100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Comprehensive Structured Lecture Notes Advanced Neuropsychology

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
4
Pagina's
123
Geüpload op
28-10-2024
Geschreven in
2024/2025

I’ve carefully worked through these notes after each lecture. They’re really well-structured, with concepts, lists, and examples. I’ve also included a lot of details that the professor shared verbally but weren’t on the slides. For me, this document is a great summary for getting ready for the exam.

Meer zien Lees minder











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 oktober 2024
Aantal pagina's
123
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Varies
Bevat
Alle colleges

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Advanced Neuropsychology Lecture Notes 2024



College 1 - Introduction
Syllogisms
- Major: all mammals are animals
- Minor: all elephants are mammals
- → all elephants are mammals
• Can add up to a wrong conclusion because premises are not correct

Example in neuropsychological conext:
Major: The RAVLT (15WT) is a memory task
Minor: Tim is impaired on the RAVLT
→ Tim has a memory impairment
- No not true because other reasons can make him perform ‘bad’; maybe deaf?
- Keep in mind..after this course you are able to go from model through
innovation to the patient.


Video Casus 73-year-old women
Observations:
- Not really looking, might be blind, left and right occipital damage (stroke)
- When she is touching the pen; she only feels one half because she’s not
aware of the upper half. Maybe she is blind but is not conscious that she is
blind (antonagnosia)?
- Didn’t notice light go off
- She saw someone passing in the hallway of hospital. How is that possible?
Because of different route in the brain without consciousness/present

Hypothesis:
- Spatial, prosopagnosia, she’s unaware

The purpose of showing this example is; by observing and hypothesis, be creative.

→ Current behavior
Need to be aware of all these factors:


Literature this week
Article 1: how to read an article?
Article 2: DSM-5 - will be discussed in last lecture but read it to apply article 1

How to choose an article, read it purposefully, effectively and systematically?
- Structured abstract: introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD)
- Randomized Control Trial (RCT), Controlled Clinical Trial (CCT), Experiment,
Survey, and Case-control or Cohort study
- Reviews could be non-systematic (narrative) or systematic (including meta-
analysis)
- A case study is a report of a single clinical case


1

,Advanced Neuropsychology Lecture Notes 2024




Dust of.. Neuropsychological examination
Test performance never stand on itself it is always a summation of factors:




Cognitive models




2

,Advanced Neuropsychology Lecture Notes 2024


Task impurity
Task impurity
= no task measures only what you want to measure. A task always measures more
than one skill, making the results less clear.
- Example: the score on an executive functioning (EF) task is determined by
many factors




- Example: go back to the syllogism about Tim and RAVLT memory test, it can
be linked to task impurity.
- It’s not only a disadvantage. It also gives handhelds to understand behavior in
the whole, so that is a good point.

Example exam question (by me): Task impurity seems like an disadvantage, but it is
also a good thing. Explain the advantage?
It also gives handhelds to understand behavior in the whole, so that is a good point.


An experiment
What is an experiment?




Forms of experiments
There are several forms of experiments:
- Behavioral experiments: micro
- Pop-up experiments: meso
- Big data: macro
• When reading an article, keep in mind which scale it is.




Experimental set up…
- Reliable
- Valid
- Feasible


3

, Advanced Neuropsychology Lecture Notes 2024

- Theoretically sound
- Data friendly…
- Ethical
Hypothesis = KEY!




Ethics
- Rules and regulations, values, research, moral principles, ethical practices,
rules of conduct
Example exam questions
Q1:
a) History taking through a clinical interview is of high relevance. Come up with 4
elements a good clinical interview should be built upon, and argument them briefly (1
to 2 sentences maximum). (uitgebreid in college en slides behandeld; 0.5 pt + 0.5 pt
if the argument is OK; maximum 4 pt)
1. The interview should be structured - Structure is important to help the patient
provide you with all the necessary information, to address most aspects
2. The interview should be hypotheses-driven - Without a hypothesis an interview
lacks the sharpness to get all information out and, moreover, to make sense of
this information and to know what to ask next
3. The interview should be built on mutual respect and feeling of safety -
Explaining what you don’t understand yourself or what is your biggest fear is
not easy and this asks for trust in the professional.
4. The interview should be built upon (easily accessible) theoretical knowledge of
cognitive models - This is closely linked to the hypothesis. It is your duty to
integrate the information you get from the patient with your theoretical
knowledge.
5. The interview should take the context of the patient into account (e.g.
expectancies, culture, cognitive impairments) Behandeld in college next level.

b) Neuropsychological tasks are meant to elicit behavior in such a way that it helps to
understand possible changes in that behavior. This comes with some pitfalls, one of
which is task impurity. Explain what is meant with task impurity (2 pt) and provide an
example of it (2 pt).
Task impurity refers to the fact that any cognitive task never measures ‘only’ one
concept, is always asks for other function to come up with the good
behavior/response (2 pt). An example is a test for verbal memory. This refers not only
to verbal memory but also to language function (if you have no understanding of the
words you have to remember, this seriously hampers your performance) or any other
example in this line of reasoning (2 pt). behandeld in college introduction



4

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
Rs02 Universiteit Utrecht
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
35
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
5
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden

4,5

2 beoordelingen

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen