100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary - Social Media (LIX017B05)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Geüpload op
06-11-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Summary of all lectures for the course Social Media











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
6 november 2024
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Social media
Summary lectures
G. Mills
Exam: 23-06-2022

Week 1: Introduction

Basic concepts:
- Centralization
- Platform vs. Publisher

Some revision: decentralized internet
- Centralized → e.g. broadcasting

Decentralized: network of networks (internet infrastructure)

Social media: (re-) centralizes control
E.g. Facebook re-centralization of control

(De)centralized control in social media

Centralized:
- E.g. email lists, message boards, reddit, facebook
- All communication passes through a central point of control
- Benevdent dictators = controller has a dictatorial control

Distributed:
- E.g. file-sharing torrents, some music-streaming and chat applications, diaspora (social
networking service), bitcoin, Ethereum and other blockchain technologies.
- Communication is peer-to-peer
- Lack of central node makes absolute control very difficult → almost
impossible to switch off/censor

Multiple reasons why control is necessary:
- Spam, flaming, fraud, sensitive topics, PR

Social media provide levels of control over their basic elements, e.g.
Restricting who can:
- Create
- Edit
- Read
- Invite
- Respond
- Subscribe

, - Share

Deciding the right kinds of barriers to entry is fundamentally important!

Closed systems:
- High levels of control
- Provide details before logging in (email, validated credit card)
- Limited access to content until verified
- Exclude “social deviants”
- Problem = reduces the community size and the number of contributions

Open systems:
- Less control, more anonymity
- Greater potential for spam and advertising
- But openness can attract high quality posts and self-regulation of spam

Control structures influence how social media sites are governed

Control: freedom of speech → is James Wright Foley

Facebook: policy change
- Permits pictures of violence, including executions and beheadings
- As long as the user does not express support
But,
- Facebook bans images of breasts
- Even of breastfeeding

Are social media publishers or platforms?
Platforms:
- Telephone
- Post
- SMS
- DHL
→ Very limited responsibility for what is transmitted
Publishers: Newspapers, books, films
- Make editorial decisions
- Strong legal responsibility
- Twitter/Facebook are increasingly positioning themselves as news sites

Question:
- How much control turns a platform into a publisher
- What are the criteria for Twitter taking control (banning, deleting)
- Who (or what) should control the flow of information

, Algorithmic curation of news (feed)
Before:
- All friend’s posts displayed in your feed
- Content ordered by time

Now: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram
- You see less than <20% of what your friends post
- Content is curated by algorithms
→ Hidden
→ Reordered
→ Promoted
→ Content is placed around ads to increase clicks on ads

“We learn based on what you’ve done in the past and we quickly learn about the things that
you’re interested in”

Facebook: news feed visibility

NVF = Post x Interest x Creator x Type x Recency

(simplified equation, 100.000 other factors)

Facebook’s solution: trending topics

Publishers, platforms, algorithms

Social media companies are walking a fine line between a neutral platform to host news, and a
subjective media company that creates/curates it.

The algorithms are becoming increasingly “social” but still requiring (some) human oversight &
control

→ Boundary between social algorithm (AL) vs. human is becoming increasingly
blurred

“The value of a (decentralized) communication network is proportional to the square of the
number of its users

Value of network = (number of users) ^2 → Metcalfe’s law

Quantity has its own quality

- People use a (social media) technology because everyone else is using it

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
prmrijnders Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
23
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
9
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen