100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Research Summary week 1 t/m 8 information from book: Verhoeven

Beoordeling
3,0
(1)
Verkocht
7
Pagina's
22
Geüpload op
28-10-2019
Geschreven in
2018/2019

Research Theory Exam. Information from week 1 till week 8 all the information from the book: ''Doing Research, Verhoeven 4th Edition. Obtained grade: 7











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Onbekend
Geüpload op
28 oktober 2019
Aantal pagina's
22
Geschreven in
2018/2019
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Quantitative Research
Q3: Theory exam (individual)
Q4: Assignment exam (group)

Research week 1

Research helps to find decisions

The starting point of research is a situation in the industry, for example: a manager needs to
understand before he can change a situation. Organisations often wonder why something is
happening and they want to know why this is happening. Before we can understand we
need to know how big a problem or situation is.

4 research phases
1. Research objective and research questions
2. Planning of data collection and analysis
3. Execution of the research
4. Analysis and report

Types of research:

1) Descriptive research:
- What is the situation like?
- To what extend…? (focus on quantity) ( only one variable )
Reason to start a research is usually a situation in the industry. Organizations often
wonder why something is happening. Before we can explain why something is
happening, we need to know how big a problem or situation is. Once you know how
big a problem is, you can start looking at possible causes or consequesnces.
2) Exploratory research:
- We know the problem but we aren’t sure of the consequences
- Why does this hotel have few returning guests?
- Why? Which factors?
- Is about one organization
- You are exploring, you don’t know the cause yet
When they say that we are ‘exploring’ the possible causes or consequences of a
problem. We know the problem, but do not know the causes or consequences of the
problem. There is a black box in the problem. Often you will find more causes or
consequences. They always are applicable to more than one organisation.
3) Testing research:
- To what extent is X influencing Y?
- Is about a lot organizations
- You have an idea, but you have to test it
- Testing things that are already there
- Example: I am earning a salary but what does it influence how happy I am

, You know what is happening now. We will test whether the relations ship found in an
earlier study is also applicable to other organisation. We are testing to what extend
we will find the relationship in the currently researched.

The research objective always contains 2 things:

Objective within the research:
 The knowledge that the research should provide
The objective of the research:
 The relevance of the research, the why of the research and/or the motivation for the
research.


Formulation of a research objective
 The objective of this research is to gain insight to… in order to formulate
recommendations on….
 The objective of this research is to contribute to a solution for… by collecting knowledge
about…

In research, one wishes to say something about a group of people or about organisations.
Such a group of people is called the population.
The population is investigated for characteristics. These characteristics are called variables.


Requirements of a research question:
- Starts with a capital letter and ends with a question mark
- Formulated as neutral as possible / never an opinion in it
- Focused on information / not on a solution (no ‘how to’ questions)
- Formulated specifically (=with details, so more information)


Research week 2

Form central questions to sub-questions:
 Determine what the variables or core concepts in the central questions are
 Break down each variable/core concept into aspects
For example: this could be done on basis of literature, conversations with the client
or brainstorm sessions
 Together with the client, determine which of these aspects should be included in the
research
 Make sure each chosen aspect is part of the research question
 They have to be smaller than the central questions

EXAMPLE

Central research question:

, To what degree did the promotion campaign of tour operator Q prove to be a success?

AIDA Model


• Sub-question 1: What was the effect of the promotion
campaign on the attention of the target group for
products of tour operator Q?
• Sub-question 2: What was the effect of the promotion
campaign on the interest of the target group for
products of tour operator Q?
• Sub-question 3: What was the effect of the promotion
campaign on the desire of the target group for products of tour operator Q?
• Sub-question 4: What was the effect of the promotion campaign on the action of the
target group for products of tour operator Q?


Requirements sub-questions:

 Sub-questions must be relevant
 Sub-questions don’t overlap but complement each other
 Sub-questions are more specific than the concepts used from the problem description




Example descriptive question:
 To what extent are students satisfied with teaching styles of teachers at HM Saxion? (*
variable)
Example descriptive sub-question:
 To what extent are students satisfied with face to face teaching styles at HM Saxion?
 To what extent are students satisfied with digital teaching styles at HM Saxion?
Example testing question:
 To what extent does the religion of the student influence the satisfaction with the
teaching styles of teachers at HM Saxion? (* variable)
X is influencing Y.
Subquestion: To what extend does the religion of the students influence the satisfaction
with the teaching style of teachers at HM Saxion?
€3,49
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
kimschukkink
3,0
(1)

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
2 jaar geleden

3,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
kimschukkink Saxion Hogeschool
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
10
Lid sinds
10 jaar
Aantal volgers
9
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

3,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen