conservative Party's clear majority allowed for the swift formation of a government and facilitated the implementation of
Brexit-related policies without the need for protracted coalition negotiations.
-​ Brexit was voted for by the people in a referendum.

Free and Fair elections


Devolution

Scotland Act 1998
●​ Saw the creation of the Scottish Parliament -> have many powers.
●​ Representation for Scottish people has increased.
●​ Scottish people have their own democratic parliament who have many law-making powers.
BUT:
Fragmented distribution of power between other states. No English parliament?

Pressure groups
●​ Involvement in pressure groups has increased across younger populations.

, RD negatives + Evidence that the UK system is not representative:

UK system not representative:

2015
-​ UKIP won 13% of the national vote but only got 1 seat.
-​ The SNP won 2% of the national vote but won 56 seats.

Devolution

WLQ
-​ -> Increase in tuition in England and Wales only based on Scottish votes.
-​ But Scot MPs can vote on English or Welsh issues: undermines representation of people.

Turnout issues:

1997 -> 71%
2001 -> 59%

Uneducated citizens = apathy

Most general election turnouts are around 60-68% for example in the 2019 general election.

Only vote every 5 years -> avoids accountability

Claudia Webbe
-​ Threatened to send naked pictures of a woman to her family out of jealousy of a friendship she had with her partner as well as being
threatening to use acid against Michelle Merritt

Bad social representation

Social representation of MPs
●​ 29% of MPs are women and only 6% of MPs make up ethnic minorities.
●​ Ukip secured 4 millions votes but only secured 1 seat unlike the Scottish national party that got 1.5 million votes and got 56 seats.

Turnout

May 2016 local elections
●​ Average turnout in May 2016 local elections was 33.8%

Lack of participation

Political party membership
●​ Only 1.6% of electorate belong to one of three main parties, so don't use this ability

Political Parties are run by elites

Wealthy run media so raise business interests but not held accountable

Rupert Murdoch
●​ Murdoch group has owned The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun.
●​ Representatives may distort people's minds to suit own political agenda, undermining democracy

Minorities under-represented

HOC elected with FPTP -> produces mismatch vote and seat share
2 party system -> not representing minor parties


Representatives more interest in party politics, not national interest -> control over members

2009 parliamentary expenses scandal
●​ -> MPs made false claims for mortgage payments, home insurance, and a duck house!
●​ Lead to negative public perception of politicians as corrupt, incompetent, betray promises and put party before electorate


Politicians may put their interests and their party's interests before those of the people and betray election promises.

2010 LibDems
For example in 2010 when the Liberal Democrats didn’t follow manifesto promises to scrap tuition fees for students when in coalition government
with the Conservatives.


Quick decision making can lead to oversight and inadequate consultation

Coronavirus Act 2020
●​ The same Coronavirus Act 2020 drew significant criticism for the way it was expedited through Parliament without the usual levels of
scrutiny or debate.
€15,36
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
hanmulv

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
hanmulv
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
0
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
-

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen