100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Ethics: Federal tax practice and procedures UPDATED Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
15
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-01-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Ethics: Federal tax practice and procedures UPDATED Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers Underpayments and penalties - CORRECT ANSWER - 20% penalty on the following underpayments: 1. Underpayments attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations 2. Substantial understatement of income tax. This amount is offset by amounts for which the tax treatment is adequately disclosed and there is a reasonable basis (≥20% chance of being sustained) for the tax treatment. Or there was substantial authority for claimed tax treatment

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Federal Taxation
Vak
Federal Taxation









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Federal Taxation
Vak
Federal Taxation

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 januari 2025
Aantal pagina's
15
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Ethics: Federal tax practice and procedures
UPDATED Exam Questions and
CORRECT Answers
Underpayments and penalties - CORRECT ANSWER - 20% penalty on the following
underpayments:


1. Underpayments attributable to negligence or disregard of rules or regulations


2. Substantial understatement of income tax. This amount is offset by amounts for which the tax
treatment is adequately disclosed and there is a reasonable basis (≥20% chance of being
sustained) for the tax treatment. Or there was substantial authority for claimed tax treatment.


3. Undisclosed position must be supported by substantial authority which requires a ≥40%
chance of being sustained.


Underpayments due to negligence - CORRECT ANSWER - "Negligence" is "any failure to
make a reasonable attempt to comply with" the rules.


1. Failure to keep adequate books and records.
2. Taxpayer conduct—Did the taxpayer make reasonable attempts to get it right?
3. Taxpayer positions—A taxpayer position that lacks a "reasonable basis" may be attributed to
negligence.
4. Disclosure of a position that is negligently taken is not a defense.


Underpayments due to disregard - CORRECT ANSWER - "Disregard" may be negligent,
reckless, or intentional.
Negligent and reckless disregard largely overlap with the "negligence" provision of the statute.

, Intentional disregard may be problematic but is not necessarily wrongful just because the
taxpayer takes a tax position that is ultimately found to be erroneous. A "good-faith" mistake of
law provides a defense.


1. Disclosure of a position on a Form 8275 or 8275-R may provide a defense to any penalty for
intentional disregard if the position has a reasonable basis and the taxpayer has kept adequate
books and records to properly substantiate necessary items.


Reasonable cause - CORRECT ANSWER - No penalty is imposed if (a) there was
"reasonable cause" for the underpayment and (b) the taxpayer acted with "good faith."


*Reasonable cause* - The exercise of ordinary care, *Judged objectively*


example: Reliance on tax adviser and/or
Reliance on advice of IRS employee.


Standards of belief - CORRECT ANSWER - Undisclosed position—"Substantial authority"
(≥40% chance of being sustained)


Disclosed position—"Reasonable basis" (≥20% chance of being sustained)


Tax shelter position—"More likely than not" (>50% chance)


Good Faith - CORRECT ANSWER - Definition—Honesty of purpose
*Judged subjectively*


Examples:
Reliance on erroneous W-2, with no red flags to indicate its inaccuracy.


Reliance on erroneous advice of tax adviser where:
€10,08
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
MGRADES Stanford University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1069
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
102
Documenten
68976
Laatst verkocht
11 uur geleden
MGRADES (Stanford Top Brains)

Welcome to MGRADES Exams, practices and Study materials Just think of me as the plug you will refer to your friends Me and my team will always make sure you get the best value from the exams markets. I offer the best study and exam materials for a wide range of courses and units. Make your study sessions more efficient and effective. Dive in and discover all you need to excel in your academic journey!

3,8

169 beoordelingen

5
73
4
30
3
44
2
8
1
14

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen