100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary 4.2 Groups at work Problem #4

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
6
Geüpload op
12-12-2019
Geschreven in
2017/2018

A comprehensive summary of the fourth problem of course 4.2 "Groups at work" at the Master Positive Organizational Psychology / Work and Organizational Psychology at the Erasmus University Rotterdam. Most articles are effectively summarized in one or maximal two pages and in bullet points. Articles included are: - Manz & Sims, 1987 – The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams - Cohen & Bailey, 1997 - Druskat & Wheeler, 2003 – Effective Leadership of SMWT - Morgeson, 2005 – External Leadershipt of SMWT: Context of Novel & Disruptive Events - Mathieu, Maynard, Rapp, & Gilson, 2008 - Wang, Waldman, Zhang, 2014 - Meta-Analysis of Shared Leadership & Team Effectiveness - Taggar, Hacket, & Saha, 1999 – Leadership Emergence in Autonomous Work Teams - Carson, Tesluk, & Marrone, 2007 – Shared Leadership in Teams - Kozlowski & Bell, 2001 - Work Groups & Teams in Organizations

Meer zien Lees minder









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 december 2019
Aantal pagina's
6
Geschreven in
2017/2018
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

4.2 #4 LG1: What is a self-managing team? Creation?
What is the role of an “external” leader in leading the team effectively?
Manz & Sims, 1987 – The External Leadership of Self-Managing Teams

Self-managing Teams: usually include a whole task; members who each possess a variety of relevant
skills; much autonomy in decision making, compensation & feedback about group performance
 characterized by the attempt to create a high degree of decision-making autonomy &
behavioral control at the work-group level

Purpose: identify specific self-management-team leader behaviors

Method: Observation, interviews, & literature search in a medium-sized manufacturing plant that had
been operating for several years under a system of self-managing work teams

Results:
- Leader behavior variables:
 Encouraging self-management strategies:
 Self-reinforcement
 Self-observation/evaluation
 Self-expectation
 Rehearsal
 Self-criticism & self-goal setting do not add anything beyond other techniques
 Other:
 Communicates to & from management
 Facilitation of equipment/supplies & production flow, communication
between groups, encouraging within-group communication, group training,
group problem-solving, flexible task boundaries, etc. not relevant!
- Comparing Coordinators & Team Leaders: differ overall on any given leader-behavior
variable
 All self-management leader behaviors demonstrate significant differences (except
encourages rehearsal)  coordinators perceived sig. higher on encouraging self-
management than team leaders
 Team leader is an additional team member who facilitates the group's organization
 Coordinator has a fundamental responsibility to get the group to manage itself

Limitations:
- "Post-only" measurement, without control group



Cohen & Bailey, 1997

Supervisor behavior: e.g. behaviors that encouraged self-criticism & self-management
- Negative predictor of performance for self-directed work groups (opposing to Manz & Sims)
- Possible explanations:
 Supervisors may tend to exhibit encouraging behavior with poorly performing groups
 Supervisors may actually obstruct high performance by interfering
- Encouraging behaviors had no significant relationship to outcomes for traditionally managed
groups (they might be accustomed)
- Supervisor’s positive mood positively predicted prosocial behavior & negatively predicted
turnover




1

, 4.2 #4 LG1: What is a self-managing team? Creation?
What is the role of an “external” leader in leading the team effectively?
Druskat & Wheeler, 2003 – Effective Leadership of SMWT

Method:
- Critical
incident
interviews with
the external
leaders of
SMWT & their
team members
+ interviews &
surveys
provided by
managers

Results: leaders used their location to move back & forth between their teams & the organization
engaging in 4 categories of behavior:
1) Relating with team & organization members building political awareness & relationships to
create access to those who could provide information
 Organization-focused behavior: building social & political awareness
 helps developed access to people & places that allow to scout & obtain info
 Team-focused behavior:
 Building team trust: by showing fairness, reliability, & focus on teams' best
interest (without trust team felt vulnerable / subjected to leader)
 Caring for team members: care-giving actions that show respect & concern
for individual team members
2) Scouting information & staying abreast of activities inside & outside their teams
 Organization-focused behavior: seeking info from managers, peers & specialists
 Powerful tool for influencing actions & decisions of everyone
 Team-focused behavior: seeking info from inside their own team through:
 Diagnosing member behavior: to get info about team & member needs,
problems, strengths, & weaknesses
 Investigating problems systematically: collecting & analyzing data to trace
cause of a problem (e.g. member perspectives on it, its causes, & solution)
3) Persuading their teams to attend to organization needs/goals & persuading organization to
attend to team needs to empower own teams & generate resources for team success
 Organization-focused behavior: obtaining external support
 Allowed leader to empower team & increase its decision-making authority
 Team-focused behavior: influencing the team which sometimes involved
encouraging a team to make effective choices
 Helping team understand implications of their decisions & actions
 Use of data & info most powerful tool for encouraging or influencing teams
4) Empowering their teams involves delegating decision authority & supporting that delegation
 Team-focused behavior:
 Delegating authority: highly stressful for leader (as he keeps responsibility)
 Flexibility regarding team decisions
 Coaching: strengthening member contributions, team’s confidence, & its
ability to manage itself, giving feedback, & modeling behaviors

 all facilitate self-managing work team effectiveness

Limitations: Study was designed for theory building  results must be interpreted & generalized with
caution until replicated



2

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
havanna Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
29
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
25
Documenten
7
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

4,9

11 beoordelingen

5
10
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen