100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

FTCE ESE k-12

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
24
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
29-10-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

Exam of 24 pages for the course FTCE ESE k-12 at FTCE ESE k-12 (FTCE ESE k-12)

Instelling
FTCE ESE K-12
Vak
FTCE ESE k-12










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
FTCE ESE k-12
Vak
FTCE ESE k-12

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
29 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's
24
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

FTCE ESE k-12 GRADE A Q&A
English - (correct answer)


IDEA - (correct answer)Individuals with Disabilities Act. Requires states to provide free,
appropriate public education for all students with disabilities who participate in special
education. The four main challenge areas: learning, social/emotional, motor skills, and
communication. The basic source of law for special education. Represents the latest
phase in the philosophy of educating children with disabilities



*Brown v. Board of Education, 1954 - (correct answer)Topeka, Kansas. Addressed the
inequality of "separate but equal" facilities on the basis of race. School segregation
became illegal.



*Diana v. The State Board of Education, 1970 - (correct answer)This case resulted in
the decision that all children must be tested in their native language



Wyatt v. Stickney, 1971 - (correct answer)Established the right to adequate treatment
(education) for institutionalized persons with mental retardation


*Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, 1972 - (correct answer)The first right to education lawsuit. Laid the
foundation for the right to education for all children with disabilities previously denied if
they had not attained a mental age of 5 by the start of first grade. Special Education
was guaranteed to children with mental retardation. The victory in this case sparked
other court cases for children with other disabilities.



*Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 1972 - (correct answer)The right
to special education was extended to all children with disabilities, not just mentally
retarded children. Judgements in PARC and Mills paved the way for P.L. 94-142.
Students with disabilities must be given education regardless of the schools' financial
limitations.

,Public Law 93-112 (Rehabilitation Amendments of 1973) - (correct answer)The first
comprehensive federal statute to address specifically the rights of disabled youth. It
prohibited illegal discrimination in education, employment, or housing on the basis of a
disability.



Section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - (correct answer)Section 504 expands on older
law by extending its protection to other areas that receive federal assistance, such as
education. Protected individuals must (a) have a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities, such as self-care, walking, seeing,
breathing, working, or learning; (b) have a record of such an impairment; or (c) be
regarded as having such an impairment. A disability in itself is not sufficient grounds for
a complaint of discrimination. The person must be otherwise qualified, or able to meet,
the requirements of the program in question.



Public Law 93-380 (Education Amendments of 1974) - (correct answer)P.L.94-142 is the
funding portion of this act. It required states to provide full educational opportunities for
children with disabilities. It addressed identification, fair evaluation, alternative
placements, due process procedures, and free, appropriate public education.



Public Law 94-142 Education for all Handicapped Children Act), 1975 - (correct
answer)Provided for a free, appropriate public education for all children with disabilities,
defined special education and related services, and imposed rigid guidelines on the
provisions of those services. It paralleled the provision for a free and appropriate public
education in section 504 of Public Law 94-142 and extended these services to
preschool children with disabilities (ages 3-5) through provisions to preschool incentive
grants.


Seven fundamental provisions of IDEA - (correct answer)1. Free Appropriate Public
Education (FAPE)

2. Notification and procedural rights for parents.

3. Identification and services to all children

4. Necessary related services.

5. Individualized assessments
6. Individualized Education Plans (IEP's)

, 7. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)



Goss v. Lopez, 1975 - (correct answer)This case ruled that the state could not deny a
student education without following due process. While this decision is not based on a
special education issue, the process of school suspension and expulsion is obviously
critical in assuring an appropriate public education to children with disabilities.



Public Law 95-56 (Gifted and Talented Children's Act), 1978 - (correct answer)This case
defined the gifted and talented population, and focused upon this exceptionally
category, which was not included in Public Law 94-142



*Larry P. V. Riles, 1979 - (correct answer)This case ordered the reevaluation of black
students enrolled in classes for educable mental retardation (EMR) and enjoined the
California State Department of Education from the use of intelligible tests in subsequent
EMR placement decisions.



Parents in Action on Special Education (PASE) v. Hannon, 1980 - (correct answer)Ruled
that IQ tests are necessarily biased against ethnic and racial subcultures.



Board of Education v. Rowley, 1982 - (correct answer)Amy Rowley was a deaf
elementary school student whose parents rejected their school district's proposal to
provide a tutor and speech therapist services to supplement their daughter's instruction
in the regular classroom. Her parents insisted on an interpreter even though Amy was
making satisfactory social, academic, and educational progress without one. In deciding
in favor of the school district, the Supreme Court ruled that school districts must provide
those services that permit a student with disabilities to benefit from instruction.
Essentially, the court ruled that the states are obligated to provide a "basic floor of
opportunity" that is reasonable to allow the child to benefit from social education.



Public Law 98-199 (Education of the Handicapped Act [EHA] Amendments), 1983 -
(correct answer)P.L. 94-142 was amended to provide added emphasis on parental
education and preschool, secondary, and post-secondary programs for children and
youth with disabilities.
€8,76
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82
5,0
(1)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
douglasmugwe82 Teachme2-tutor
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
4239
Laatst verkocht
2 maanden geleden
fully answered questions and answer

fully answered questions and answer

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen