100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary 1.7 Problem 7

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
9
Geüpload op
22-04-2020
Geschreven in
2018/2019

summary for p7 for 1.7










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Onbekend
Geüpload op
22 april 2020
Aantal pagina's
9
Geschreven in
2018/2019
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Problem 7 – Spector, Randall

Job satisfaction: reflects how people feel about their jobs overall, as well as various aspects of the
job. Pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job.

3 approaches on how job satisfaction develops:
1) Work attitudes such as job satisfaction are dispositional in nature. They are stable
dispositions learned through experience or they stem from a person’s genetic
inheritance. Job satisfaction has more of the properties of trait than attitude. This then
implies that attempts to improve satisfaction by changing jobs would be doomed to
fail. Impact of genetic factors means that workers need to be given opportunities to
shape their own work environments in line with inherited preferences.
2) Social information processing model: suggests job satisfaction and other work place
attitudes are developed out of experiences and information provided by others at
work. Satisfaction is in part how other people in the work place interpret and evaluate
what goes on.
3) Information processing model: accumulation of cognitive information about the
workplace and one’s job. A person’s job satisfaction is influences most directly by the
characteristics of their job and the extent to which those characteristics match with
what the person wants in a job.

Job satisfaction has both cognitive and affective components. This means that for some people
their stable disposition to feel happy or sad drives the affective component. The cognitive
component is more likely to be influenced by their experiences at work. The cognitive component
becomes less important, as there is a good amount of evidence that some people are simply more
satisfied than others by their nature.

There have been 2 approaches to study job satisfaction:
- Global approach: treats job satisfaction as a single, overall feelings toward to job.
- Facet approach: focus on different aspects of the job
- Most commonly studies facets are: pay, promotion, working conditions, communication,
fringe benefits, co-workers, supervision and nature of work

- Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) scale that assess eight popular facets of job satisfaction.
o It shows that Americans are mostly satisfied with their supervisors, coworkers and
the nature of their work but less satisfied with rewards such as pay, promotion and
fringe benefits.
- Multinational surveys: highest job satisfaction in Scandinavia, Germany and Austria; lowest
in Eastern Europe (Slovakia, Poland, Bulgaria)

Cultural values:
- People from collectivist countries are more satisfied with coworkers than individualist
countries.
- Power distance also relates to job satisfaction, people who are tolerant of large power
distances are less satisfied with their jobs.
- Masculinity reflects the emphasis on achievement and Scandinavian countries are low on
this value, rather emphasize on health and well-being (feministic).
- Uncertainty avoidance reflects the level of comfort in unpredictable situations. Countries
high on dimension tend to be rule oriented. Highest are: Greece and Portugal.

, ASSESSMENT OF JOB SATISFACTION:
- Either by questionnaire or by interview.

1) Job Descriptive Index (JDI):
- Has been the most popular with researchers.
- The most thoroughly validated.
- Assesses 5 facets: work, pay, promotion opportunities, supervision, coworkers
- 72 items in total with their respective subscales.
- Limitation: it only has 5 subscales and might not cover all facets of the job

2) Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ):
- Comes in 2 forms, a 100-item long version and a 20-item short version.
- Both versions ask about 20 facets of job satisfaction: activity, independence, variety, social
status, supervision (HR), supervision (technical), moral values, security, social service,
authority, ability utilization, policies, compensation, advancement, responsibility,
creativity, working conditions, coworkers, recognition, achievement.
- Facets scores are only computed for the long version.
- The short version is used to assess either global satisfaction or intrinsic (refers to the
nature of the job and how people feel about the work they do) and extrinsic satisfaction
(concerns aspects of work situation, e.g. pay).

3) Job in General Scale (JIG):
- A scale of global satisfaction with items that don’t reflect the various facets of the job.
- JIG was patterned on JDI.
- Has 18 items about the job in general.
- This scale has good reliability and correlates well with other scales on overall satisfaction.

Others: The job satisfaction scales of Warr, job satisfaction scale of the occupational stress
indicator, overall job satisfaction scale.

FACTORS OF JOB SATISFACTION:
- Environmental perspective: features of jobs and organizations.
o But people with the same jobs and highly similar conditions can vary in their
satisfaction.
- Personality perspective: types of people are inclined to like or dislike a job
- Interactionist perspective: combines environment and personality = person-job fit

1) Environmental Factors

Job Characteristics: refers to the content and nature of job tasks themselves.
- Skill variety: number of different skills necessary to do a job
- Task identity: whether or not an employee does an entire job or a piece of job
- Task significance: the impact a job has on other people
- Autonomy: the freedom employees have to do their jobs as they see fit
- Task feedback: the extent it’s obvious to employees that they are doing their jobs correctly
- They combined these 5 core characteristics to define the scope or complexity and
challenge of a job.
- They suggest that high scope leads to job satisfaction and low scope leads to boredom and
dissatisfaction.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
ebru1365 Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
131
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
83
Documenten
145
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

4,3

37 beoordelingen

5
24
4
5
3
5
2
1
1
2

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen